Ryzen 9 7945HX vs A10-5800B

VS

Aggregate performance score

A10-5800B
2012
4 cores / 4 threads, 100 Watt
1.91
Ryzen 9 7945HX
2023
16 cores / 32 threads, 55 Watt
34.41
+1702%

Ryzen 9 7945HX outperforms A10-5800B by a whopping 1702% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

Comparing A10-5800B and Ryzen 9 7945HX processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in the ranking1959110
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Market segmentDesktop processorLaptop
Power efficiency1.8159.21
Architecture codenameTrinity (2012−2013)Dragon Range-HX (Zen 4) (2023−2024)
Release date2 October 2012 (12 years ago)4 January 2023 (1 year ago)

Detailed specifications

A10-5800B and Ryzen 9 7945HX basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores4 (Quad-Core)16 (Hexadeca-Core)
Threads432
Base clock speed3.8 GHz2.5 GHz
Boost clock speed4.2 GHz5.4 GHz
L1 cache128 KB (per core)64K (per core)
L2 cache1 MB (per core)1 MB (per core)
L3 cache0 KB64 MB (shared)
Chip lithography32 nmCCD = 5 nm, I/O = 6 nm
Die size246 mm22x 71 mm2
Maximum core temperatureno data100 °C
Maximum case temperature (TCase)74 °Cno data
Number of transistors1,178 million13,140 million
64 bit support++
Windows 11 compatibility-+
Unlocked multiplier-+

Compatibility

Information on A10-5800B and Ryzen 9 7945HX compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configuration11
SocketFM2FL1
Power consumption (TDP)100 Watt55 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by A10-5800B and Ryzen 9 7945HX. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

Instruction set extensionsno dataMMX, SSE, SSE2, SSE3, SSSE3, SSE4A, SSE4.1, SSE4.2, AVX, AVX2, AVX-512, BMI2, ABM, FMA, ADX, SMEP, SMAP, SMT, CPB, AES-NI, RDRAND, RDSEED, SHA, SME
AES-NI-+
FMA-+
AVX-+
Precision Boost 2no data+

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by A10-5800B and Ryzen 9 7945HX are enumerated here.

AMD-V++

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by A10-5800B and Ryzen 9 7945HX. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesDDR3DDR5

Graphics specifications

General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.

Integrated graphics card
Compare
AMD Radeon HD 7660DAMD Radeon 610M

Peripherals

Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by A10-5800B and Ryzen 9 7945HX.

PCIe versionno data5.0
PCI Express lanesno data28

Synthetic benchmark performance

Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark performance rating. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

A10-5800B 1.91
Ryzen 9 7945HX 34.41
+1702%

Passmark

Passmark CPU Mark is a widespread benchmark, consisting of 8 different types of workload, including integer and floating point math, extended instructions, compression, encryption and physics calculation. There is also one separate single-threaded scenario measuring single-core performance.

A10-5800B 3034
Ryzen 9 7945HX 54653
+1701%

GeekBench 5 Single-Core

GeekBench 5 Single-Core is a cross-platform application developed in the form of CPU tests that independently recreate certain real-world tasks with which to accurately measure performance. This version uses only a single CPU core.

A10-5800B 459
Ryzen 9 7945HX 2735
+496%

GeekBench 5 Multi-Core

GeekBench 5 Multi-Core is a cross-platform application developed in the form of CPU tests that independently recreate certain real-world tasks with which to accurately measure performance. This version uses all available CPU cores.

A10-5800B 1128
Ryzen 9 7945HX 15897
+1309%

Gaming performance

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 1.91 34.41
Integrated graphics card 1.30 2.85
Recency 2 October 2012 4 January 2023
Physical cores 4 16
Threads 4 32
Power consumption (TDP) 100 Watt 55 Watt

Ryzen 9 7945HX has a 1701.6% higher aggregate performance score, 119.2% faster integrated GPU, an age advantage of 10 years, 300% more physical cores and 700% more threads, and 81.8% lower power consumption.

The Ryzen 9 7945HX is our recommended choice as it beats the A10-5800B in performance tests.

Note that A10-5800B is a desktop processor while Ryzen 9 7945HX is a notebook one.


Should you still have questions on choice between A10-5800B and Ryzen 9 7945HX, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


AMD A10-5800B
A10-5800B
AMD Ryzen 9 7945HX
Ryzen 9 7945HX

Similar processor comparisons

We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


3.8 98 votes

Rate A10-5800B on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
4.6 627 votes

Rate Ryzen 9 7945HX on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about A10-5800B or Ryzen 9 7945HX, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.