E1-2500 vs A10-7300

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Primary details

Comparing A10-7300 and E1-2500 processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in performance ranking2297not rated
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Market segmentLaptopLaptop
SeriesAMD KaveriAMD E-Series
Architecture codenameKaveri (2014−2015)Kabini (2013−2014)
Release date4 June 2014 (10 years ago)23 May 2013 (11 years ago)
Current price$453 $200

Detailed specifications

A10-7300 and E1-2500 basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores4 (Quad-Core)2 (Dual-core)
Threads42
Base clock speed1.9 GHzno data
Boost clock speed3.2 GHz1.4 GHz
L2 cache4096 KB1024 KB
L3 cacheno data0 KB
Chip lithography28 nm28 nm
Die size245 mm2246 mm2
Maximum case temperature (TCase)no data90 °C
Number of transistors2410 Million1,178 million
64 bit support++
Windows 11 compatibility--
Unlocked multiplierNoNo

Compatibility

Information on A10-7300 and E1-2500 compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configurationno data1
SocketFP3FT3
Power consumption (TDP)19 Watt15 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by A10-7300 and E1-2500. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

Instruction set extensions86x SSE (1, 2, 3, 3S, 4.1, 4.2, 4A),-64, AES, AVX, FMA, DDR3-1600 Controller86x SSE (1, 2, 3, 3S, 4.1, 4.2, 4A),-64, AES, AVX, DDR3L-1333
AES-NI++
FMA+FMA4
AVX++
FRTC1no data
PowerTune--
TrueAudio+-
PowerNow++
PowerGating++
Out-of-band client management+-
VirusProtect++
HSA1no data

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by A10-7300 and E1-2500 are enumerated here.

AMD-V1+
IOMMU 2.0++

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by A10-7300 and E1-2500. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesDDR3DDR3
Max memory channels21

Graphics specifications

General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.

Integrated graphics card
Compare
AMD Radeon R6 GraphicsAMD Radeon HD 8240
iGPU core count6no data
Enduro++
Switchable graphics11
UVD++
VCE++

Graphics interfaces

Available interfaces and connections of A10-7300 and E1-2500 integrated GPUs.

DisplayPort++
HDMI++

Graphics API support

APIs supported by A10-7300 and E1-2500 integrated GPUs, sometimes API versions are included.

DirectXDirectX® 12DirectX® 12
Vulkan11

Peripherals

Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by A10-7300 and E1-2500.

PCIe version3.02.0

Synthetic benchmark performance

Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.


Passmark

Passmark CPU Mark is a widespread benchmark, consisting of 8 different types of workload, including integer and floating point math, extended instructions, compression, encryption and physics calculation. There is also one separate single-threaded scenario measuring single-core performance.

Benchmark coverage: 68%

A10-7300 1739
+191%
E1-2500 598

A10-7300 outperforms E1-2500 by 191% in Passmark.

GeekBench 5 Single-Core

GeekBench 5 Single-Core is a cross-platform application developed in the form of CPU tests that independently recreate certain real-world tasks with which to accurately measure performance. This version uses only a single CPU core.

Benchmark coverage: 42%

A10-7300 276
+97.1%
E1-2500 140

A10-7300 outperforms E1-2500 by 97% in GeekBench 5 Single-Core.

GeekBench 5 Multi-Core

GeekBench 5 Multi-Core is a cross-platform application developed in the form of CPU tests that independently recreate certain real-world tasks with which to accurately measure performance. This version uses all available CPU cores.

Benchmark coverage: 42%

A10-7300 620
+161%
E1-2500 238

A10-7300 outperforms E1-2500 by 161% in GeekBench 5 Multi-Core.

Cinebench 10 32-bit single-core

Cinebench R10 is an ancient ray tracing benchmark for processors by Maxon, authors of Cinema 4D. Its single core version uses just one CPU thread to render a futuristic looking motorcycle.

Benchmark coverage: 20%

A10-7300 1992
+89.4%
E1-2500 1052

A10-7300 outperforms E1-2500 by 89% in Cinebench 10 32-bit single-core.

Cinebench 10 32-bit multi-core

Cinebench Release 10 Multi Core is a variant of Cinebench R10 using all the processor threads. Possible number of threads is limited by 16 in this version.

Benchmark coverage: 19%

A10-7300 5192
+158%
E1-2500 2016

A10-7300 outperforms E1-2500 by 158% in Cinebench 10 32-bit multi-core.

3DMark06 CPU

3DMark06 is a discontinued DirectX 9 benchmark suite from Futuremark. Its CPU part contains two scenarios, one dedicated to artificial intelligence pathfinding, another to game physics using PhysX package.

Benchmark coverage: 19%

A10-7300 2518
+147%
E1-2500 1021

A10-7300 outperforms E1-2500 by 147% in 3DMark06 CPU.

wPrime 32

wPrime 32M is a math multi-thread processor test, which calculates square roots of first 32 million integer numbers. Its result is measured in seconds, so that the less is benchmark result, the faster the processor.

