i3-6100E vs A10-6800K

VS

Aggregate performance score

A10-6800K
2013
4 cores / 4 threads, 100 Watt
2.01
Core i3-6100E
2015
2 cores / 4 threads, 35 Watt
2.09
+4%

Core i3-6100E outperforms A10-6800K by a minimal 4% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

Comparing A10-6800K and Core i3-6100E processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in the ranking19331892
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluation0.350.24
Market segmentDesktop processorLaptop
SeriesAMD A-Series (Desktop)Intel Core i3
Power efficiency1.905.65
Architecture codenameRichland (2013−2014)Skylake (2015−2016)
Release date1 June 2013 (11 years ago)12 October 2015 (9 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)$142$225

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance per price, higher is better.

A10-6800K has 46% better value for money than i3-6100E.

Detailed specifications

A10-6800K and Core i3-6100E basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores4 (Quad-Core)2 (Dual-core)
Threads44
Base clock speed4.1 GHzno data
Boost clock speed4.4 GHz2.7 GHz
Bus typeno dataDMI 3.0
Bus rateno data4 × 8 GT/s
Multiplierno data27
L1 cache192 KB128 KB
L2 cache4096 KB512 KB
L3 cache0 KB3 MB
Chip lithography32 nm14 nm
Die size246 mm298.57 mm2
Maximum core temperature74 °Cno data
Maximum case temperature (TCase)74 °Cno data
Number of transistors1,303 million1750 Million
64 bit support++
Windows 11 compatibility--
Unlocked multiplier+-

Compatibility

Information on A10-6800K and Core i3-6100E compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configuration11 (Uniprocessor)
SocketFM2no data
Power consumption (TDP)100 Watt35 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by A10-6800K and Core i3-6100E. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

AES-NI++
FMA+-
AVX++
PowerNow+-
PowerGating+-
VirusProtect+-
Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST)no data+
TSX-+

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by A10-6800K and Core i3-6100E are enumerated here.

AMD-V+-
VT-dno data+
VT-xno data+
IOMMU 2.0+-

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by A10-6800K and Core i3-6100E. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesDDR3-2133LPDDR3-1866
Maximum memory sizeno data64 GB
Max memory channels22
Maximum memory bandwidthno data34.134 GB/s
ECC memory support-+

Graphics specifications

General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.

Integrated graphics card
Compare
AMD Radeon HD 8670DIntel HD Graphics 530
จำนวนพาธไลน์384no data
Enduro+-
Switchable graphics+-
UVD+-
VCE+-

Graphics interfaces

Available interfaces and connections of A10-6800K and Core i3-6100E integrated GPUs.

DisplayPort+-
HDMI+-

Graphics API support

APIs supported by A10-6800K and Core i3-6100E integrated GPUs, sometimes API versions are included.

DirectXDirectX® 11no data

Peripherals

Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by A10-6800K and Core i3-6100E.

PCIe version2.03.0
PCI Express lanesno data16

Synthetic benchmark performance

Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark performance rating. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

A10-6800K 2.01
i3-6100E 2.09
+4%

Passmark

Passmark CPU Mark is a widespread benchmark, consisting of 8 different types of workload, including integer and floating point math, extended instructions, compression, encryption and physics calculation. There is also one separate single-threaded scenario measuring single-core performance.

A10-6800K 3186
i3-6100E 3315
+4%

Gaming performance

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 2.01 2.09
Integrated graphics card 1.39 2.60
Recency 1 June 2013 12 October 2015
Physical cores 4 2
Chip lithography 32 nm 14 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 100 Watt 35 Watt

A10-6800K has 100% more physical cores.

i3-6100E, on the other hand, has a 4% higher aggregate performance score, 87.1% faster integrated GPU, an age advantage of 2 years, a 128.6% more advanced lithography process, and 185.7% lower power consumption.

Given the minimal performance differences, no clear winner can be declared between A10-6800K and Core i3-6100E.

Note that A10-6800K is a desktop processor while Core i3-6100E is a notebook one.


Should you still have questions on choice between A10-6800K and Core i3-6100E, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


AMD A10-6800K
A10-6800K
Intel Core i3-6100E
Core i3-6100E

Similar processor comparisons

We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


4 441 vote

Rate A10-6800K on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

No user ratings yet.

Rate Core i3-6100E on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about A10-6800K or Core i3-6100E, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.