M-5Y51 vs A10-7400P

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Aggregate performance score

A10-7400P
2014
4 cores / 4 threads, 35 Watt
1.32
+4.8%
Core M-5Y51
2014
2 cores / 4 threads, 4 Watt
1.26

A10-7400P outperforms Core M-5Y51 by a small 5% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

Comparing A10-7400P and Core M-5Y51 processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in the ranking22492290
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Market segmentLaptopLaptop
SeriesAMD KaveriIntel Core M
Power efficiency3.5723.85
Architecture codenameKaveri (2014−2015)Broadwell-Y (2014)
Release date4 June 2014 (10 years ago)27 October 2014 (10 years ago)

Detailed specifications

A10-7400P and Core M-5Y51 basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores4 (Quad-Core)2 (Dual-core)
Threads44
Base clock speed2.5 GHz1.1 GHz
Boost clock speed3.4 GHz2.6 GHz
L1 cacheno data64K (per core)
L2 cache4096 KB256K (per core)
L3 cacheno data4 MB (shared)
Chip lithography28 nm14 nm
Die size245 mm250 mm2
Maximum core temperature102 °C95 °C
Number of transistors2410 Million1300 Million
64 bit support++
Windows 11 compatibility--

Compatibility

Information on A10-7400P and Core M-5Y51 compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configurationno data1
SocketFP3FCBGA1234
Power consumption (TDP)35 Watt4.5 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by A10-7400P and Core M-5Y51. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

Instruction set extensions86x SSE (1, 2, 3, 3S, 4.1, 4.2, 4A),-64, AES, AVX, FMAIntel® SSE4.1, Intel® SSE4.2, Intel® AVX2
AES-NI++
FMA+-
AVX++
FRTC+-
TrueAudio+-
PowerNow+-
PowerGating+-
Out-of-band client management+-
VirusProtect+-
HSA+-
Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST)no data+
Turbo Boost Technologyno data2.0
Hyper-Threading Technologyno data+
Idle Statesno data+
Thermal Monitoring-+
Flex Memory Accessno data+
Smart Responseno data+
FDIno data+
Fast Memory Accessno data+

Security technologies

A10-7400P and Core M-5Y51 technologies aimed at improving security, for example, by protecting against hacks.

TXTno data-
EDBno data+
Secure Keyno data+
Identity Protection-+
OS Guardno data+

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by A10-7400P and Core M-5Y51 are enumerated here.

AMD-V++
VT-dno data+
VT-xno data+
EPTno data+
IOMMU 2.0+-

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by A10-7400P and Core M-5Y51. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesDDR3-1866DDR3
Maximum memory sizeno data16 GB
Max memory channels22
Maximum memory bandwidthno data25.6 GB/s

Graphics specifications

General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.

Integrated graphics card
Compare
AMD Radeon R6 GraphicsIntel HD Graphics 5300
iGPU core count6no data
Number of pipelines384no data
Max video memoryno data16 GB
Quick Sync Video-+
Clear Video HDno data+
Enduro+-
Switchable graphics+-
UVD+-
VCE+-
Graphics max frequencyno data900 MHz
InTru 3Dno data+

Graphics interfaces

Available interfaces and connections of A10-7400P and Core M-5Y51 integrated GPUs.

Number of displays supportedno data3
eDPno data+
DisplayPort++
HDMI++

Graphics image quality

Maximum display resolutions supported by A10-7400P and Core M-5Y51 integrated GPUs, including resolutions over different interfaces.

Max resolution over HDMI 1.4no data2560x1600@60Hz
Max resolution over DisplayPortno data2560x1600@60Hz

Graphics API support

APIs supported by A10-7400P and Core M-5Y51 integrated GPUs, sometimes API versions are included.

DirectXDirectX® 1211.2/12
OpenGLno data4.3
Vulkan+-

Peripherals

Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by A10-7400P and Core M-5Y51.

PCIe version3.02.0
PCI Express lanesno data12

Synthetic benchmark performance

Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark performance rating. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

A10-7400P 1.32
+4.8%
M-5Y51 1.26

Passmark

Passmark CPU Mark is a widespread benchmark, consisting of 8 different types of workload, including integer and floating point math, extended instructions, compression, encryption and physics calculation. There is also one separate single-threaded scenario measuring single-core performance.

A10-7400P 2100
+4.9%
M-5Y51 2002

GeekBench 5 Single-Core

GeekBench 5 Single-Core is a cross-platform application developed in the form of CPU tests that independently recreate certain real-world tasks with which to accurately measure performance. This version uses only a single CPU core.

A10-7400P 320
M-5Y51 655
+105%

GeekBench 5 Multi-Core

GeekBench 5 Multi-Core is a cross-platform application developed in the form of CPU tests that independently recreate certain real-world tasks with which to accurately measure performance. This version uses all available CPU cores.

A10-7400P 696
M-5Y51 1122
+61.2%

Gaming performance

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 1.32 1.26
Recency 4 June 2014 27 October 2014
Physical cores 4 2
Chip lithography 28 nm 14 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 35 Watt 4 Watt

A10-7400P has a 4.8% higher aggregate performance score, and 100% more physical cores.

M-5Y51, on the other hand, has an age advantage of 4 months, a 100% more advanced lithography process, and 775% lower power consumption.

Given the minimal performance differences, no clear winner can be declared between A10-7400P and Core M-5Y51.


Should you still have questions on choice between A10-7400P and Core M-5Y51, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


AMD A10-7400P
A10-7400P
Intel Core M-5Y51
Core M-5Y51

Similar processor comparisons

We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


3.3 11 votes

Rate A10-7400P on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.6 7 votes

Rate Core M-5Y51 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about A10-7400P or Core M-5Y51, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.