EPYC 9755 vs A10-7300

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Primary details

Comparing A10-7300 and EPYC 9755 processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in the ranking2401not rated
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Market segmentLaptopServer
SeriesAMD Kaverino data
Power efficiency5.48no data
Architecture codenameKaveri (2014−2015)Turin (2024)
Release date4 June 2014 (10 years ago)10 October 2024 (less than a year ago)
Launch price (MSRP)no data$12,984

Detailed specifications

A10-7300 and EPYC 9755 basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores4 (Quad-Core)128
Threads4256
Base clock speed1.9 GHz2.7 GHz
Boost clock speed3.2 GHz4.1 GHz
L1 cacheno data80 KB (per core)
L2 cache4096 KB1 MB (per core)
L3 cacheno data512 MB (shared)
Chip lithography28 nm4 nm
Die size245 mm216x 70.6 mm2
Number of transistors2410 Million133,040 million
64 bit support++
Windows 11 compatibility-no data

Compatibility

Information on A10-7300 and EPYC 9755 compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configurationno data2
SocketFP3SP5
Power consumption (TDP)19 Watt500 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by A10-7300 and EPYC 9755. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

Instruction set extensions86x SSE (1, 2, 3, 3S, 4.1, 4.2, 4A),-64, AES, AVX, FMAno data
AES-NI++
FMA+-
AVX++
FRTC+-
TrueAudio+-
PowerNow+-
PowerGating+-
Out-of-band client management+-
VirusProtect+-
HSA+-
Precision Boost 2no data+

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by A10-7300 and EPYC 9755 are enumerated here.

AMD-V++
IOMMU 2.0+-

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by A10-7300 and EPYC 9755. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesDDR3DDR5
Max memory channels2no data

Graphics specifications

General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.

Integrated graphics cardAMD Radeon R6 GraphicsN/A
iGPU core count6no data
Enduro+-
Switchable graphics+-
UVD+-
VCE+-

Graphics interfaces

Available interfaces and connections of A10-7300 and EPYC 9755 integrated GPUs.

DisplayPort+-
HDMI+-

Graphics API support

APIs supported by A10-7300 and EPYC 9755 integrated GPUs, sometimes API versions are included.

DirectXDirectX® 12no data
Vulkan+-

Peripherals

Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by A10-7300 and EPYC 9755.

PCIe version3.05.0
PCI Express lanesno data128

Pros & cons summary


Recency 4 June 2014 10 October 2024
Physical cores 4 128
Threads 4 256
Chip lithography 28 nm 4 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 19 Watt 500 Watt

A10-7300 has 2531.6% lower power consumption.

EPYC 9755, on the other hand, has an age advantage of 10 years, 3100% more physical cores and 6300% more threads, and a 600% more advanced lithography process.

We couldn't decide between A10-7300 and EPYC 9755. We've got no test results to judge.

Be aware that A10-7300 is a notebook processor while EPYC 9755 is a server/workstation one.


Should you still have questions on choice between A10-7300 and EPYC 9755, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


AMD A10-7300
A10-7300
AMD EPYC 9755
EPYC 9755

Similar processor comparisons

We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


3.4 76 votes

Rate A10-7300 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
5 2 votes

Rate EPYC 9755 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about A10-7300 or EPYC 9755, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.