Core i5-1035G1 vs A10-6790K
Aggregate performance score
i5-1035G1 outperforms A10-6790K by a whopping 140% based on our aggregate benchmark results.
Primary details
Comparing A10-6790K and Core i5-1035G1 processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.
| Place in performance ranking | 1896 | 1243 |
| Place by popularity | not in top-100 | 63 |
| Market segment | Desktop processor | Laptop |
| Series | no data | Intel Core i5 |
| Architecture codename | Richland (2013−2014) | Ice Lake (Client) (2019) |
| Release date | 28 October 2013 (10 years ago) | 1 August 2019 (5 years ago) |
| Launch price (MSRP) | no data | $297 |
Detailed specifications
A10-6790K and Core i5-1035G1 basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.
| Physical cores | 4 (Quad-Core) | 4 (Quad-Core) |
| Threads | 4 | 8 |
| Base clock speed | 4 GHz | 1 GHz |
| Boost clock speed | 4.3 GHz | 1000 MHz - 3600 MHz (1 core) 3300 MHz (4) |
| Bus type | no data | OPI |
| Bus rate | no data | 4 × 4 GT/s |
| Multiplier | no data | 10 |
| L1 cache | 128 KB (per core) | 320 KB |
| L2 cache | 1 MB (per core) | 2 MB |
| L3 cache | 0 KB | 6 MB |
| Chip lithography | 32 nm | 10 nm |
| Die size | 246 mm2 | no data |
| Maximum core temperature | no data | 100 °C |
| Maximum case temperature (TCase) | 74 °C | 72 °C |
| Number of transistors | 1,178 million | no data |
| 64 bit support | + | + |
| Windows 11 compatibility | - | + |
| Unlocked multiplier | Yes | No |
Compatibility
Information on A10-6790K and Core i5-1035G1 compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.
| Number of CPUs in a configuration | 1 | 1 (Uniprocessor) |
| Socket | FM2 | BGA1526 |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 100 Watt | 15 Watt |
Technologies and extensions
Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by A10-6790K and Core i5-1035G1. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.
| AES-NI | no data | + |
| FMA | no data | + |
| AVX | no data | + |
| Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST) | no data | + |
| Hyper-Threading Technology | no data | + |
Virtualization technologies
Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by A10-6790K and Core i5-1035G1 are enumerated here.
| AMD-V | + | no data |
| VT-d | no data | + |
| VT-x | no data | + |
Memory specs
Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by A10-6790K and Core i5-1035G1. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.
| Supported memory types | DDR3 | DDR4 |
| Maximum memory size | no data | 64 GB |
| Max memory channels | no data | 4 |
| Maximum memory bandwidth | no data | 59.732 GB/s |
| ECC memory support | no data | - |
Graphics specifications
General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.
| Integrated graphics card Compare | AMD Radeon HD 8670D | Intel UHD Graphics G1 (Ice Lake 32 EU) |
Synthetic benchmark performance
Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.
Combined synthetic benchmark score
This is our combined benchmark performance rating. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.
Passmark
Passmark CPU Mark is a widespread benchmark, consisting of 8 different types of workload, including integer and floating point math, extended instructions, compression, encryption and physics calculation. There is also one separate single-threaded scenario measuring single-core performance.
Pros & cons summary
| Performance score | 1.99 | 4.77 |
| Integrated graphics card | 1.37 | 3.06 |
| Recency | 28 October 2013 | 1 August 2019 |
| Threads | 4 | 8 |
| Chip lithography | 32 nm | 10 nm |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 100 Watt | 15 Watt |
i5-1035G1 has a 139.7% higher aggregate performance score, 123.4% faster integrated GPU, an age advantage of 5 years, 100% more threads, a 220% more advanced lithography process, and 566.7% lower power consumption.
The Core i5-1035G1 is our recommended choice as it beats the A10-6790K in performance tests.
Note that A10-6790K is a desktop processor while Core i5-1035G1 is a notebook one.
Should you still have questions on choice between A10-6790K and Core i5-1035G1, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.
Similar processor comparisons
We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.
