EPYC 9655P vs A10-6800K

VS

Aggregate performance score

A10-6800K
2013
4 cores / 4 threads, 100 Watt
2.01
EPYC 9655P
2024
96 cores / 192 threads, 400 Watt
100.00
+4875%

EPYC 9655P outperforms A10-6800K by a whopping 4875% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

Comparing A10-6800K and EPYC 9655P processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in the ranking19181
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluation0.272.48
Market segmentDesktop processorServer
SeriesAMD A-Series (Desktop)no data
Power efficiency1.9023.66
Architecture codenameRichland (2013−2014)Turin (2024)
Release date1 June 2013 (11 years ago)10 October 2024 (less than a year ago)
Launch price (MSRP)$142$10,811

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance per price, higher is better.

EPYC 9655P has 819% better value for money than A10-6800K.

Detailed specifications

A10-6800K and EPYC 9655P basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores4 (Quad-Core)96
Threads4192
Base clock speed4.1 GHz2.6 GHz
Boost clock speed4.4 GHz4.5 GHz
L1 cache192 KB80 KB (per core)
L2 cache4096 KB1 MB (per core)
L3 cache0 KB384 MB (shared)
Chip lithography32 nm4 nm
Die size246 mm212x 70.6 mm2
Maximum core temperature74 °Cno data
Maximum case temperature (TCase)74 °Cno data
Number of transistors1,303 million99,780 million
64 bit support++
Windows 11 compatibility-no data
Unlocked multiplier+-

Compatibility

Information on A10-6800K and EPYC 9655P compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configuration11
SocketFM2SP5
Power consumption (TDP)100 Watt400 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by A10-6800K and EPYC 9655P. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

AES-NI++
FMA+-
AVX++
PowerNow+-
PowerGating+-
VirusProtect+-
Precision Boost 2no data+

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by A10-6800K and EPYC 9655P are enumerated here.

AMD-V++
IOMMU 2.0+-

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by A10-6800K and EPYC 9655P. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesDDR3-2133DDR5
Max memory channels2no data

Graphics specifications

General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.

Integrated graphics cardAMD Radeon HD 8670DN/A
Number of pipelines384no data
Enduro+-
Switchable graphics+-
UVD+-
VCE+-

Graphics interfaces

Available interfaces and connections of A10-6800K and EPYC 9655P integrated GPUs.

DisplayPort+-
HDMI+-

Graphics API support

APIs supported by A10-6800K and EPYC 9655P integrated GPUs, sometimes API versions are included.

DirectXDirectX® 11no data

Peripherals

Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by A10-6800K and EPYC 9655P.

PCIe version2.05.0
PCI Express lanesno data128

Synthetic benchmark performance

Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark performance rating. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

A10-6800K 2.01
EPYC 9655P 100.00
+4875%

Passmark

Passmark CPU Mark is a widespread benchmark, consisting of 8 different types of workload, including integer and floating point math, extended instructions, compression, encryption and physics calculation. There is also one separate single-threaded scenario measuring single-core performance.

A10-6800K 3186
EPYC 9655P 158845
+4886%

Gaming performance

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 2.01 100.00
Recency 1 June 2013 10 October 2024
Physical cores 4 96
Threads 4 192
Chip lithography 32 nm 4 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 100 Watt 400 Watt

A10-6800K has 300% lower power consumption.

EPYC 9655P, on the other hand, has a 4875.1% higher aggregate performance score, an age advantage of 11 years, 2300% more physical cores and 4700% more threads, and a 700% more advanced lithography process.

The EPYC 9655P is our recommended choice as it beats the A10-6800K in performance tests.

Note that A10-6800K is a desktop processor while EPYC 9655P is a server/workstation one.


Should you still have questions on choice between A10-6800K and EPYC 9655P, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


AMD A10-6800K
A10-6800K
AMD EPYC 9655P
EPYC 9655P

Similar processor comparisons

We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


4 435 votes

Rate A10-6800K on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.2 54 votes

Rate EPYC 9655P on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about A10-6800K or EPYC 9655P, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.