Ryzen 7 3700U vs A10-5750M

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Aggregate performance score

A10-5750M
2013
4 cores / 4 threads, 35 Watt
1.41
Ryzen 7 3700U
2019
4 cores / 8 threads, 15 Watt
4.63
+228%

Ryzen 7 3700U outperforms A10-5750M by a whopping 228% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

Comparing A10-5750M and Ryzen 7 3700U processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in performance ranking21231226
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Market segmentLaptopLaptop
SeriesAMD A-SeriesAMD Ryzen 7
Architecture codenameRichland (2013−2014)Picasso-U (Zen+)
Release date1 June 2013 (11 years ago)6 January 2019 (5 years ago)
Current price$198 $625

Detailed specifications

A10-5750M and Ryzen 7 3700U basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores4 (Quad-Core)4 (Quad-Core)
Threads48
Base clock speed2.5 GHz2.3 GHz
Boost clock speed3.5 GHz4 GHz
L1 cache128 KB (per core)128K (per core)
L2 cache1 MB (per core)512K (per core)
L3 cache0 KB4 MB (shared)
Chip lithography32 nm12 nm
Die size246 mm2209.78 mm2
Maximum core temperatureno data105 °C
Maximum case temperature (TCase)71 °Cno data
Number of transistors1,178 million4500 Million
64 bit support++
Windows 11 compatibility-+
Unlocked multiplierNoNo

Compatibility

Information on A10-5750M and Ryzen 7 3700U compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configuration11 (Uniprocessor)
SocketFS1r2FP5
Power consumption (TDP)35 Watt15 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by A10-5750M and Ryzen 7 3700U. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

Instruction set extensions86x SSE (1, 2, 3, 3S, 4.1, 4.2, 4A),-64, AES, AVX, FMA, DDR3-1866 ControllerDDR4-2400, PCIe 3, MMX, SSE, SSE2, SSE3, SSSE3, SSE4A, SSE4.1, SSE4.2, AVX, AVX2, BMI2, ABM, FMA, ADX, SMEP, SMAP, SMT, CPB, AES-NI, RDRAND, RDSEED, SHA, SME
AES-NI++
FMA++
AVX++

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by A10-5750M and Ryzen 7 3700U are enumerated here.

AMD-V++

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by A10-5750M and Ryzen 7 3700U. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesDDR3DDR4
Maximum memory sizeno data64 GB
Max memory channelsno data2
Maximum memory bandwidthno data38.397 GB/s
ECC memory supportno data+

Graphics specifications

General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.

Integrated graphics card
Compare
AMD Radeon HD 8650GAMD Radeon RX Vega 10

Peripherals

Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by A10-5750M and Ryzen 7 3700U.

PCIe versionno data3.0
PCI Express lanesno data12

Synthetic benchmark performance

Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark performance rating. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

A10-5750M 1.41
Ryzen 7 3700U 4.63
+228%

Ryzen 7 3700U outperforms A10-5750M by 228% based on our aggregate benchmark results.


Passmark

Passmark CPU Mark is a widespread benchmark, consisting of 8 different types of workload, including integer and floating point math, extended instructions, compression, encryption and physics calculation. There is also one separate single-threaded scenario measuring single-core performance.

Benchmark coverage: 68%

A10-5750M 2174
Ryzen 7 3700U 7163
+229%

Ryzen 7 3700U outperforms A10-5750M by 229% in Passmark.

GeekBench 5 Single-Core

GeekBench 5 Single-Core is a cross-platform application developed in the form of CPU tests that independently recreate certain real-world tasks with which to accurately measure performance. This version uses only a single CPU core.

Benchmark coverage: 42%

A10-5750M 309
Ryzen 7 3700U 882
+185%

Ryzen 7 3700U outperforms A10-5750M by 185% in GeekBench 5 Single-Core.

GeekBench 5 Multi-Core

GeekBench 5 Multi-Core is a cross-platform application developed in the form of CPU tests that independently recreate certain real-world tasks with which to accurately measure performance. This version uses all available CPU cores.

Benchmark coverage: 42%

A10-5750M 677
Ryzen 7 3700U 2543
+276%

Ryzen 7 3700U outperforms A10-5750M by 276% in GeekBench 5 Multi-Core.

Cinebench 10 32-bit single-core

Cinebench R10 is an ancient ray tracing benchmark for processors by Maxon, authors of Cinema 4D. Its single core version uses just one CPU thread to render a futuristic looking motorcycle.

Benchmark coverage: 20%

A10-5750M 2579
Ryzen 7 3700U 4411
+71%

Ryzen 7 3700U outperforms A10-5750M by 71% in Cinebench 10 32-bit single-core.

Cinebench 10 32-bit multi-core

Cinebench Release 10 Multi Core is a variant of Cinebench R10 using all the processor threads. Possible number of threads is limited by 16 in this version.

Benchmark coverage: 19%

A10-5750M 6451
Ryzen 7 3700U 15461
+140%

Ryzen 7 3700U outperforms A10-5750M by 140% in Cinebench 10 32-bit multi-core.

3DMark06 CPU

3DMark06 is a discontinued DirectX 9 benchmark suite from Futuremark. Its CPU part contains two scenarios, one dedicated to artificial intelligence pathfinding, another to game physics using PhysX package.

Benchmark coverage: 19%

A10-5750M 3238
Ryzen 7 3700U 4595
+41.9%

Ryzen 7 3700U outperforms A10-5750M by 42% in 3DMark06 CPU.

wPrime 32

wPrime 32M is a math multi-thread processor test, which calculates square roots of first 32 million integer numbers. Its result is measured in seconds, so that the less is benchmark result, the faster the processor.

Benchmark coverage: 18%

A10-5750M 22.5
Ryzen 7 3700U 13.48
+66.9%

A10-5750M outperforms Ryzen 7 3700U by 67% in wPrime 32.

