Core i7-11700K vs A10-7400P

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Aggregate performance score

A10-7400P
2014
4 cores / 4 threads, 35 Watt
1.34
Core i7-11700K
2021
8 cores / 16 threads, 125 Watt
15.92
+1088%

i7-11700K outperforms A10-7400P by a whopping 1088% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

Comparing A10-7400P and Core i7-11700K processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in performance ranking2157399
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluationno data58.00
Market segmentLaptopDesktop processor
SeriesAMD KaveriRocket Lake
Architecture codenameKaveri (2014−2015)Rocket Lake (2021)
Release date4 June 2014 (10 years ago)16 March 2021 (3 years ago)
Current price$45 $207

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance per price, higher is better.

no data

Detailed specifications

A10-7400P and Core i7-11700K basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores4 (Quad-Core)8 (Octa-Core)
Threads416
Base clock speed2.5 GHz3.6 GHz
Boost clock speed3.4 GHz5 GHz
L1 cacheno data64K (per core)
L2 cache4096 KB512K (per core)
L3 cacheno data16 MB (shared)
Chip lithography28 nm14 nm
Die size245 mm2no data
Maximum core temperature102 °C100 °C
Maximum case temperature (TCase)no data72 °C
Number of transistors2410 Millionno data
64 bit support++
Windows 11 compatibility-+
Unlocked multiplierNoYes

Compatibility

Information on A10-7400P and Core i7-11700K compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configurationno data1
SocketFP3FCLGA1200
Power consumption (TDP)35 Watt125 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by A10-7400P and Core i7-11700K. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

Instruction set extensions86x SSE (1, 2, 3, 3S, 4.1, 4.2, 4A),-64, AES, AVX, FMA, DDR3-1866 ControllerIntel® SSE4.1, Intel® SSE4.2, Intel® AVX2, Intel® AVX-512
AES-NI++
FMA++
AVX++
FRTC1no data
PowerTune-no data
TrueAudio+no data
PowerNow+no data
PowerGating+no data
Out-of-band client management+no data
VirusProtect+no data
RAID-no data
HSA1no data
vProno data+
Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST)no data+
Turbo Boost Technologyno data2.0
Hyper-Threading Technologyno data+
TSXno data+
Idle Statesno data+
Thermal Monitoringno data+
SIPPno data+
Turbo Boost Max 3.0no data+
Statusno dataDiscontinued

Security technologies

A10-7400P and Core i7-11700K technologies aimed at improving security, for example, by protecting against hacks.

TXTno data+
EDBno data+
Secure Keyno data+
Identity Protectionno data+
SGXno data-
OS Guardno data+

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by A10-7400P and Core i7-11700K are enumerated here.

AMD-V1no data
VT-dno data+
VT-xno data+
EPTno data+
IOMMU 2.0+no data

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by A10-7400P and Core i7-11700K. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesDDR3-1866DDR4
Maximum memory sizeno data128 GB
Max memory channels22
Maximum memory bandwidthno data50 GB/s
ECC memory supportno data-

Graphics specifications

General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.

Integrated graphics card
Compare
AMD Radeon R6 GraphicsIntel UHD Graphics 750
iGPU core count6no data
Number of pipelines384no data
Max video memoryno data64 GB
Quick Sync Videono data+
Clear Videono data+
Clear Video HDno data+
Enduro+no data
Switchable graphics1no data
UVD+no data
VCE+no data
Graphics max frequencyno data1.3 GHz
Execution Unitsno data32
InTru 3Dno data+

Graphics interfaces

Available interfaces and connections of A10-7400P and Core i7-11700K integrated GPUs.

Number of displays supportedno data3
DisplayPort+no data
HDMI+no data

Graphics image quality

Maximum display resolutions supported by A10-7400P and Core i7-11700K integrated GPUs, including resolutions over different interfaces.

4K resolution supportno data+
Max resolution over HDMI 1.4no data4096x2160@60Hz
Max resolution over eDPno data5120 x 3200 @60Hz
Max resolution over DisplayPortno data5120 x 3200 @60Hz

Graphics API support

APIs supported by A10-7400P and Core i7-11700K integrated GPUs, sometimes API versions are included.

DirectXDirectX® 1212.1
OpenGLno data4.5
Vulkan1no data

Peripherals

Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by A10-7400P and Core i7-11700K.

PCIe version3.04.0
PCI Express lanesno data20

Synthetic benchmark performance

Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark performance rating. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

A10-7400P 1.34
i7-11700K 15.92
+1088%

Core i7-11700K outperforms A10-7400P by 1088% based on our aggregate benchmark results.


Passmark

Passmark CPU Mark is a widespread benchmark, consisting of 8 different types of workload, including integer and floating point math, extended instructions, compression, encryption and physics calculation. There is also one separate single-threaded scenario measuring single-core performance.

Benchmark coverage: 68%

A10-7400P 2078
i7-11700K 24629
+1085%

Core i7-11700K outperforms A10-7400P by 1085% in Passmark.

GeekBench 5 Single-Core

GeekBench 5 Single-Core is a cross-platform application developed in the form of CPU tests that independently recreate certain real-world tasks with which to accurately measure performance. This version uses only a single CPU core.

Benchmark coverage: 42%

A10-7400P 320
i7-11700K 2225
+595%

Core i7-11700K outperforms A10-7400P by 595% in GeekBench 5 Single-Core.

GeekBench 5 Multi-Core

GeekBench 5 Multi-Core is a cross-platform application developed in the form of CPU tests that independently recreate certain real-world tasks with which to accurately measure performance. This version uses all available CPU cores.

Benchmark coverage: 42%

A10-7400P 696
i7-11700K 9807
+1309%

Core i7-11700K outperforms A10-7400P by 1309% in GeekBench 5 Multi-Core.

Gaming performance

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 1.34 15.92
Recency 4 June 2014 16 March 2021
Physical cores 4 8
Threads 4 16
Chip lithography 28 nm 14 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 35 Watt 125 Watt

The Core i7-11700K is our recommended choice as it beats the A10-7400P in performance tests.

Be aware that A10-7400P is a notebook processor while Core i7-11700K is a desktop one.


Should you still have questions on choice between A10-7400P and Core i7-11700K, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


AMD A10-7400P
A10-7400P
Intel Core i7-11700K
Core i7-11700K

Similar processor comparisons

We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


3.3 11 votes

Rate A10-7400P on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.6 1549 votes

Rate Core i7-11700K on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about A10-7400P or Core i7-11700K, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.