A8-4557M vs A10-6700
Primary details
Comparing A10-6700 and A8-4557M processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.
Place in the ranking | 1953 | not rated |
Place by popularity | not in top-100 | not in top-100 |
Market segment | Desktop processor | Laptop |
Series | no data | AMD A-Series |
Power efficiency | 2.84 | no data |
Architecture codename | Richland (2013−2014) | Trinity (2012−2013) |
Release date | 1 June 2013 (11 years ago) | 15 May 2012 (12 years ago) |
Detailed specifications
A10-6700 and A8-4557M basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.
Physical cores | 4 (Quad-Core) | 4 (Quad-Core) |
Threads | 4 | 4 |
Base clock speed | 3.7 GHz | 1.9 GHz |
Boost clock speed | 4.3 GHz | 2.8 GHz |
L1 cache | 192 KB | no data |
L2 cache | 4096 KB | 4 MB |
L3 cache | 0 KB | no data |
Chip lithography | 32 nm | 32 nm |
Die size | 246 mm2 | 246 mm2 |
Maximum core temperature | 71 °C | no data |
Maximum case temperature (TCase) | 71 °C | no data |
Number of transistors | 1,178 million | 1303 Million |
64 bit support | + | + |
Windows 11 compatibility | - | - |
Compatibility
Information on A10-6700 and A8-4557M compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.
Number of CPUs in a configuration | 1 | no data |
Socket | FM2 | BGA |
Power consumption (TDP) | 65 Watt | 35 Watt |
Technologies and extensions
Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by A10-6700 and A8-4557M. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.
Instruction set extensions | no data | 86x SSE (1, 2, 3, 3S, 4.1, 4.2, 4A),-64, AES, AVX, FMA |
AES-NI | + | + |
FMA | FMA4 | + |
AVX | AVX | + |
PowerNow | + | - |
PowerGating | + | - |
VirusProtect | + | - |
Virtualization technologies
Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by A10-6700 and A8-4557M are enumerated here.
AMD-V | + | - |
IOMMU 2.0 | + | - |
Memory specs
Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by A10-6700 and A8-4557M. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.
Supported memory types | DDR3-1866 | no data |
Max memory channels | 2 | no data |
Graphics specifications
General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.
Integrated graphics card Compare | AMD Radeon HD 8670D | AMD Radeon HD 7640G (497 - 655 MHz) |
จำนวนพาธไลน์ | 384 | no data |
Enduro | + | - |
Switchable graphics | + | - |
UVD | + | - |
VCE | + | - |
Graphics interfaces
Available interfaces and connections of A10-6700 and A8-4557M integrated GPUs.
DisplayPort | + | - |
HDMI | + | - |
Graphics API support
APIs supported by A10-6700 and A8-4557M integrated GPUs, sometimes API versions are included.
DirectX | DirectX® 11 | no data |
Peripherals
Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by A10-6700 and A8-4557M.
PCIe version | 2.0 | no data |
Pros & cons summary
Integrated graphics card | 1.38 | 1.19 |
Recency | 1 June 2013 | 15 May 2012 |
Power consumption (TDP) | 65 Watt | 35 Watt |
A10-6700 has 16% faster integrated GPU, and an age advantage of 1 year.
A8-4557M, on the other hand, has 85.7% lower power consumption.
We couldn't decide between A10-6700 and A8-4557M. We've got no test results to judge.
Note that A10-6700 is a desktop processor while A8-4557M is a notebook one.
Should you still have questions on choice between A10-6700 and A8-4557M, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.
Similar processor comparisons
We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.