A8-7200P vs A10-4600M

VS

Aggregate performance score

A10-4600M
2012
4 cores / 4 threads, 35 Watt
1.22
A8-7200P
2014
4 cores / 4 threads, 35 Watt
1.36
+11.5%

A8-7200P outperforms A10-4600M by a moderate 11% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

Comparing A10-4600M and A8-7200P processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in the ranking23362252
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Market segmentLaptopLaptop
SeriesAMD A-SeriesAMD Kaveri
Power efficiency3.303.68
Architecture codenameTrinity (2012−2013)Kaveri (2014−2015)
Release date15 May 2012 (12 years ago)4 June 2014 (10 years ago)

Detailed specifications

A10-4600M and A8-7200P basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores4 (Quad-Core)4 (Quad-Core)
Threads44
Base clock speed2.3 GHz2.4 GHz
Boost clock speed3.2 GHz3.3 GHz
L1 cache192 KBno data
L2 cache4 MB (shared)4096 KB
L3 cache0 KBno data
Chip lithography32 nm28 nm
Die size246 mm2245 mm2
Maximum core temperatureno data102 °C
Number of transistors1,178 million2410 Million
64 bit support++
Windows 11 compatibility--

Compatibility

Information on A10-4600M and A8-7200P compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configuration1no data
SocketFS1r2FP3
Power consumption (TDP)35 Watt35 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by A10-4600M and A8-7200P. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

Instruction set extensions86x SSE (1, 2, 3, 3S, 4.1, 4.2, 4A),-64, AES, AVX, FMA86x SSE (1, 2, 3, 3S, 4.1, 4.2, 4A),-64, AES, AVX, FMA
AES-NI++
FMA++
AVX++
FRTC-+
TrueAudio-+
PowerNow-+
PowerGating-+
Out-of-band client management-+
VirusProtect-+
HSA-+

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by A10-4600M and A8-7200P are enumerated here.

AMD-V++
IOMMU 2.0-+

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by A10-4600M and A8-7200P. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesDDR3DDR3-1866
Max memory channelsno data2

Graphics specifications

General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.

Integrated graphics card
Compare
AMD Radeon HD 7660G (497 - 686 MHz)AMD Radeon R5 Graphics
iGPU core countno data4
Enduro-+
Switchable graphics-+
UVD-+
VCE-+

Graphics interfaces

Available interfaces and connections of A10-4600M and A8-7200P integrated GPUs.

DisplayPort-+
HDMI-+

Graphics API support

APIs supported by A10-4600M and A8-7200P integrated GPUs, sometimes API versions are included.

DirectXno dataDirectX® 12
Vulkan-+

Peripherals

Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by A10-4600M and A8-7200P.

PCIe versionno data3.0

Synthetic benchmark performance

Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark performance rating. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

A10-4600M 1.22
A8-7200P 1.36
+11.5%

Passmark

Passmark CPU Mark is a widespread benchmark, consisting of 8 different types of workload, including integer and floating point math, extended instructions, compression, encryption and physics calculation. There is also one separate single-threaded scenario measuring single-core performance.

A10-4600M 1938
A8-7200P 2154
+11.1%

GeekBench 5 Single-Core

GeekBench 5 Single-Core is a cross-platform application developed in the form of CPU tests that independently recreate certain real-world tasks with which to accurately measure performance. This version uses only a single CPU core.

A10-4600M 342
A8-7200P 379
+10.8%

GeekBench 5 Multi-Core

GeekBench 5 Multi-Core is a cross-platform application developed in the form of CPU tests that independently recreate certain real-world tasks with which to accurately measure performance. This version uses all available CPU cores.

A10-4600M 726
A8-7200P 1020
+40.5%

Gaming performance

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 1.22 1.36
Recency 15 May 2012 4 June 2014
Chip lithography 32 nm 28 nm

A8-7200P has a 11.5% higher aggregate performance score, an age advantage of 2 years, and a 14.3% more advanced lithography process.

The A8-7200P is our recommended choice as it beats the A10-4600M in performance tests.


Should you still have questions on choice between A10-4600M and A8-7200P, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


AMD A10-4600M
A10-4600M
AMD A8-7200P
A8-7200P

Similar processor comparisons

We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


3.9 506 votes

Rate A10-4600M on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
2.8 5 votes

Rate A8-7200P on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about A10-4600M or A8-7200P, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.