i3-4102E vs A10-6800K

VS

Primary details

Comparing A10-6800K and Core i3-4102E processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in the ranking1933not rated
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluation0.35no data
Market segmentDesktop processorLaptop
SeriesAMD A-Series (Desktop)Intel Core i3
Power efficiency1.90no data
Architecture codenameRichland (2013−2014)Haswell (2013−2015)
Release date1 June 2013 (11 years ago)4 September 2013 (11 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)$142$225

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance per price, higher is better.

no data

Detailed specifications

A10-6800K and Core i3-4102E basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores4 (Quad-Core)2 (Dual-core)
Threads44
Base clock speed4.1 GHzno data
Boost clock speed4.4 GHz1.6 GHz
L1 cache192 KB64K (per core)
L2 cache4096 KB256K (per core)
L3 cache0 KB3 MB (shared)
Chip lithography32 nm22 nm
Die size246 mm2118 mm2
Maximum core temperature74 °C100 °C
Maximum case temperature (TCase)74 °Cno data
Number of transistors1,303 million1,400 million
64 bit support++
Windows 11 compatibility--
Unlocked multiplier+-

Compatibility

Information on A10-6800K and Core i3-4102E compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configuration11
SocketFM2Intel BGA1364
Power consumption (TDP)100 Watt25 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by A10-6800K and Core i3-4102E. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

AES-NI+-
FMA+-
AVX++
PowerNow+-
PowerGating+-
VirusProtect+-
Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST)no data+
Hyper-Threading Technologyno data+

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by A10-6800K and Core i3-4102E are enumerated here.

AMD-V++
VT-xno data+
IOMMU 2.0+-

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by A10-6800K and Core i3-4102E. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesDDR3-2133DDR3
Max memory channels2no data

Graphics specifications

General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.

Integrated graphics card
Compare
AMD Radeon HD 8670DIntel HD Graphics 4600 (400 - 900 MHz)
จำนวนพาธไลน์384no data
Enduro+-
Switchable graphics+-
UVD+-
VCE+-

Graphics interfaces

Available interfaces and connections of A10-6800K and Core i3-4102E integrated GPUs.

DisplayPort+-
HDMI+-

Graphics API support

APIs supported by A10-6800K and Core i3-4102E integrated GPUs, sometimes API versions are included.

DirectXDirectX® 11no data

Peripherals

Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by A10-6800K and Core i3-4102E.

PCIe version2.0no data

Pros & cons summary


Integrated graphics card 1.38 1.84
Recency 1 June 2013 4 September 2013
Physical cores 4 2
Chip lithography 32 nm 22 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 100 Watt 25 Watt

A10-6800K has 100% more physical cores.

i3-4102E, on the other hand, has 33.3% faster integrated GPU, an age advantage of 3 months, a 45.5% more advanced lithography process, and 300% lower power consumption.

We couldn't decide between A10-6800K and Core i3-4102E. We've got no test results to judge.

Note that A10-6800K is a desktop processor while Core i3-4102E is a notebook one.


Should you still have questions on choice between A10-6800K and Core i3-4102E, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


AMD A10-6800K
A10-6800K
Intel Core i3-4102E
Core i3-4102E

Similar processor comparisons

We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


4 440 votes

Rate A10-6800K on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3 2 votes

Rate Core i3-4102E on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about A10-6800K or Core i3-4102E, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.