Core i9-12900F vs A10-6790K

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Aggregate performance score

A10-6790K
2013
4 cores / 4 threads, 100 Watt
1.99
Core i9-12900F
2022
16 cores / 24 threads, 65 Watt
23.81
+1096%

i9-12900F outperforms A10-6790K by a whopping 1096% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

Comparing A10-6790K and Core i9-12900F processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in performance ranking1850193
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluation0.4851.31
Market segmentDesktop processorDesktop processor
Architecture codenameRichland (2013−2014)Alder Lake-S (2022)
Release date28 October 2013 (10 years ago)4 January 2022 (2 years ago)
Current price$51 $424

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance per price, higher is better.

i9-12900F has 10590% better value for money than A10-6790K.

Detailed specifications

A10-6790K and Core i9-12900F basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores4 (Quad-Core)16 (Hexadeca-Core)
Threads424
Base clock speed4 GHz2.4 GHz
Boost clock speed4.3 GHz5.1 GHz
L1 cache192 KB80K (per core)
L2 cache4096 KB1.25 MB (per core)
L3 cache0 KB30 MB (shared)
Chip lithography32 nmIntel 7 nm
Die size246 mm2215 mm2
Maximum core temperature74 °C100 °C
Maximum case temperature (TCase)74 °C72 °C
Number of transistors1,178 millionno data
64 bit support++
Windows 11 compatibility-+
Unlocked multiplierYesYes

Compatibility

Information on A10-6790K and Core i9-12900F compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configuration11
SocketFM2FCLGA1700
Power consumption (TDP)100 Watt65 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by A10-6790K and Core i9-12900F. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

Instruction set extensionsno dataIntel® SSE4.1, Intel® SSE4.2, Intel® AVX2
AES-NI1+
FMAFMA4no data
AVXAVX+
PowerTune-no data
TrueAudio-no data
PowerNow+no data
PowerGating+no data
Out-of-band client management-no data
VirusProtect+no data
RAID-no data
Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST)no data+
Speed Shiftno data+
Turbo Boost Technologyno data2.0
Hyper-Threading Technologyno data+
TSXno data+
Idle Statesno data+
Thermal Monitoringno data+
Turbo Boost Max 3.0no data+
Statusno dataLaunched

Security technologies

A10-6790K and Core i9-12900F technologies aimed at improving security, for example, by protecting against hacks.

TXTno data+
EDBno data+
Secure Keyno data+
OS Guardno data+

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by A10-6790K and Core i9-12900F are enumerated here.

AMD-V+no data
VT-dno data+
VT-xno data+
EPTno data+
IOMMU 2.0+no data

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by A10-6790K and Core i9-12900F. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesDDR3-1866DDR5-4800, DDR4-3200
Maximum memory sizeno data128 GB
Max memory channels22
Maximum memory bandwidthno data76.8 GB/s

Graphics specifications

General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.

Integrated graphics cardAMD Radeon HD 8670Dno data
Number of pipelines384no data
Enduro+no data
Switchable graphics1no data
UVD+no data
VCE+no data

Graphics interfaces

Available interfaces and connections of A10-6790K and Core i9-12900F integrated GPUs.

DisplayPort+no data
HDMI+no data

Graphics API support

APIs supported by A10-6790K and Core i9-12900F integrated GPUs, sometimes API versions are included.

DirectXDirectX® 11no data

Peripherals

Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by A10-6790K and Core i9-12900F.

PCIe version2.05.0 and 4.0
PCI Express lanesno data20

Synthetic benchmark performance

Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark performance rating. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

A10-6790K 1.99
i9-12900F 23.81
+1096%

Core i9-12900F outperforms A10-6790K by 1096% based on our aggregate benchmark results.


Passmark

Passmark CPU Mark is a widespread benchmark, consisting of 8 different types of workload, including integer and floating point math, extended instructions, compression, encryption and physics calculation. There is also one separate single-threaded scenario measuring single-core performance.

Benchmark coverage: 68%

A10-6790K 3071
i9-12900F 36821
+1099%

Core i9-12900F outperforms A10-6790K by 1099% in Passmark.

GeekBench 5 Single-Core

GeekBench 5 Single-Core is a cross-platform application developed in the form of CPU tests that independently recreate certain real-world tasks with which to accurately measure performance. This version uses only a single CPU core.

Benchmark coverage: 42%

A10-6790K 357
i9-12900F 2523
+607%

Core i9-12900F outperforms A10-6790K by 607% in GeekBench 5 Single-Core.

GeekBench 5 Multi-Core

GeekBench 5 Multi-Core is a cross-platform application developed in the form of CPU tests that independently recreate certain real-world tasks with which to accurately measure performance. This version uses all available CPU cores.

Benchmark coverage: 42%

A10-6790K 850
i9-12900F 13712
+1513%

Core i9-12900F outperforms A10-6790K by 1513% in GeekBench 5 Multi-Core.

Gaming performance

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 1.99 23.81
Recency 28 October 2013 4 January 2022
Physical cores 4 16
Threads 4 24
Power consumption (TDP) 100 Watt 65 Watt

The Core i9-12900F is our recommended choice as it beats the A10-6790K in performance tests.


Should you still have questions on choice between A10-6790K and Core i9-12900F, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


AMD A10-6790K
A10-6790K
Intel Core i9-12900F
Core i9-12900F

Similar processor comparisons

We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


4.2 47 votes

Rate A10-6790K on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
4.3 131 vote

Rate Core i9-12900F on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about A10-6790K or Core i9-12900F, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.