Mobile Sempron SI-42 vs A10-4600M

VS

Aggregate performance score

A10-4600M
2012
4 cores / 4 threads, 35 Watt
1.22
+481%
Mobile Sempron SI-42
2009
1 core / 1 thread, 25 Watt
0.21

A10-4600M outperforms Mobile Sempron SI-42 by a whopping 481% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

Comparing A10-4600M and Mobile Sempron SI-42 processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in the ranking23363219
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Market segmentLaptopLaptop
SeriesAMD A-SeriesAMD Mobile Sempron
Power efficiency3.300.79
Architecture codenameTrinity (2012−2013)Sable (2008−2009)
Release date15 May 2012 (12 years ago)1 September 2009 (15 years ago)

Detailed specifications

A10-4600M and Mobile Sempron SI-42 basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores4 (Quad-Core)1 (Single-Core)
Threads41
Base clock speed2.3 GHzno data
Boost clock speed3.2 GHz2.1 GHz
Bus rateno data1800 MHz
L1 cache192 KB128 KB
L2 cache4 MB (shared)512 KB
L3 cache0 KBno data
Chip lithography32 nm65 nm
Die size246 mm2no data
Maximum core temperatureno data100 °C
Number of transistors1,178 millionno data
64 bit support++
Windows 11 compatibility--

Compatibility

Information on A10-4600M and Mobile Sempron SI-42 compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configuration1no data
SocketFS1r2S1g2
Power consumption (TDP)35 Watt25 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by A10-4600M and Mobile Sempron SI-42. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

Instruction set extensions86x SSE (1, 2, 3, 3S, 4.1, 4.2, 4A),-64, AES, AVX, FMA65 nm, 1.075 - 1.125
AES-NI+-
FMA+-
AVX+-

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by A10-4600M and Mobile Sempron SI-42 are enumerated here.

AMD-V+-

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by A10-4600M and Mobile Sempron SI-42. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesDDR3no data

Graphics specifications

General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.

Integrated graphics cardAMD Radeon HD 7660G (497 - 686 MHz)no data

Synthetic benchmark performance

Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark performance rating. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

A10-4600M 1.22
+481%
Mobile Sempron SI-42 0.21

3DMark06 CPU

3DMark06 is a discontinued DirectX 9 benchmark suite from Futuremark. Its CPU part contains two scenarios, one dedicated to artificial intelligence pathfinding, another to game physics using PhysX package.

A10-4600M 2866
+264%
Mobile Sempron SI-42 787

wPrime 32

wPrime 32M is a math multi-thread processor test, which calculates square roots of first 32 million integer numbers. Its result is measured in seconds, so that the less is benchmark result, the faster the processor.

A10-4600M 26.49
+187%
Mobile Sempron SI-42 76

Gaming performance

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 1.22 0.21
Recency 15 May 2012 1 September 2009
Physical cores 4 1
Threads 4 1
Chip lithography 32 nm 65 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 35 Watt 25 Watt

A10-4600M has a 481% higher aggregate performance score, an age advantage of 2 years, 300% more physical cores and 300% more threads, and a 103.1% more advanced lithography process.

Mobile Sempron SI-42, on the other hand, has 40% lower power consumption.

The A10-4600M is our recommended choice as it beats the Mobile Sempron SI-42 in performance tests.


Should you still have questions on choice between A10-4600M and Mobile Sempron SI-42, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


AMD A10-4600M
A10-4600M
AMD Mobile Sempron SI-42
Mobile Sempron SI-42

Similar processor comparisons

We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


3.9 506 votes

Rate A10-4600M on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.1 14 votes

Rate Mobile Sempron SI-42 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about A10-4600M or Mobile Sempron SI-42, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.