Atom Z3770 vs A10-6800K

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Aggregate performance score

A10-6800K
2013
4 cores / 4 threads, 100 Watt
2.01
+337%
Atom Z3770
2013
4 cores / 4 threads, 8 Watt
0.46

A10-6800K outperforms Atom Z3770 by a whopping 337% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

Comparing A10-6800K and Atom Z3770 processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in the ranking19202919
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluation0.33no data
Market segmentDesktop processorLaptop
SeriesAMD A-Series (Desktop)no data
Power efficiency1.905.44
Architecture codenameRichland (2013−2014)Bay Trail-T (2013−2014)
Release date1 June 2013 (11 years ago)27 September 2013 (11 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)$142$37

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance per price, higher is better.

no data

Detailed specifications

A10-6800K and Atom Z3770 basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores4 (Quad-Core)4 (Quad-Core)
Threads44
Base clock speed4.1 GHz1.46 GHz
Boost clock speed4.4 GHz2.39 GHz
L1 cache192 KB64K (per core)
L2 cache4096 KB512K (per core)
L3 cache0 KB0 KB
Chip lithography32 nm22 nm
Die size246 mm2no data
Maximum core temperature74 °C90 °C
Maximum case temperature (TCase)74 °Cno data
Number of transistors1,303 millionno data
64 bit support++
Windows 11 compatibility--
Unlocked multiplier+-

Compatibility

Information on A10-6800K and Atom Z3770 compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configuration11
SocketFM2UTFCBGA1380
Power consumption (TDP)100 Watt8 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by A10-6800K and Atom Z3770. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

AES-NI++
FMA+-
AVX+-
PowerNow+-
PowerGating+-
VirusProtect+-
Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST)no data+

Security technologies

A10-6800K and Atom Z3770 technologies aimed at improving security, for example, by protecting against hacks.

Secure Keyno data+
Identity Protection-+
Anti-Theftno data+

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by A10-6800K and Atom Z3770 are enumerated here.

AMD-V+-
VT-xno data+
IOMMU 2.0+-

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by A10-6800K and Atom Z3770. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesDDR3-2133DDR3
Maximum memory sizeno data4 GB
Max memory channels22
Maximum memory bandwidthno data17.1 GB/s

Graphics specifications

General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.

Integrated graphics card
Compare
AMD Radeon HD 8670DIntel HD Graphics for Intel Atom Processor Z3700 Series
Number of pipelines384no data
Quick Sync Video-+
Clear Video HDno data+
Enduro+-
Switchable graphics+-
UVD+-
VCE+-
Graphics max frequencyno data667 MHz

Graphics interfaces

Available interfaces and connections of A10-6800K and Atom Z3770 integrated GPUs.

DisplayPort+-
HDMI+-

Graphics API support

APIs supported by A10-6800K and Atom Z3770 integrated GPUs, sometimes API versions are included.

DirectXDirectX® 11no data

Peripherals

Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by A10-6800K and Atom Z3770.

PCIe version2.0no data

Synthetic benchmark performance

Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark performance rating. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

A10-6800K 2.01
+337%
Atom Z3770 0.46

Passmark

Passmark CPU Mark is a widespread benchmark, consisting of 8 different types of workload, including integer and floating point math, extended instructions, compression, encryption and physics calculation. There is also one separate single-threaded scenario measuring single-core performance.

A10-6800K 3186
+333%
Atom Z3770 736

Cinebench 10 32-bit single-core

Cinebench R10 is an ancient ray tracing benchmark for processors by Maxon, authors of Cinema 4D. Its single core version uses just one CPU thread to render a futuristic looking motorcycle.

A10-6800K 3428
+188%
Atom Z3770 1189

Cinebench 10 32-bit multi-core

Cinebench Release 10 Multi Core is a variant of Cinebench R10 using all the processor threads. Possible number of threads is limited by 16 in this version.

A10-6800K 10077
+154%
Atom Z3770 3961

3DMark06 CPU

3DMark06 is a discontinued DirectX 9 benchmark suite from Futuremark. Its CPU part contains two scenarios, one dedicated to artificial intelligence pathfinding, another to game physics using PhysX package.

A10-6800K 4885
+121%
Atom Z3770 2212

wPrime 32

wPrime 32M is a math multi-thread processor test, which calculates square roots of first 32 million integer numbers. Its result is measured in seconds, so that the less is benchmark result, the faster the processor.

A10-6800K 16.1
+64.9%
Atom Z3770 26.55

x264 encoding pass 2

x264 Pass 2 is a slower variant of x264 video compression that produces a variable bit rate output file, which results in better quality since the higher bit rate is used when it is needed more. Benchmark result is still measured in frames per second.  

A10-6800K 23
+205%
Atom Z3770 8

x264 encoding pass 1

x264 version 4.0 is a video encoding benchmark uses MPEG 4 x264 compression method to compress a sample HD (720p) video. Pass 1 is a faster variant that produces a constant bit rate output file. Its result is measured in frames per second, which means how many frames of the source video file were encoded per second.  

A10-6800K 111
+174%
Atom Z3770 40

Geekbench 3 32-bit multi-core

A10-6800K 6774
+123%
Atom Z3770 3035

Geekbench 3 32-bit single-core

A10-6800K 2340
+139%
Atom Z3770 981

Gaming performance

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 2.01 0.46
Integrated graphics card 1.38 0.77
Recency 1 June 2013 27 September 2013
Chip lithography 32 nm 22 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 100 Watt 8 Watt

A10-6800K has a 337% higher aggregate performance score, and 79.2% faster integrated GPU.

Atom Z3770, on the other hand, has an age advantage of 3 months, a 45.5% more advanced lithography process, and 1150% lower power consumption.

The A10-6800K is our recommended choice as it beats the Atom Z3770 in performance tests.

Note that A10-6800K is a desktop processor while Atom Z3770 is a notebook one.


Should you still have questions on choice between A10-6800K and Atom Z3770, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


AMD A10-6800K
A10-6800K
Intel Atom Z3770
Atom Z3770

Similar processor comparisons

We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


4 437 votes

Rate A10-6800K on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
2.8 19 votes

Rate Atom Z3770 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about A10-6800K or Atom Z3770, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.