Ryzen 7 5700U vs A10-4655M

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Aggregate performance score

A10-4655M
2012
4 cores / 4 threads, 25 Watt
1.07
Ryzen 7 5700U
2021
8 cores / 16 threads, 15 Watt
10.25
+858%

Ryzen 7 5700U outperforms A10-4655M by a whopping 858% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

Comparing A10-4655M and Ryzen 7 5700U processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in performance ranking2326704
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Market segmentLaptopLaptop
SeriesAMD A-SeriesAMD Lucienne (Zen 2, Ryzen 5000)
Architecture codenameTrinity (2012−2013)Lucienne-U (Zen 2)
Release date15 May 2012 (12 years ago)12 January 2021 (3 years ago)
Current price$83 no data

Detailed specifications

A10-4655M and Ryzen 7 5700U basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores4 (Quad-Core)8 (Octa-Core)
Threads416
Base clock speed2 GHz1.8 GHz
Boost clock speed2.8 GHz4.3 GHz
L1 cache192 KB64K (per core)
L2 cache4 MB (shared)512K (per core)
L3 cache0 KB8 MB (shared)
Chip lithography32 nm7 nm
Die size246 mm2156 mm2
Maximum core temperatureno data105 °C
Maximum case temperature (TCase)100 °Cno data
Number of transistors1,178 million9,800 million
64 bit support++
Windows 11 compatibility-+
Unlocked multiplierNoNo

Compatibility

Information on A10-4655M and Ryzen 7 5700U compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configuration11
SocketFP2FP6
Power consumption (TDP)25 Watt15 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by A10-4655M and Ryzen 7 5700U. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

Instruction set extensions86x SSE (1, 2, 3, 3S, 4.1, 4.2, 4A),-64, AES, AVX, FMADDR4-3200/LPDDR4-4266 RAM, PCIe 3, MMX, SSE, SSE2, SSE3, SSSE3, SSE4A, SSE4.1, SSE4.2, AVX, AVX2, BMI2, ABM, FMA, ADX, SMEP, SMAP, SMT, CPB, AES-NI, RDRAND, RDSEED, SHA, SME
AES-NI++
FMA++
AVX++

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by A10-4655M and Ryzen 7 5700U are enumerated here.

AMD-V++

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by A10-4655M and Ryzen 7 5700U. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesunknown Dual-channelDDR4
Maximum memory sizeno data64 GB

Graphics specifications

General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.

Integrated graphics card
Compare
AMD Radeon HD 7620GAMD Radeon RX Vega 8 (Ryzen 4000/5000)

Peripherals

Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by A10-4655M and Ryzen 7 5700U.

PCIe versionno data3.0
PCI Express lanesno data12

Synthetic benchmark performance

Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark performance rating. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

A10-4655M 1.07
Ryzen 7 5700U 10.25
+858%

Ryzen 7 5700U outperforms A10-4655M by 858% based on our aggregate benchmark results.


Passmark

Passmark CPU Mark is a widespread benchmark, consisting of 8 different types of workload, including integer and floating point math, extended instructions, compression, encryption and physics calculation. There is also one separate single-threaded scenario measuring single-core performance.

Benchmark coverage: 68%

A10-4655M 1655
Ryzen 7 5700U 15847
+858%

Ryzen 7 5700U outperforms A10-4655M by 858% in Passmark.

GeekBench 5 Single-Core

GeekBench 5 Single-Core is a cross-platform application developed in the form of CPU tests that independently recreate certain real-world tasks with which to accurately measure performance. This version uses only a single CPU core.

Benchmark coverage: 42%

A10-4655M 277
Ryzen 7 5700U 1409
+409%

Ryzen 7 5700U outperforms A10-4655M by 409% in GeekBench 5 Single-Core.

GeekBench 5 Multi-Core

GeekBench 5 Multi-Core is a cross-platform application developed in the form of CPU tests that independently recreate certain real-world tasks with which to accurately measure performance. This version uses all available CPU cores.

Benchmark coverage: 42%

A10-4655M 583
Ryzen 7 5700U 5467
+838%

Ryzen 7 5700U outperforms A10-4655M by 838% in GeekBench 5 Multi-Core.

