Core 2 Duo T9500 vs A10-7300

Aggregate performance score

A10-7300
2014
4 cores / 4 threads, 19 Watt
1.10
Core 2 Duo T9500
2008
2 cores / 2 threads, 35 Watt
1.13
+2.7%

Core 2 Duo T9500 outperforms A10-7300 by a minimal 3% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

Comparing A10-7300 and Core 2 Duo T9500 processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in the ranking24142396
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Market segmentLaptopLaptop
SeriesAMD KaveriIntel Core 2 Duo
Power efficiency5.453.04
Architecture codenameKaveri (2014−2015)Penryn (2008−2011)
Release date4 June 2014 (10 years ago)10 January 2008 (16 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)no data$530

Detailed specifications

A10-7300 and Core 2 Duo T9500 basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores4 (Quad-Core)2 (Dual-core)
Threads42
Base clock speed1.9 GHz2.6 GHz
Boost clock speed3.2 GHz2.6 GHz
Bus rateno data800 MHz
L1 cacheno data128 KB
L2 cache4096 KB6 MB
L3 cacheno data6 MB L2 Cache
Chip lithography28 nm45 nm
Die size245 mm2107 mm2
Maximum core temperatureno data105 °C
Number of transistors2410 Million410 Million
64 bit support++
Windows 11 compatibility--
VID voltage rangeno data1V-1.25V

Compatibility

Information on A10-7300 and Core 2 Duo T9500 compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

SocketFP3BGA479,PBGA479,PGA478,PPGA478
Power consumption (TDP)19 Watt35 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by A10-7300 and Core 2 Duo T9500. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

Instruction set extensions86x SSE (1, 2, 3, 3S, 4.1, 4.2, 4A),-64, AES, AVX, FMAno data
AES-NI+-
FMA+-
AVX+-
FRTC+-
TrueAudio+-
PowerNow+-
PowerGating+-
Out-of-band client management+-
VirusProtect+-
HSA+-
Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST)no data+
Turbo Boost Technologyno data-
Hyper-Threading Technologyno data-
Idle Statesno data+
Demand Based Switchingno data-
FSB parityno data-

Security technologies

A10-7300 and Core 2 Duo T9500 technologies aimed at improving security, for example, by protecting against hacks.

TXTno data-
EDBno data+

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by A10-7300 and Core 2 Duo T9500 are enumerated here.

AMD-V+-
VT-xno data+
IOMMU 2.0+-

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by A10-7300 and Core 2 Duo T9500. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesDDR3no data
Max memory channels2no data

Graphics specifications

General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.

Integrated graphics cardAMD Radeon R6 Graphicsno data
iGPU core count6no data
Enduro+-
Switchable graphics+-
UVD+-
VCE+-

Graphics interfaces

Available interfaces and connections of A10-7300 and Core 2 Duo T9500 integrated GPUs.

DisplayPort+-
HDMI+-

Graphics API support

APIs supported by A10-7300 and Core 2 Duo T9500 integrated GPUs, sometimes API versions are included.

DirectXDirectX® 12no data
Vulkan+-

Peripherals

Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by A10-7300 and Core 2 Duo T9500.

PCIe version3.0no data

Synthetic benchmark performance

Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark performance rating. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

A10-7300 1.10
Core 2 Duo T9500 1.13
+2.7%

Passmark

Passmark CPU Mark is a widespread benchmark, consisting of 8 different types of workload, including integer and floating point math, extended instructions, compression, encryption and physics calculation. There is also one separate single-threaded scenario measuring single-core performance.

A10-7300 1742
Core 2 Duo T9500 1799
+3.3%

GeekBench 5 Single-Core

GeekBench 5 Single-Core is a cross-platform application developed in the form of CPU tests that independently recreate certain real-world tasks with which to accurately measure performance. This version uses only a single CPU core.

A10-7300 281
Core 2 Duo T9500 337
+19.9%

GeekBench 5 Multi-Core

GeekBench 5 Multi-Core is a cross-platform application developed in the form of CPU tests that independently recreate certain real-world tasks with which to accurately measure performance. This version uses all available CPU cores.

A10-7300 632
+15.1%
Core 2 Duo T9500 549

Cinebench 10 32-bit single-core

Cinebench R10 is an ancient ray tracing benchmark for processors by Maxon, authors of Cinema 4D. Its single core version uses just one CPU thread to render a futuristic looking motorcycle.

A10-7300 1992
Core 2 Duo T9500 2950
+48.1%

Cinebench 10 32-bit multi-core

Cinebench Release 10 Multi Core is a variant of Cinebench R10 using all the processor threads. Possible number of threads is limited by 16 in this version.

A10-7300 5192
Core 2 Duo T9500 5419
+4.4%

3DMark06 CPU

3DMark06 is a discontinued DirectX 9 benchmark suite from Futuremark. Its CPU part contains two scenarios, one dedicated to artificial intelligence pathfinding, another to game physics using PhysX package.

A10-7300 2518
+7.1%
Core 2 Duo T9500 2352

Gaming performance

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 1.10 1.13
Recency 4 June 2014 10 January 2008
Physical cores 4 2
Threads 4 2
Chip lithography 28 nm 45 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 19 Watt 35 Watt

A10-7300 has an age advantage of 6 years, 100% more physical cores and 100% more threads, a 60.7% more advanced lithography process, and 84.2% lower power consumption.

Core 2 Duo T9500, on the other hand, has a 2.7% higher aggregate performance score.

Given the minimal performance differences, no clear winner can be declared between A10-7300 and Core 2 Duo T9500.


Should you still have questions on choice between A10-7300 and Core 2 Duo T9500, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


AMD A10-7300
A10-7300
Intel Core 2 Duo T9500
Core 2 Duo T9500

Similar processor comparisons

We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


3.4 80 votes

Rate A10-7300 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
4.4 196 votes

Rate Core 2 Duo T9500 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about A10-7300 or Core 2 Duo T9500, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.