Cinebench 11.5 64-bit multi-core

Cinebench Release 11.5 Multi Core is a variant of Cinebench R11.5 which uses all the processor threads. A maximum of 64 threads is supported in this version.

Benchmark coverage: 17%

A10-5750M 2
Ryzen 7 3700U 8
+229%

Ryzen 7 3700U outperforms A10-5750M by 229% in Cinebench 11.5 64-bit multi-core.

Cinebench 15 64-bit multi-core

Cinebench Release 15 Multi Core is a variant of Cinebench R15 which uses all the processor threads.

Benchmark coverage: 15%

A10-5750M 209
Ryzen 7 3700U 672
+222%

Ryzen 7 3700U outperforms A10-5750M by 222% in Cinebench 15 64-bit multi-core.

Cinebench 15 64-bit single-core

Cinebench R15 (standing for Release 15) is a benchmark made by Maxon, authors of Cinema 4D. It was superseded by later versions of Cinebench, which use more modern variants of Cinema 4D engine. The Single Core version (sometimes called Single-Thread) only uses a single processor thread to render a room full of reflective spheres and light sources.

Benchmark coverage: 15%

A10-5750M 76
Ryzen 7 3700U 139
+82.9%

Ryzen 7 3700U outperforms A10-5750M by 83% in Cinebench 15 64-bit single-core.

Cinebench 11.5 64-bit single-core

Cinebench R11.5 is an old benchmark by Maxon, authors of Cinema 4D. It was superseded by later versions of Cinebench, which use more modern variants of Cinema 4D engine. The Single Core version loads a single thread with ray tracing to render a glossy room full of crystal spheres and light sources.

Benchmark coverage: 14%

A10-5750M 0.85
Ryzen 7 3700U 1.59
+87.1%

Ryzen 7 3700U outperforms A10-5750M by 87% in Cinebench 11.5 64-bit single-core.

TrueCrypt AES

TrueCrypt is a discontinued piece of software that was widely used for on-the-fly-encryption of disk partitions, now superseded by VeraCrypt. It contains several embedded performance tests, one of them being TrueCrypt AES, which measures data encryption speed using AES algorithm. Result is encryption speed in gigabytes per second.

Benchmark coverage: 13%

A10-5750M 1.5
Ryzen 7 3700U 3.8
+153%

Ryzen 7 3700U outperforms A10-5750M by 153% in TrueCrypt AES.

WinRAR 4.0

WinRAR 4.0 is an outdated version of a popular file archiver. It contains an internal speed test, using 'Best' setting of RAR compression on large chunks of randomly generated data. Its results are measured in kilobytes per second.

Benchmark coverage: 13%

A10-5750M 2035
Ryzen 7 3700U 2392
+17.5%

Ryzen 7 3700U outperforms A10-5750M by 18% in WinRAR 4.0.

x264 encoding pass 2

x264 Pass 2 is a slower variant of x264 video compression that produces a variable bit rate output file, which results in better quality since the higher bit rate is used when it is needed more. Benchmark result is still measured in frames per second.  

Benchmark coverage: 13%

A10-5750M 15
Ryzen 7 3700U 27
+80.7%

Ryzen 7 3700U outperforms A10-5750M by 81% in x264 encoding pass 2.

x264 encoding pass 1

x264 version 4.0 is a video encoding benchmark uses MPEG 4 x264 compression method to compress a sample HD (720p) video. Pass 1 is a faster variant that produces a constant bit rate output file. Its result is measured in frames per second, which means how many frames of the source video file were encoded per second.  

Benchmark coverage: 13%

A10-5750M 76
Ryzen 7 3700U 105
+37.9%

Ryzen 7 3700U outperforms A10-5750M by 38% in x264 encoding pass 1.

Geekbench 3 32-bit multi-core

Benchmark coverage: 5%

A10-5750M 4787
Ryzen 7 3700U 10238
+114%

Ryzen 7 3700U outperforms A10-5750M by 114% in Geekbench 3 32-bit multi-core.

Geekbench 3 32-bit single-core

Benchmark coverage: 5%

A10-5750M 1816
Ryzen 7 3700U 3003
+65.4%

Ryzen 7 3700U outperforms A10-5750M by 65% in Geekbench 3 32-bit single-core.

Geekbench 2

Benchmark coverage: 5%

A10-5750M 4742
Ryzen 7 3700U 10025
+111%

Ryzen 7 3700U outperforms A10-5750M by 111% in Geekbench 2.

Geekbench 4.0 64-bit multi-core

Benchmark coverage: 2%

A10-5750M 4963
Ryzen 7 3700U 9117
+83.7%

Ryzen 7 3700U outperforms A10-5750M by 84% in Geekbench 4.0 64-bit multi-core.

Geekbench 4.0 64-bit single-core

Benchmark coverage: 2%

A10-5750M 2175
Ryzen 7 3700U 3247
+49.3%

Ryzen 7 3700U outperforms A10-5750M by 49% in Geekbench 4.0 64-bit single-core.

Gaming performance

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 1.41 4.63
Integrated graphics card 1.37 4.24
Recency 1 June 2013 6 January 2019
Threads 4 8
Chip lithography 32 nm 12 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 35 Watt 15 Watt

The Ryzen 7 3700U is our recommended choice as it beats the A10-5750M in performance tests.


Should you still have questions on choice between A10-5750M and Ryzen 7 3700U, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


AMD A10-5750M
A10-5750M
AMD Ryzen 7 3700U
Ryzen 7 3700U

Similar processor comparisons

We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


3.8 248 votes

Rate A10-5750M on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
4.1 1379 votes

Rate Ryzen 7 3700U on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about A10-5750M or Ryzen 7 3700U, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.