FX-6330 vs A10-5700

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Aggregate performance score

A10-5700
2012
4 cores / 4 threads, 65 Watt
1.73
FX-6330
2015
6 cores / 6 threads, 125 Watt
2.79
+61.3%

FX-6330 outperforms A10-5700 by an impressive 61% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

Comparing A10-5700 and FX-6330 processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in the ranking20321678
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Market segmentDesktop processorDesktop processor
Power efficiency2.522.11
Architecture codenameTrinity (2012−2013)Vishera (2012−2015)
Release date2 October 2012 (12 years ago)15 December 2015 (8 years ago)

Detailed specifications

A10-5700 and FX-6330 basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores4 (Quad-Core)6 (Hexa-Core)
Threads46
Base clock speed3.4 GHz3.6 GHz
Boost clock speed4 GHz4.2 GHz
L1 cache128 KB (per core)288 KB
L2 cache1 MB (per core)6 MB
L3 cache0 KB8 MB (shared)
Chip lithography32 nm32 nm
Die size246 mm2315 mm2
Maximum case temperature (TCase)71 °Cno data
Number of transistors1,178 million1,200 million
64 bit support++
Windows 11 compatibility--

Compatibility

Information on A10-5700 and FX-6330 compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configuration11
SocketFM2AM3+
Power consumption (TDP)65 Watt125 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by A10-5700 and FX-6330. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

AES-NI-+
FMA-+
AVX-+

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by A10-5700 and FX-6330 are enumerated here.

AMD-V++

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by A10-5700 and FX-6330. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesDDR3DDR3

Graphics specifications

General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.

Integrated graphics cardAMD Radeon HD 7660DOn certain motherboards (Chipset feature)

Peripherals

Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by A10-5700 and FX-6330.

PCIe versionno data2.0

Synthetic benchmark performance

Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark performance rating. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

A10-5700 1.73
FX-6330 2.79
+61.3%

Passmark

Passmark CPU Mark is a widespread benchmark, consisting of 8 different types of workload, including integer and floating point math, extended instructions, compression, encryption and physics calculation. There is also one separate single-threaded scenario measuring single-core performance.

A10-5700 2742
FX-6330 4433
+61.7%

Gaming performance

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 1.73 2.79
Recency 2 October 2012 15 December 2015
Physical cores 4 6
Threads 4 6
Power consumption (TDP) 65 Watt 125 Watt

A10-5700 has 92.3% lower power consumption.

FX-6330, on the other hand, has a 61.3% higher aggregate performance score, an age advantage of 3 years, and 50% more physical cores and 50% more threads.

The FX-6330 is our recommended choice as it beats the A10-5700 in performance tests.


Should you still have questions on choice between A10-5700 and FX-6330, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


AMD A10-5700
A10-5700
AMD FX-6330
FX-6330

Similar processor comparisons

We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


3.5 167 votes

Rate A10-5700 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
4.3 39 votes

Rate FX-6330 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about A10-5700 or FX-6330, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.