i7-940XM Extreme Edition vs A10-5800K
Contents
Primary details
Comparing processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.
| Place in the ranking | 2267 | not rated |
| Place by popularity | not in top-100 | not in top-100 |
| Cost-effectiveness evaluation | 0.35 | no data |
| Market segment | Desktop processor | Laptop |
| Series | AMD A-Series (Desktop) | Intel Core i7EE |
| Power efficiency | 1.80 | no data |
| Designer | AMD | Intel |
| Architecture codename | Trinity (2012−2013) | Nehalem (2008−2010) |
| Release date | 2 October 2012 (13 years ago) | 5 February 2010 (15 years ago) |
| Launch price (MSRP) | $122 | $1,096 |
Cost-effectiveness evaluation
Performance per price, higher is better.
Performance to price scatter graph
Detailed specifications
A10-5800K and Core i7-940XM Extreme Edition basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.
| Physical cores | 4 (Quad-Core) | 4 (Quad-Core) |
| Threads | 4 | 8 |
| Base clock speed | 3.8 GHz | no data |
| Boost clock speed | 4.2 GHz | 2.13 GHz |
| Bus type | no data | DMI |
| Bus rate | no data | 2.5 GT/s |
| Multiplier | no data | 16 |
| L1 cache | 128 KB (per core) | 256 KB |
| L2 cache | 1 MB (per core) | 1 MB |
| L3 cache | 0 KB | 8 MB |
| Chip lithography | 32 nm | 45 nm |
| Die size | 246 mm2 | 296 mm2 |
| Maximum case temperature (TCase) | 74 °C | no data |
| Number of transistors | 1,178 million | 774 Million |
| 64 bit support | + | + |
| Windows 11 compatibility | - | - |
| Unlocked multiplier | + | - |
Compatibility
Information on A10-5800K and Core i7-940XM Extreme Edition compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.
| Number of CPUs in a configuration | 1 | 1 (Uniprocessor) |
| Socket | FM2 | no data |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 100 Watt | 55 Watt |
Technologies and extensions
Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by A10-5800K and Core i7-940XM Extreme Edition. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.
| Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST) | no data | + |
Security technologies
A10-5800K and Core i7-940XM Extreme Edition technologies aimed at improving security, for example, by protecting against hacks.
| TXT | no data | + |
Virtualization technologies
Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by A10-5800K and Core i7-940XM Extreme Edition are enumerated here.
| AMD-V | + | - |
| VT-d | no data | + |
| VT-x | no data | + |
Memory specs
Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by A10-5800K and Core i7-940XM Extreme Edition. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.
| Supported memory types | DDR3 | DDR3-1333 |
| Maximum memory size | no data | 8 GB |
| Max memory channels | no data | 2 |
| Maximum memory bandwidth | no data | 21.335 GB/s |
Graphics specifications
General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.
| Integrated graphics card | AMD Radeon HD 7660D (800 MHz) | no data |
Peripherals
Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by A10-5800K and Core i7-940XM Extreme Edition.
| PCIe version | no data | 2.0 |
| PCI Express lanes | no data | 16 |
Pros & cons summary
| Recency | 2 October 2012 | 5 February 2010 |
| Threads | 4 | 8 |
| Chip lithography | 32 nm | 45 nm |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 100 Watt | 55 Watt |
A10-5800K has an age advantage of 2 years, and a 40.6% more advanced lithography process.
i7-940XM Extreme Edition, on the other hand, has 100% more threads, and 81.8% lower power consumption.
We couldn't decide between AMD A10-5800K and Intel Core i7-940XM Extreme Edition. We've got no test results to judge.
Note that A10-5800K is a desktop processor while Core i7-940XM Extreme Edition is a notebook one.
Other comparisons
We've compiled a selection of CPU comparisons, ranging from closely matched processors to other comparisons that may be of interest.
