Xeon X3440 vs A10-6800K

#ad
Buy on Amazon
VS

Aggregated performance score

A10-6800K
2013
4 cores / 4 threads
2.06
+15.1%
Xeon X3440
2009
4 cores / 8 threads
1.79

A10-6800K outperforms Xeon X3440 by 15% based on our aggregated benchmark results.

Primary Details

Comparing A10-6800K and Xeon X3440 processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in performance ranking17891894
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Cost-Effectiveness Evaluation0.330.57
Market segmentDesktop processorServer
SeriesAMD A-Series (Desktop)no data
Architecture codenameRichland (2013−2014)no data
Release date1 June 2013 (10 years ago)1 July 2009 (14 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)$142no data
Current price$84 (0.6x MSRP)$52

Cost-Effectiveness Evaluation

Performance per price, higher is better.

Xeon X3440 has 73% better value for money than A10-6800K.

Detailed Specifications

A10-6800K and Xeon X3440 basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores4 (Quad-Core)4 (Quad-Core)
Threads48
Base clock speed4.1 GHz2.53 GHz
Boost clock speed4.4 GHz2.93 GHz
L1 cache192 KBno data
L2 cache4096 KBno data
L3 cache0 KB8 MB Intel® Smart Cache
Chip lithography32 nm45 nm
Die size246 mm2no data
Maximum core temperature74 °C73 °C
Maximum case temperature (TCase)74 °Cno data
Number of transistors1,303 millionno data
64 bit support++
Windows 11 compatibility--
Unlocked multiplierYesNo

Compatibility

Information on A10-6800K and Xeon X3440 compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configuration11
SocketFM2FCLGA1156,LGA1156
Power consumption (TDP)100 Watt95 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by A10-6800K and Xeon X3440. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

Instruction set extensionsno dataIntel® SSE4.2
AES-NI+-
FMA+no data
AVX+no data
PowerTune-no data
TrueAudio-no data
PowerNow+no data
PowerGating+no data
Out-of-band client management-no data
VirusProtect+no data
Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST)no data+
Turbo Boost Technologyno data1.0
Hyper-Threading Technologyno data+
Idle Statesno data+
Thermal Monitoringno data-
Demand Based Switchingno data+
PAEno data36 Bit
Statusno dataDiscontinued

Security technologies

A10-6800K and Xeon X3440 technologies aimed at improving security, for example, by protecting against hacks.

TXTno data+
EDBno data+

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by A10-6800K and Xeon X3440 are enumerated here.

AMD-V+no data
VT-dno data+
VT-xno data+
EPTno data+
IOMMU 2.0+no data

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by A10-6800K and Xeon X3440. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesDDR3-2133DDR3-800, DDR3-1066, DDR3-1333
Maximum memory sizeno data32 GB
Max memory channels22
Maximum memory bandwidthno data21 GB/s
ECC memory supportno data+

Graphics specifications

General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.

Integrated graphics cardAMD Radeon HD 8670Dno data
Number of pipelines384no data
Enduro+no data
Switchable graphics1no data
UVD+no data
VCE+no data

Graphics interfaces

Available interfaces and connections of A10-6800K and Xeon X3440 integrated GPUs.

DisplayPort+no data
HDMI+no data

Graphics API support

APIs supported by A10-6800K and Xeon X3440 integrated GPUs, sometimes API versions are included.

DirectXDirectX® 11no data

Peripherals

Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by A10-6800K and Xeon X3440.

PCIe version2.02.0
PCI Express lanesno data16

Synthetic benchmark performance

Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark performance rating. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

A10-6800K 2.06
+15.1%
Xeon X3440 1.79

A10-6800K outperforms Xeon X3440 by 15% based on our aggregated benchmark results.


Passmark

Passmark CPU Mark is a widespread benchmark, consisting of 8 different types of workload, including integer and floating point math, extended instructions, compression, encryption and physics calculation. There is also one separate single-threaded scenario measuring single-core performance.

Benchmark coverage: 68%

A10-6800K 3186
+15.1%
Xeon X3440 2767

A10-6800K outperforms Xeon X3440 by 15% in Passmark.

GeekBench 5 Single-Core

GeekBench 5 Single-Core is a cross-platform application developed in the form of CPU tests that independently recreate certain real-world tasks with which to accurately measure performance. This version uses only a single CPU core.

Benchmark coverage: 42%

A10-6800K 479
+25.7%
Xeon X3440 381

A10-6800K outperforms Xeon X3440 by 26% in GeekBench 5 Single-Core.

GeekBench 5 Multi-Core

GeekBench 5 Multi-Core is a cross-platform application developed in the form of CPU tests that independently recreate certain real-world tasks with which to accurately measure performance. This version uses all available CPU cores.

Benchmark coverage: 42%

A10-6800K 1140
Xeon X3440 1220
+7%

Xeon X3440 outperforms A10-6800K by 7% in GeekBench 5 Multi-Core.

Gaming performance

Pros & Cons Summary


Performance score 2.06 1.79
Recency 1 June 2013 1 July 2009
Threads 4 8
Chip lithography 32 nm 45 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 100 Watt 95 Watt

The A10-6800K is our recommended choice as it beats the Xeon X3440 in performance tests.

Be aware that A10-6800K is a desktop processor while Xeon X3440 is a server/workstation one.


Should you still have questions on choice between A10-6800K and Xeon X3440, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for Your Favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


AMD A10-6800K
A10-6800K
Intel Xeon X3440
Xeon X3440

Similar processor comparisons

We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.

Community Ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


4 398 votes

Rate A10-6800K on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.9 600 votes

Rate Xeon X3440 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & Сomments

Here you can ask a question about A10-6800K or Xeon X3440, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.