Benchmark coverage: 18%

A10-7300 23.8
+234%
E1-2500 79.6

E1-2500 outperforms A10-7300 by 234% in wPrime 32.

Cinebench 11.5 64-bit multi-core

Cinebench Release 11.5 Multi Core is a variant of Cinebench R11.5 which uses all the processor threads. A maximum of 64 threads is supported in this version.

Benchmark coverage: 17%

A10-7300 2
+195%
E1-2500 1

A10-7300 outperforms E1-2500 by 195% in Cinebench 11.5 64-bit multi-core.

Cinebench 15 64-bit multi-core

Cinebench Release 15 Multi Core is a variant of Cinebench R15 which uses all the processor threads.

Benchmark coverage: 15%

A10-7300 158
+259%
E1-2500 44

A10-7300 outperforms E1-2500 by 259% in Cinebench 15 64-bit multi-core.

Cinebench 15 64-bit single-core

Cinebench R15 (standing for Release 15) is a benchmark made by Maxon, authors of Cinema 4D. It was superseded by later versions of Cinebench, which use more modern variants of Cinema 4D engine. The Single Core version (sometimes called Single-Thread) only uses a single processor thread to render a room full of reflective spheres and light sources.

Benchmark coverage: 15%

A10-7300 58
+115%
E1-2500 27

A10-7300 outperforms E1-2500 by 115% in Cinebench 15 64-bit single-core.

Cinebench 11.5 64-bit single-core

Cinebench R11.5 is an old benchmark by Maxon, authors of Cinema 4D. It was superseded by later versions of Cinebench, which use more modern variants of Cinema 4D engine. The Single Core version loads a single thread with ray tracing to render a glossy room full of crystal spheres and light sources.

Benchmark coverage: 14%

A10-7300 0.67
+97.1%
E1-2500 0.34

A10-7300 outperforms E1-2500 by 97% in Cinebench 11.5 64-bit single-core.

TrueCrypt AES

TrueCrypt is a discontinued piece of software that was widely used for on-the-fly-encryption of disk partitions, now superseded by VeraCrypt. It contains several embedded performance tests, one of them being TrueCrypt AES, which measures data encryption speed using AES algorithm. Result is encryption speed in gigabytes per second.

Benchmark coverage: 13%

A10-7300 1.2
+179%
E1-2500 0.4

A10-7300 outperforms E1-2500 by 179% in TrueCrypt AES.

WinRAR 4.0

WinRAR 4.0 is an outdated version of a popular file archiver. It contains an internal speed test, using 'Best' setting of RAR compression on large chunks of randomly generated data. Its results are measured in kilobytes per second.

Benchmark coverage: 13%

A10-7300 1510
+150%
E1-2500 604

A10-7300 outperforms E1-2500 by 150% in WinRAR 4.0.

x264 encoding pass 2

x264 Pass 2 is a slower variant of x264 video compression that produces a variable bit rate output file, which results in better quality since the higher bit rate is used when it is needed more. Benchmark result is still measured in frames per second.  

Benchmark coverage: 13%

A10-7300 12
+198%
E1-2500 4

A10-7300 outperforms E1-2500 by 198% in x264 encoding pass 2.

x264 encoding pass 1

x264 version 4.0 is a video encoding benchmark uses MPEG 4 x264 compression method to compress a sample HD (720p) video. Pass 1 is a faster variant that produces a constant bit rate output file. Its result is measured in frames per second, which means how many frames of the source video file were encoded per second.  

Benchmark coverage: 13%

A10-7300 62
+203%
E1-2500 20

A10-7300 outperforms E1-2500 by 203% in x264 encoding pass 1.

Geekbench 3 32-bit multi-core

Benchmark coverage: 5%

A10-7300 3758
+180%
E1-2500 1340

A10-7300 outperforms E1-2500 by 180% in Geekbench 3 32-bit multi-core.

Geekbench 3 32-bit single-core

Benchmark coverage: 5%

A10-7300 1565
+99.4%
E1-2500 785

A10-7300 outperforms E1-2500 by 99% in Geekbench 3 32-bit single-core.

Geekbench 2

Benchmark coverage: 5%

A10-7300 3865
+103%
E1-2500 1905

A10-7300 outperforms E1-2500 by 103% in Geekbench 2.

Pros & cons summary


Recency 4 June 2014 23 May 2013
Physical cores 4 2
Threads 4 2
Power consumption (TDP) 19 Watt 15 Watt

We couldn't decide between A10-7300 and E1-2500. We've got no test results to judge.


Should you still have questions on choice between A10-7300 and E1-2500, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


AMD A10-7300
A10-7300
AMD E1-2500
E1-2500

Similar processor comparisons

We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


3.4 74 votes

Rate A10-7300 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
2.4 104 votes

Rate E1-2500 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about A10-7300 or E1-2500, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.