Xeon W-3375 vs A10-6790K

VS

Aggregate performance score

A10-6790K
2013
4 cores / 4 threads, 100 Watt
2.01
Xeon W-3375
2021
38 cores / 76 threads, 270 Watt
38.61
+1821%

Xeon W-3375 outperforms A10-6790K by a whopping 1821% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

Comparing A10-6790K and Xeon W-3375 processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in the ranking194286
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Market segmentDesktop processorServer
Power efficiency1.8313.04
Architecture codenameRichland (2013−2014)Ice Lake-W (2021)
Release date28 October 2013 (11 years ago)29 July 2021 (3 years ago)

Detailed specifications

A10-6790K and Xeon W-3375 basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores4 (Quad-Core)38
Threads476
Base clock speed4 GHz2.5 GHz
Boost clock speed4.3 GHz4 GHz
Bus rateno data8 GT/s
L1 cache192 KB64K (per core)
L2 cache4096 KB1 MB (per core)
L3 cache0 KB57 MB (shared)
Chip lithography32 nm10 nm
Die size246 mm2no data
Maximum core temperature74 °Cno data
Maximum case temperature (TCase)74 °C83 °C
Number of transistors1,178 millionno data
64 bit support++
Windows 11 compatibility-+
Unlocked multiplier+-

Compatibility

Information on A10-6790K and Xeon W-3375 compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configuration11
SocketFM2FCLGA4189
Power consumption (TDP)100 Watt270 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by A10-6790K and Xeon W-3375. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

Instruction set extensionsno dataIntel® AVX-512
AES-NI++
FMAFMA4-
AVXAVX+
PowerNow+-
PowerGating+-
VirusProtect+-
vProno data+
Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST)no data+
Speed Shiftno data+
Turbo Boost Technologyno data2.0
Hyper-Threading Technologyno data+
TSX-+
Turbo Boost Max 3.0no data-
Deep Learning Boost-+

Security technologies

A10-6790K and Xeon W-3375 technologies aimed at improving security, for example, by protecting against hacks.

TXTno data+
EDBno data+
SGXno data-

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by A10-6790K and Xeon W-3375 are enumerated here.

AMD-V+-
VT-dno data+
VT-xno data+
EPTno data+
IOMMU 2.0+-

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by A10-6790K and Xeon W-3375. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesDDR3-1866DDR4-3200
Maximum memory sizeno data4 TB
Max memory channels28
ECC memory support-+

Graphics specifications

General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.

Integrated graphics cardAMD Radeon HD 8670Dno data
Number of pipelines384no data
Enduro+-
Switchable graphics+-
UVD+-
VCE+-

Graphics interfaces

Available interfaces and connections of A10-6790K and Xeon W-3375 integrated GPUs.

DisplayPort+-
HDMI+-

Graphics API support

APIs supported by A10-6790K and Xeon W-3375 integrated GPUs, sometimes API versions are included.

DirectXDirectX® 11no data

Peripherals

Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by A10-6790K and Xeon W-3375.

PCIe version2.04
PCI Express lanesno data64

Synthetic benchmark performance

Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark performance rating. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

A10-6790K 2.01
Xeon W-3375 38.61
+1821%

Passmark

Passmark CPU Mark is a widespread benchmark, consisting of 8 different types of workload, including integer and floating point math, extended instructions, compression, encryption and physics calculation. There is also one separate single-threaded scenario measuring single-core performance.

A10-6790K 3081
Xeon W-3375 59091
+1818%

GeekBench 5 Single-Core

GeekBench 5 Single-Core is a cross-platform application developed in the form of CPU tests that independently recreate certain real-world tasks with which to accurately measure performance. This version uses only a single CPU core.

A10-6790K 357
Xeon W-3375 1818
+409%

GeekBench 5 Multi-Core

GeekBench 5 Multi-Core is a cross-platform application developed in the form of CPU tests that independently recreate certain real-world tasks with which to accurately measure performance. This version uses all available CPU cores.

A10-6790K 850
Xeon W-3375 17713
+1984%

Gaming performance

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 2.01 38.61
Recency 28 October 2013 29 July 2021
Physical cores 4 38
Threads 4 76
Chip lithography 32 nm 10 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 100 Watt 270 Watt

A10-6790K has 170% lower power consumption.

Xeon W-3375, on the other hand, has a 1820.9% higher aggregate performance score, an age advantage of 7 years, 850% more physical cores and 1800% more threads, and a 220% more advanced lithography process.

The Xeon W-3375 is our recommended choice as it beats the A10-6790K in performance tests.

Note that A10-6790K is a desktop processor while Xeon W-3375 is a server/workstation one.


Should you still have questions on choice between A10-6790K and Xeon W-3375, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


AMD A10-6790K
A10-6790K
Intel Xeon W-3375
Xeon W-3375

Similar processor comparisons

We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


4.2 49 votes

Rate A10-6790K on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.5 27 votes

Rate Xeon W-3375 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about A10-6790K or Xeon W-3375, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.