i3-10105 vs A10-4600M

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Aggregate performance score

A10-4600M
2012
4 cores / 4 threads, 35 Watt
1.25
Core i3-10105
2021
4 cores / 8 threads, 65 Watt
5.54
+343%

i3-10105 outperforms A10-4600M by a whopping 343% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

Comparing A10-4600M and Core i3-10105 processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in performance ranking22801128
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Market segmentLaptopDesktop processor
SeriesAMD A-Seriesno data
Architecture codenameTrinity (2012−2013)Comet Lake-R (2021)
Release date15 May 2012 (12 years ago)16 March 2021 (3 years ago)

Detailed specifications

A10-4600M and Core i3-10105 basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores4 (Quad-Core)4 (Quad-Core)
Threads48
Base clock speed2.3 GHz3.7 GHz
Boost clock speed3.2 GHz4.4 GHz
Bus rateno data8 GT/s
L1 cache192 KB64 KB (per core)
L2 cache4 MB256 KB (per core)
L3 cache0 KB6 MB (shared)
Chip lithography32 nm14 nm
Die size246 mm2no data
Maximum core temperatureno data100 °C
Maximum case temperature (TCase)no data72 °C
Number of transistors1303 Millionno data
64 bit support++
Windows 11 compatibility-+

Compatibility

Information on A10-4600M and Core i3-10105 compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configuration11
SocketFS1r2FCLGA1200
Power consumption (TDP)35 Watt65 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by A10-4600M and Core i3-10105. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

Instruction set extensions86x SSE (1, 2, 3, 3S, 4.1, 4.2, 4A),-64, AES, AVX, FMAIntel® SSE4.1, Intel® SSE4.2, Intel® AVX2
AES-NI++
FMA+-
AVX++
Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST)no data+
Turbo Boost Technologyno data2.0
Hyper-Threading Technologyno data+
Idle Statesno data+
Thermal Monitoring-+
Turbo Boost Max 3.0no data-
Statusno dataLaunched

Security technologies

A10-4600M and Core i3-10105 technologies aimed at improving security, for example, by protecting against hacks.

TXTno data+
EDBno data+
Secure Keyno data+
Identity Protection-+
SGXno dataYes with Intel® ME
OS Guardno data+

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by A10-4600M and Core i3-10105 are enumerated here.

AMD-V+-
VT-dno data+
VT-xno data+
EPTno data+

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by A10-4600M and Core i3-10105. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesDDR3DDR4-2666
Maximum memory sizeno data128 GB
Max memory channelsno data2
Maximum memory bandwidthno data41.6 GB/s

Graphics specifications

General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.

Integrated graphics card
Compare
AMD Radeon HD 7660GIntel UHD Graphics 630
Max video memoryno data64 GB
Quick Sync Video-+
Clear Videono data+
Clear Video HDno data+
Graphics max frequencyno data1.1 GHz
InTru 3Dno data+

Graphics interfaces

Available interfaces and connections of A10-4600M and Core i3-10105 integrated GPUs.

Number of displays supportedno data3

Graphics image quality

Maximum display resolutions supported by A10-4600M and Core i3-10105 integrated GPUs, including resolutions over different interfaces.

4K resolution supportno data+
Max resolution over HDMI 1.4no data4096 x 2160@30Hz
Max resolution over eDPno data4096 x 2304@60Hz
Max resolution over DisplayPortno data4096 x 2304@60Hz

Graphics API support

APIs supported by A10-4600M and Core i3-10105 integrated GPUs, sometimes API versions are included.

DirectXno data12
OpenGLno data4.5

Peripherals

Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by A10-4600M and Core i3-10105.

PCIe versionno data3.0
PCI Express lanesno data16

Synthetic benchmark performance

Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark performance rating. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

A10-4600M 1.25
i3-10105 5.54
+343%

Passmark

Passmark CPU Mark is a widespread benchmark, consisting of 8 different types of workload, including integer and floating point math, extended instructions, compression, encryption and physics calculation. There is also one separate single-threaded scenario measuring single-core performance.

A10-4600M 1938
i3-10105 8565
+342%

GeekBench 5 Single-Core

GeekBench 5 Single-Core is a cross-platform application developed in the form of CPU tests that independently recreate certain real-world tasks with which to accurately measure performance. This version uses only a single CPU core.

A10-4600M 340
i3-10105 1481
+336%

GeekBench 5 Multi-Core

GeekBench 5 Multi-Core is a cross-platform application developed in the form of CPU tests that independently recreate certain real-world tasks with which to accurately measure performance. This version uses all available CPU cores.

A10-4600M 730
i3-10105 4325
+492%

Gaming performance

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 1.25 5.54
Integrated graphics card 1.23 3.09
Recency 15 May 2012 16 March 2021
Threads 4 8
Chip lithography 32 nm 14 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 35 Watt 65 Watt

A10-4600M has 85.7% lower power consumption.

i3-10105, on the other hand, has a 343.2% higher aggregate performance score, 151.2% faster integrated GPU, an age advantage of 8 years, 100% more threads, and a 128.6% more advanced lithography process.

The Core i3-10105 is our recommended choice as it beats the A10-4600M in performance tests.

Be aware that A10-4600M is a notebook processor while Core i3-10105 is a desktop one.


Should you still have questions on choice between A10-4600M and Core i3-10105, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


AMD A10-4600M
A10-4600M
Intel Core i3-10105
Core i3-10105

Similar processor comparisons

We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


3.9 494 votes

Rate A10-4600M on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
4.2 782 votes

Rate Core i3-10105 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about A10-4600M or Core i3-10105, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.