EPYC 7413 vs A10-4655M

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Aggregate performance score

A10-4655M
2012
4 cores / 4 threads, 25 Watt
0.94
EPYC 7413
2021
24 cores / 48 threads, 180 Watt
28.71
+2954%

EPYC 7413 outperforms A10-4655M by a whopping 2954% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

Comparing processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in the ranking2658179
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluationno data13.99
Market segmentLaptopServer
SeriesAMD A-SeriesAMD EPYC
Power efficiency1.596.76
DesignerAMDAMD
Manufacturerno dataTSMC
Architecture codenameTrinity (2012−2013)Milan (2021−2023)
Release date15 May 2012 (13 years ago)15 March 2021 (4 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)no data$1,825

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance per price, higher is better.

no data

Performance to price scatter graph

Detailed specifications

A10-4655M and EPYC 7413 basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores4 (Quad-Core)24 (Tetracosa-Core)
Threads448
Base clock speed2 GHz2.65 GHz
Boost clock speed2.8 GHz3.6 GHz
Multiplierno data26.5
L1 cache192 KB64 KB (per core)
L2 cache4 MB (shared)512 KB (per core)
L3 cache0 KB128 MB (shared)
Chip lithography32 nm7 nm+
Die size246 mm24x 81 mm2
Maximum case temperature (TCase)100 °Cno data
Number of transistors1,178 million16,600 million
64 bit support++
Windows 11 compatibility-+

Compatibility

Information on A10-4655M and EPYC 7413 compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configuration12
SocketFP2SP3
Power consumption (TDP)25 Watt180 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by A10-4655M and EPYC 7413. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

Instruction set extensions86x SSE (1, 2, 3, 3S, 4.1, 4.2, 4A),-64, AES, AVX, FMAno data
AES-NI++
FMA+-
AVX++

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by A10-4655M and EPYC 7413 are enumerated here.

AMD-V++

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by A10-4655M and EPYC 7413. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesunknown Dual-channelDDR4-3200
Maximum memory sizeno data4 TiB
Maximum memory bandwidthno data204.795 GB/s

Graphics specifications

General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.

Integrated graphics cardAMD Radeon HD 7620G (360 - 497 MHz)N/A

Peripherals

Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by A10-4655M and EPYC 7413.

PCIe versionno data4.0
PCI Express lanesno data128

Synthetic benchmark performance

Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark performance rating.

A10-4655M 0.94
EPYC 7413 28.71
+2954%

Passmark

Passmark CPU Mark is a widespread benchmark, consisting of 8 different types of workload, including integer and floating point math, extended instructions, compression, encryption and physics calculation. There is also one separate single-threaded scenario measuring single-core performance. Other than that, Passmark measures multi-core performance.

A10-4655M 1655
EPYC 7413 50641
+2960%

GeekBench 5 Single-Core

GeekBench 5 Single-Core is a cross-platform application developed in the form of CPU tests that independently recreate certain real-world tasks with which to accurately measure performance. This version uses only a single CPU core.

A10-4655M 278
EPYC 7413 1538
+453%

GeekBench 5 Multi-Core

GeekBench 5 Multi-Core is a cross-platform application developed in the form of CPU tests that independently recreate certain real-world tasks with which to accurately measure performance. This version uses all available CPU cores.

A10-4655M 590
EPYC 7413 12804
+2070%

Gaming performance

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 0.94 28.71
Recency 15 May 2012 15 March 2021
Physical cores 4 24
Threads 4 48
Chip lithography 32 nm 7 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 25 Watt 180 Watt

A10-4655M has 620% lower power consumption.

EPYC 7413, on the other hand, has a 2954.3% higher aggregate performance score, an age advantage of 8 years, 500% more physical cores and 1100% more threads, and a 357.1% more advanced lithography process.

The AMD EPYC 7413 is our recommended choice as it beats the AMD A10-4655M in performance tests.

Be aware that A10-4655M is a notebook processor while EPYC 7413 is a server/workstation one.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


AMD A10-4655M
A10-4655M
AMD EPYC 7413
EPYC 7413

Other comparisons

We've compiled a selection of CPU comparisons, ranging from closely matched processors to other comparisons that may be of interest.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


3.7 67 votes

Rate A10-4655M on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
4.7 3 votes

Rate EPYC 7413 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Comments

Here you can give us your opinion about processors A10-4655M and EPYC 7413, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report bugs or inaccuracies on the site.