A4 PRO-3340B vs A10-4655M

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Aggregate performance score

A10-4655M
2012
4 cores / 4 threads, 25 Watt
0.95

A4 PRO-3340B outperforms A10-4655M by a minimal 3% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

Comparing processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in the ranking27692742
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Market segmentLaptopLaptop
SeriesAMD A-Seriesno data
Power efficiency1.601.65
DesignerAMDAMD
Manufacturerno dataGlobalFoundries
Architecture codenameTrinity (2012−2013)Kabini (2013−2014)
Release date15 May 2012 (13 years ago)20 December 2014 (11 years ago)

Detailed specifications

A10-4655M and A4 PRO-3340B basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores4 (Quad-Core)4 (Quad-Core)
Threads44
Base clock speed2 GHz2.2 GHz
Boost clock speed2.8 GHz2.2 GHz
L1 cache192 KBno data
L2 cache4 MB (shared)2048 KB
L3 cache0 KBno data
Chip lithography32 nm28 nm
Die size246 mm2107 mm2
Maximum case temperature (TCase)100 °C90 °C
Number of transistors1,178 millionno data
64 bit support++
Windows 11 compatibility-no data

Compatibility

Information on A10-4655M and A4 PRO-3340B compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configuration11
SocketFP2FT3
Power consumption (TDP)25 Watt25 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by A10-4655M and A4 PRO-3340B. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

Instruction set extensions86x SSE (1, 2, 3, 3S, 4.1, 4.2, 4A),-64, AES, AVX, FMAno data
AES-NI++
FMA+FMA4
AVX++
PowerNow-+
PowerGating-+
VirusProtect-+
RAID-+

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by A10-4655M and A4 PRO-3340B are enumerated here.

AMD-V++
IOMMU 2.0-+

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by A10-4655M and A4 PRO-3340B. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesunknown Dual-channelDDR3/DDR3L-1600
Max memory channelsno data1

Graphics specifications

General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.

Integrated graphics cardAMD Radeon HD 7620G (360 - 497 MHz)AMD Radeon™ HD 8240 Graphics
iGPU core countno data2
จำนวนพาธไลน์no data128
Enduro-+
Switchable graphics-+
UVD-+
VCE-+

Graphics interfaces

Available interfaces and connections of A10-4655M and A4 PRO-3340B integrated GPUs.

DisplayPort-+
HDMI-+

Graphics API support

APIs supported by A10-4655M and A4 PRO-3340B integrated GPUs, sometimes API versions are included.

DirectXno dataDirectX® 12
Vulkan-+

Peripherals

Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by A10-4655M and A4 PRO-3340B.

PCIe versionno data2.0
PCI Express lanesno data8

Synthetic benchmarks

Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark performance rating.

A10-4655M 0.95
A4 PRO-3340B 0.98
+3.2%

Passmark

Passmark CPU Mark is a widespread benchmark, consisting of 8 different types of workload, including integer and floating point math, extended instructions, compression, encryption and physics calculation. There is also one separate single-threaded scenario measuring single-core performance. Other than that, Passmark measures multi-core performance.

A10-4655M 1654
Samples: 171
A4 PRO-3340B 1719
+3.9%
Samples: 9

Gaming performance

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 0.95 0.98
Recency 15 May 2012 20 December 2014
Chip lithography 32 nm 28 nm

A4 PRO-3340B has a 3.2% higher aggregate performance score, an age advantage of 2 years, and a 14.3% more advanced lithography process.

Given the minimal performance differences, no clear winner can be declared between AMD A10-4655M and AMD A4 PRO-3340B.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


AMD A10-4655M
A10-4655M
AMD A4 PRO-3340B
A4 PRO-3340B

Other comparisons

We've compiled a selection of CPU comparisons, ranging from closely matched processors to other comparisons that may be of interest.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


3.8 68 votes

Rate A10-4655M on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
5 1 vote

Rate A4 PRO-3340B on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Comments

Here you can give us your opinion about processors A10-4655M and A4 PRO-3340B, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report bugs or inaccuracies on the site.