Xeon E3-1240 v5 vs A10-6800K

VS

Aggregate performance score

A10-6800K
2013
4 cores / 4 threads, 100 Watt
2.08
Xeon E3-1240 v5
2015
4 cores / 8 threads, 80 Watt
5.39
+159%

Xeon E3-1240 v5 outperforms A10-6800K by a whopping 159% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

Comparing A10-6800K and Xeon E3-1240 v5 processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in the ranking19141184
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluation0.273.83
Market segmentDesktop processorServer
SeriesAMD A-Series (Desktop)Intel Xeon E3
Power efficiency1.906.14
Architecture codenameRichland (2013−2014)Skylake-DT (2015)
Release date1 June 2013 (11 years ago)19 October 2015 (9 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)$142$282

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance per price, higher is better.

Xeon E3-1240 v5 has 1319% better value for money than A10-6800K.

Detailed specifications

A10-6800K and Xeon E3-1240 v5 basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores4 (Quad-Core)4 (Quad-Core)
Threads48
Base clock speed4.1 GHz3.5 GHz
Boost clock speed4.4 GHz3.9 GHz
Bus typeno dataDMI 3.0
Bus rateno data4 × 8 GT/s
Multiplierno data35
L1 cache192 KB256 KB
L2 cache4096 KB1 MB
L3 cache0 KB8 MB (shared)
Chip lithography32 nm14 nm
Die size246 mm2122 mm2
Maximum core temperature74 °Cno data
Maximum case temperature (TCase)74 °Cno data
Number of transistors1,303 million1,750 million
64 bit support++
Windows 11 compatibility--
Unlocked multiplier+-

Compatibility

Information on A10-6800K and Xeon E3-1240 v5 compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configuration11 (Uniprocessor)
SocketFM2FCLGA1151,FCLGA2011
Power consumption (TDP)100 Watt80 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by A10-6800K and Xeon E3-1240 v5. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

Instruction set extensionsno dataIntel® SSE4.1, Intel® SSE4.2, Intel® AVX2
AES-NI++
FMA+-
AVX++
PowerNow+-
PowerGating+-
VirusProtect+-
vProno data+
Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST)no data+
Turbo Boost Technologyno data2.0
Hyper-Threading Technologyno data+
TSX-+
Idle Statesno data+
Thermal Monitoring-+

Security technologies

A10-6800K and Xeon E3-1240 v5 technologies aimed at improving security, for example, by protecting against hacks.

TXTno data+
EDBno data+
Secure Keyno data+
MPX-+
SGXno dataYes with both Intel® SPS and Intel® ME
OS Guardno data+

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by A10-6800K and Xeon E3-1240 v5 are enumerated here.

AMD-V+-
VT-dno data+
VT-xno data+
EPTno data+
IOMMU 2.0+-

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by A10-6800K and Xeon E3-1240 v5. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesDDR3-2133DDR4-1866/2133, DDR3L-1333/1600
Maximum memory sizeno data64 GB
Max memory channels22
Maximum memory bandwidthno data34.134 GB/s
ECC memory support-+

Graphics specifications

General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.

Integrated graphics cardAMD Radeon HD 8670DN/A
Number of pipelines384no data
Enduro+-
Switchable graphics+-
UVD+-
VCE+-

Graphics interfaces

Available interfaces and connections of A10-6800K and Xeon E3-1240 v5 integrated GPUs.

DisplayPort+-
HDMI+-

Graphics image quality

Maximum display resolutions supported by A10-6800K and Xeon E3-1240 v5 integrated GPUs, including resolutions over different interfaces.

Max resolution over HDMI 1.4no dataN/A
Max resolution over eDPno dataN/A
Max resolution over DisplayPortno dataN/A
Max resolution over VGAno dataN/A

Graphics API support

APIs supported by A10-6800K and Xeon E3-1240 v5 integrated GPUs, sometimes API versions are included.

DirectXDirectX® 11N/A
OpenGLno dataN/A

Peripherals

Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by A10-6800K and Xeon E3-1240 v5.

PCIe version2.03.0
PCI Express lanesno data16

Synthetic benchmark performance

Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark performance rating. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

A10-6800K 2.08
Xeon E3-1240 v5 5.39
+159%

Passmark

Passmark CPU Mark is a widespread benchmark, consisting of 8 different types of workload, including integer and floating point math, extended instructions, compression, encryption and physics calculation. There is also one separate single-threaded scenario measuring single-core performance.

A10-6800K 3186
Xeon E3-1240 v5 8253
+159%

GeekBench 5 Single-Core

GeekBench 5 Single-Core is a cross-platform application developed in the form of CPU tests that independently recreate certain real-world tasks with which to accurately measure performance. This version uses only a single CPU core.

A10-6800K 483
Xeon E3-1240 v5 1318
+173%

GeekBench 5 Multi-Core

GeekBench 5 Multi-Core is a cross-platform application developed in the form of CPU tests that independently recreate certain real-world tasks with which to accurately measure performance. This version uses all available CPU cores.

A10-6800K 1146
Xeon E3-1240 v5 4329
+278%

Gaming performance

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 2.08 5.39
Recency 1 June 2013 19 October 2015
Threads 4 8
Chip lithography 32 nm 14 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 100 Watt 80 Watt

Xeon E3-1240 v5 has a 159.1% higher aggregate performance score, an age advantage of 2 years, 100% more threads, a 128.6% more advanced lithography process, and 25% lower power consumption.

The Xeon E3-1240 v5 is our recommended choice as it beats the A10-6800K in performance tests.

Note that A10-6800K is a desktop processor while Xeon E3-1240 v5 is a server/workstation one.


Should you still have questions on choice between A10-6800K and Xeon E3-1240 v5, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


AMD A10-6800K
A10-6800K
Intel Xeon E3-1240 v5
Xeon E3-1240 v5

Similar processor comparisons

We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


4 434 votes

Rate A10-6800K on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.9 160 votes

Rate Xeon E3-1240 v5 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about A10-6800K or Xeon E3-1240 v5, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.