Ryzen 3 2200GE vs A10-6800K

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Aggregate performance score

A10-6800K
2013
4 cores / 4 threads, 100 Watt
2.06
Ryzen 3 2200GE
2018
4 cores / 4 threads, 35 Watt
3.89
+88.8%

Ryzen 3 2200GE outperforms A10-6800K by an impressive 89% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

Comparing A10-6800K and Ryzen 3 2200GE processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in performance ranking18221383
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluation0.428.54
Market segmentDesktop processorDesktop processor
SeriesAMD A-Series (Desktop)AMD Ryzen 3
Architecture codenameRichland (2013−2014)Raven Ridge (2017−2018)
Release date1 June 2013 (11 years ago)19 April 2018 (6 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)$142no data
Current price$109 (0.8x MSRP)$115

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance per price, higher is better.

Ryzen 3 2200GE has 1933% better value for money than A10-6800K.

Detailed specifications

A10-6800K and Ryzen 3 2200GE basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores4 (Quad-Core)4 (Quad-Core)
Threads44
Base clock speed4.1 GHz3.2 GHz
Boost clock speed4.4 GHz3.6 GHz
L1 cache192 KB128K (per core)
L2 cache4096 KB512K (per core)
L3 cache0 KB4 MB (shared)
Chip lithography32 nm14 nm
Die size246 mm2210 mm2
Maximum core temperature74 °Cno data
Maximum case temperature (TCase)74 °Cno data
Number of transistors1,303 million4,950 million
64 bit support++
Windows 11 compatibility--
Unlocked multiplierYesYes

Compatibility

Information on A10-6800K and Ryzen 3 2200GE compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configuration11 (Uniprocessor)
SocketFM2AM4
Power consumption (TDP)100 Watt35 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by A10-6800K and Ryzen 3 2200GE. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

AES-NI++
FMA++
AVX++
PowerTune-no data
TrueAudio-no data
PowerNow+no data
PowerGating+no data
Out-of-band client management-no data
VirusProtect+no data

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by A10-6800K and Ryzen 3 2200GE are enumerated here.

AMD-V++
IOMMU 2.0+no data

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by A10-6800K and Ryzen 3 2200GE. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesDDR3-2133DDR4-2933
Maximum memory sizeno data64 GB
Max memory channels22
Maximum memory bandwidthno data46.933 GB/s
ECC memory supportno data+

Graphics specifications

General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.

Integrated graphics card
Compare
AMD Radeon HD 8670DAMD Radeon RX Vega 8 (Ryzen 2000/3000)
Number of pipelines384no data
Enduro+no data
Switchable graphics1no data
UVD+no data
VCE+no data

Graphics interfaces

Available interfaces and connections of A10-6800K and Ryzen 3 2200GE integrated GPUs.

DisplayPort+no data
HDMI+no data

Graphics API support

APIs supported by A10-6800K and Ryzen 3 2200GE integrated GPUs, sometimes API versions are included.

DirectXDirectX® 11no data

Peripherals

Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by A10-6800K and Ryzen 3 2200GE.

PCIe version2.03.0
PCI Express lanesno data12

Synthetic benchmark performance

Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark performance rating. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

A10-6800K 2.06
Ryzen 3 2200GE 3.89
+88.8%

Ryzen 3 2200GE outperforms A10-6800K by 89% based on our aggregate benchmark results.


Passmark

Passmark CPU Mark is a widespread benchmark, consisting of 8 different types of workload, including integer and floating point math, extended instructions, compression, encryption and physics calculation. There is also one separate single-threaded scenario measuring single-core performance.

Benchmark coverage: 68%

A10-6800K 3186
Ryzen 3 2200GE 6018
+88.9%

Ryzen 3 2200GE outperforms A10-6800K by 89% in Passmark.

Gaming performance

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 2.06 3.89
Integrated graphics card 1.37 4.50
Recency 1 June 2013 19 April 2018
Chip lithography 32 nm 14 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 100 Watt 35 Watt

The Ryzen 3 2200GE is our recommended choice as it beats the A10-6800K in performance tests.


Should you still have questions on choice between A10-6800K and Ryzen 3 2200GE, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


AMD A10-6800K
A10-6800K
AMD Ryzen 3 2200GE
Ryzen 3 2200GE

Similar processor comparisons

We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


4 409 votes

Rate A10-6800K on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
4 35 votes

Rate Ryzen 3 2200GE on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about A10-6800K or Ryzen 3 2200GE, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.