Ultra 7 256V vs A10-6700T

Aggregate performance score

A10-6700T
2013
4 cores / 4 threads, 45 Watt
1.45
Core Ultra 7 256V
2024
8 cores / 8 threads, 17 Watt
12.16
+739%

Core Ultra 7 256V outperforms A10-6700T by a whopping 739% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

Comparing A10-6700T and Core Ultra 7 256V processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in the ranking2173632
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Market segmentDesktop processorLaptop
Power efficiency3.0567.69
Architecture codenameRichland (2013−2014)Lunar Lake (2024)
Release date16 September 2013 (11 years ago)24 September 2024 (less than a year ago)

Detailed specifications

A10-6700T and Core Ultra 7 256V basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores4 (Quad-Core)8 (Octa-Core)
Threads48
Base clock speed2.5 GHz2.2 GHz
Boost clock speed3.5 GHz4.8 GHz
Bus rateno data37 MHz
L1 cache192 KB192 KB (per core)
L2 cache4096 KB2.5 MB (per core)
L3 cache0 KB12 MB (shared)
Chip lithography32 nm3 nm
Die size246 mm2no data
Maximum core temperature71 °C100 °C
Maximum case temperature (TCase)71 °Cno data
Number of transistors1,178 millionno data
64 bit support++
Windows 11 compatibility-no data

Compatibility

Information on A10-6700T and Core Ultra 7 256V compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configuration11
SocketFM2Intel BGA 2833
Power consumption (TDP)45 Watt17 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by A10-6700T and Core Ultra 7 256V. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

AES-NI++
FMAFMA4-
AVXAVX+
PowerNow+-
PowerGating+-
VirusProtect+-
Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST)no data+
TSX-+

Security technologies

A10-6700T and Core Ultra 7 256V technologies aimed at improving security, for example, by protecting against hacks.

TXTno data+

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by A10-6700T and Core Ultra 7 256V are enumerated here.

AMD-V+-
VT-dno data+
VT-xno data+
IOMMU 2.0+-

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by A10-6700T and Core Ultra 7 256V. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesDDR3-1866DDR5
Max memory channels2no data

Graphics specifications

General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.

Integrated graphics cardAMD Radeon™ HD 8650DArc 140V
Number of pipelines384no data
Enduro+-
Switchable graphics+-
UVD+-
VCE+-

Graphics interfaces

Available interfaces and connections of A10-6700T and Core Ultra 7 256V integrated GPUs.

DisplayPort+-
HDMI+-

Graphics API support

APIs supported by A10-6700T and Core Ultra 7 256V integrated GPUs, sometimes API versions are included.

DirectXDirectX® 11no data

Peripherals

Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by A10-6700T and Core Ultra 7 256V.

PCIe version2.05.0
PCI Express lanesno data4

Synthetic benchmark performance

Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark performance rating. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

A10-6700T 1.45
Ultra 7 256V 12.16
+739%

Passmark

Passmark CPU Mark is a widespread benchmark, consisting of 8 different types of workload, including integer and floating point math, extended instructions, compression, encryption and physics calculation. There is also one separate single-threaded scenario measuring single-core performance.

A10-6700T 2299
Ultra 7 256V 19320
+740%

Gaming performance

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 1.45 12.16
Recency 16 September 2013 24 September 2024
Physical cores 4 8
Threads 4 8
Chip lithography 32 nm 3 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 45 Watt 17 Watt

Ultra 7 256V has a 738.6% higher aggregate performance score, an age advantage of 11 years, 100% more physical cores and 100% more threads, a 966.7% more advanced lithography process, and 164.7% lower power consumption.

The Core Ultra 7 256V is our recommended choice as it beats the A10-6700T in performance tests.

Note that A10-6700T is a desktop processor while Core Ultra 7 256V is a notebook one.


Should you still have questions on choice between A10-6700T and Core Ultra 7 256V, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


AMD A10-6700T
A10-6700T
Intel Core Ultra 7 256V
Core Ultra 7 256V

Similar processor comparisons

We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


4.4 13 votes

Rate A10-6700T on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
5 2 votes

Rate Core Ultra 7 256V on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about A10-6700T or Core Ultra 7 256V, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.