EPYC 7371 vs A10-7300

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Aggregate performance score

A10-7300
2014
4 cores / 4 threads, 19 Watt
1.10
EPYC 7371
2018
16 cores / 32 threads, 170 Watt
19.38
+1662%

EPYC 7371 outperforms A10-7300 by a whopping 1662% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

Comparing A10-7300 and EPYC 7371 processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in the ranking2414297
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluationno data5.59
Market segmentLaptopServer
SeriesAMD KaveriAMD EPYC
Power efficiency5.4810.78
Architecture codenameKaveri (2014−2015)Naples (2017−2018)
Release date4 June 2014 (10 years ago)16 November 2018 (6 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)no data$1,550

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance per price, higher is better.

no data

Detailed specifications

A10-7300 and EPYC 7371 basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores4 (Quad-Core)16 (Hexadeca-Core)
Threads432
Base clock speed1.9 GHz3.1 GHz
Boost clock speed3.2 GHz3.8 GHz
Multiplierno data31
L1 cacheno data96K (per core)
L2 cache4096 KB512K (per core)
L3 cacheno data64 MB (shared)
Chip lithography28 nm14 nm
Die size245 mm2192 mm2
Number of transistors2410 Million4,800 million
64 bit support++
Windows 11 compatibility--
Unlocked multiplier-+

Compatibility

Information on A10-7300 and EPYC 7371 compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configurationno data2 (Multiprocessor)
SocketFP3TR4
Power consumption (TDP)19 Watt170 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by A10-7300 and EPYC 7371. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

Instruction set extensions86x SSE (1, 2, 3, 3S, 4.1, 4.2, 4A),-64, AES, AVX, FMAno data
AES-NI++
FMA+-
AVX++
FRTC+-
TrueAudio+-
PowerNow+-
PowerGating+-
Out-of-band client management+-
VirusProtect+-
HSA+-

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by A10-7300 and EPYC 7371 are enumerated here.

AMD-V++
IOMMU 2.0+-

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by A10-7300 and EPYC 7371. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesDDR3DDR4 Eight-channel
Maximum memory sizeno data2 TiB
Max memory channels28
Maximum memory bandwidthno data170.671 GB/s
ECC memory support-+

Graphics specifications

General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.

Integrated graphics cardAMD Radeon R6 Graphicsno data
iGPU core count6no data
Enduro+-
Switchable graphics+-
UVD+-
VCE+-

Graphics interfaces

Available interfaces and connections of A10-7300 and EPYC 7371 integrated GPUs.

DisplayPort+-
HDMI+-

Graphics API support

APIs supported by A10-7300 and EPYC 7371 integrated GPUs, sometimes API versions are included.

DirectXDirectX® 12no data
Vulkan+-

Peripherals

Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by A10-7300 and EPYC 7371.

PCIe version3.03.0
PCI Express lanesno data128

Synthetic benchmark performance

Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark performance rating. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

A10-7300 1.10
EPYC 7371 19.38
+1662%

Passmark

Passmark CPU Mark is a widespread benchmark, consisting of 8 different types of workload, including integer and floating point math, extended instructions, compression, encryption and physics calculation. There is also one separate single-threaded scenario measuring single-core performance.

A10-7300 1742
EPYC 7371 30782
+1667%

Gaming performance

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 1.10 19.38
Recency 4 June 2014 16 November 2018
Physical cores 4 16
Threads 4 32
Chip lithography 28 nm 14 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 19 Watt 170 Watt

A10-7300 has 794.7% lower power consumption.

EPYC 7371, on the other hand, has a 1661.8% higher aggregate performance score, an age advantage of 4 years, 300% more physical cores and 700% more threads, and a 100% more advanced lithography process.

The EPYC 7371 is our recommended choice as it beats the A10-7300 in performance tests.

Be aware that A10-7300 is a notebook processor while EPYC 7371 is a server/workstation one.


Should you still have questions on choice between A10-7300 and EPYC 7371, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


AMD A10-7300
A10-7300
AMD EPYC 7371
EPYC 7371

Similar processor comparisons

We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


3.4 80 votes

Rate A10-7300 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
4 12 votes

Rate EPYC 7371 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about A10-7300 or EPYC 7371, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.