Cinebench 10 32-bit single-core

Cinebench R10 is an ancient ray tracing benchmark for processors by Maxon, authors of Cinema 4D. Its single core version uses just one CPU thread to render a futuristic looking motorcycle.

Benchmark coverage: 20%

A10-4655M 1137
Ryzen 7 5700U 5780
+408%

Ryzen 7 5700U outperforms A10-4655M by 408% in Cinebench 10 32-bit single-core.

Cinebench 10 32-bit multi-core

Cinebench Release 10 Multi Core is a variant of Cinebench R10 using all the processor threads. Possible number of threads is limited by 16 in this version.

Benchmark coverage: 19%

A10-4655M 4530
Ryzen 7 5700U 31131
+587%

Ryzen 7 5700U outperforms A10-4655M by 587% in Cinebench 10 32-bit multi-core.

3DMark06 CPU

3DMark06 is a discontinued DirectX 9 benchmark suite from Futuremark. Its CPU part contains two scenarios, one dedicated to artificial intelligence pathfinding, another to game physics using PhysX package.

Benchmark coverage: 19%

A10-4655M 2161
Ryzen 7 5700U 11662
+440%

Ryzen 7 5700U outperforms A10-4655M by 440% in 3DMark06 CPU.

wPrime 32

wPrime 32M is a math multi-thread processor test, which calculates square roots of first 32 million integer numbers. Its result is measured in seconds, so that the less is benchmark result, the faster the processor.

Benchmark coverage: 18%

A10-4655M 40
Ryzen 7 5700U 3.49
+1046%

A10-4655M outperforms Ryzen 7 5700U by 1046% in wPrime 32.

Cinebench 11.5 64-bit multi-core

Cinebench Release 11.5 Multi Core is a variant of Cinebench R11.5 which uses all the processor threads. A maximum of 64 threads is supported in this version.

Benchmark coverage: 17%

A10-4655M 2
Ryzen 7 5700U 17
+916%

Ryzen 7 5700U outperforms A10-4655M by 916% in Cinebench 11.5 64-bit multi-core.

Cinebench 11.5 64-bit single-core

Cinebench R11.5 is an old benchmark by Maxon, authors of Cinema 4D. It was superseded by later versions of Cinebench, which use more modern variants of Cinema 4D engine. The Single Core version loads a single thread with ray tracing to render a glossy room full of crystal spheres and light sources.

Benchmark coverage: 14%

A10-4655M 0.52
Ryzen 7 5700U 2.18
+319%

Ryzen 7 5700U outperforms A10-4655M by 319% in Cinebench 11.5 64-bit single-core.

TrueCrypt AES

TrueCrypt is a discontinued piece of software that was widely used for on-the-fly-encryption of disk partitions, now superseded by VeraCrypt. It contains several embedded performance tests, one of them being TrueCrypt AES, which measures data encryption speed using AES algorithm. Result is encryption speed in gigabytes per second.

Benchmark coverage: 13%

A10-4655M 1
Ryzen 7 5700U 9.2
+868%

Ryzen 7 5700U outperforms A10-4655M by 868% in TrueCrypt AES.

WinRAR 4.0

WinRAR 4.0 is an outdated version of a popular file archiver. It contains an internal speed test, using 'Best' setting of RAR compression on large chunks of randomly generated data. Its results are measured in kilobytes per second.

Benchmark coverage: 13%

A10-4655M 1263
Ryzen 7 5700U 3763
+198%

Ryzen 7 5700U outperforms A10-4655M by 198% in WinRAR 4.0.

Gaming performance

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 1.07 10.25
Integrated graphics card 0.94 9.08
Recency 15 May 2012 12 January 2021
Physical cores 4 8
Threads 4 16
Chip lithography 32 nm 7 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 25 Watt 15 Watt

The Ryzen 7 5700U is our recommended choice as it beats the A10-4655M in performance tests.


Should you still have questions on choice between A10-4655M and Ryzen 7 5700U, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


AMD A10-4655M
A10-4655M
AMD Ryzen 7 5700U
Ryzen 7 5700U

Similar processor comparisons

We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


3.7 60 votes

Rate A10-4655M on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
4.1 2572 votes

Rate Ryzen 7 5700U on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about A10-4655M or Ryzen 7 5700U, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.