EPYC 7451 vs A10-6700

Primary details

Comparing A10-6700 and EPYC 7451 processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in performance ranking	1835	358
Place by popularity	not in top-100	not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluation	0.42	2.09
Market segment	Desktop processor	Server
Series	no data	AMD EPYC
Architecture codename	Richland (2013−2014)	Naples (2017−2018)
Release date	1 June 2013 (11 years ago)	29 June 2017 (7 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)	no data	$2,400
Current price	$103	$2768 (1.2x MSRP)

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance per price, higher is better.

EPYC 7451 has 398% better value for money than A10-6700.

Detailed specifications

A10-6700 and EPYC 7451 basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores	4 (Quad-Core)	24 (Tetracosa-Core)
Threads	4	48
Base clock speed	3.7 GHz	2.3 GHz
Boost clock speed	4.3 GHz	3.2 GHz
L1 cache	192 KB	96K (per core)
L2 cache	4096 KB	512K (per core)
L3 cache	0 KB	64 MB (shared)
Chip lithography	32 nm	14 nm
Die size	246 mm2	192 mm2
Maximum core temperature	71 °C	no data
Maximum case temperature (TCase)	71 °C	no data
Number of transistors	1,178 million	4,800 million
64 bit support	+	+
Windows 11 compatibility	-	-
Unlocked multiplier	No	Yes

Compatibility

Information on A10-6700 and EPYC 7451 compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configuration	1	2 (Multiprocessor)
Socket	FM2	TR4
Power consumption (TDP)	65 Watt	180 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by A10-6700 and EPYC 7451. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

AES-NI	1	+
FMA	FMA4	no data
AVX	AVX	+
PowerTune	-	no data
TrueAudio	-	no data
PowerNow	+	no data
PowerGating	+	no data
Out-of-band client management	-	no data
VirusProtect	+	no data
RAID	-	no data

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by A10-6700 and EPYC 7451 are enumerated here.

AMD-V	+	+
IOMMU 2.0	+	no data

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by A10-6700 and EPYC 7451. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory types	DDR3-1866	DDR4 Eight-channel
Maximum memory size	no data	2 TiB
Max memory channels	2	8
Maximum memory bandwidth	no data	170.671 GB/s
ECC memory support	no data	+

Graphics specifications

General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.

Integrated graphics card	AMD Radeon HD 8670D	no data
Number of pipelines	384	no data
Enduro	+	no data
Switchable graphics	1	no data
UVD	+	no data
VCE	+	no data

Graphics interfaces

Available interfaces and connections of A10-6700 and EPYC 7451 integrated GPUs.

DisplayPort	+	no data
HDMI	+	no data

Graphics API support

APIs supported by A10-6700 and EPYC 7451 integrated GPUs, sometimes API versions are included.

DirectX

DirectX® 11

no data

Peripherals

Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by A10-6700 and EPYC 7451.

PCIe version	2.0	3.0
PCI Express lanes	no data	128

Synthetic benchmark performance

Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.

---

Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark performance rating. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

EPYC 7451 outperforms A10-6700 by 728% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

---

Pros & cons summary

---

Performance score	2.02	16.72
Recency	1 June 2013	29 June 2017
Physical cores	4	24
Threads	4	48
Chip lithography	32 nm	14 nm
Power consumption (TDP)	65 Watt	180 Watt

---

Should you still have questions on choice between A10-6700 and EPYC 7451, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.

---