Ryzen 9 6900HX vs 3020e

VS

Aggregate performance score

3020e
2020
2 cores / 2 threads, 6 Watt
1.59
Ryzen 9 6900HX
2022
8 cores / 16 threads, 45 Watt
16.18
+918%

Ryzen 9 6900HX outperforms 3020e by a whopping 918% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

Comparing 3020e and Ryzen 9 6900HX processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in the ranking2119436
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Market segmentLaptopLaptop
SeriesAMD Raven Ridge (Ryzen 2000 APU)AMD Rembrandt (Zen 3+)
Power efficiency24.1632.79
Architecture codenameDali (Zen) (2020)Rembrandt-H (Zen 3+) (2022)
Release date4 August 2020 (4 years ago)January 2022 (2 years ago)

Detailed specifications

3020e and Ryzen 9 6900HX basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores2 (Dual-core)8 (Octa-Core)
Threads216
Base clock speed1.2 GHz3.3 GHz
Boost clock speed2.6 GHz4.9 GHz
L1 cache192 KB64K (per core)
L2 cache1 MB512K (per core)
L3 cache4 MB16 MB (shared)
Chip lithography14 nm6 nm
Die sizeno data208 mm2
Maximum core temperature105 °C95 °C
64 bit support++
Windows 11 compatibility++
Unlocked multiplier-+

Compatibility

Information on 3020e and Ryzen 9 6900HX compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configurationno data1
SocketFT5FP7
Power consumption (TDP)6 Watt45 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by 3020e and Ryzen 9 6900HX. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

Instruction set extensionsMMX, SSE, SSE2, SSE3, SSSE3, SSE4A, SSE4.1, SSE4.2, AVX, AVX2, BMI2, ABM, FMA, ADX, SMEP, SMAP, CPB, AES-NI, RDRAND, RDSEED, SHA, SMEMMX (+), SSE, SSE2, SSE3, SSSE3, SSE4.1, SSE4.2, SSE4A, AES, AVX, AVX2, FMA3, SHA
AES-NI++
FMA+-
AVX++
Precision Boost 2no data+

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by 3020e and Ryzen 9 6900HX are enumerated here.

AMD-V-+

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by 3020e and Ryzen 9 6900HX. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesDDR4DDR5

Graphics specifications

General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.

Integrated graphics card
Compare
AMD Radeon RX Vega 3AMD Radeon 680M

Peripherals

Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by 3020e and Ryzen 9 6900HX.

PCIe versionno data4.0
PCI Express lanesno data20

Synthetic benchmark performance

Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark performance rating. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

3020e 1.59
Ryzen 9 6900HX 16.18
+918%

Passmark

Passmark CPU Mark is a widespread benchmark, consisting of 8 different types of workload, including integer and floating point math, extended instructions, compression, encryption and physics calculation. There is also one separate single-threaded scenario measuring single-core performance.

3020e 2439
Ryzen 9 6900HX 24765
+915%

GeekBench 5 Single-Core

GeekBench 5 Single-Core is a cross-platform application developed in the form of CPU tests that independently recreate certain real-world tasks with which to accurately measure performance. This version uses only a single CPU core.

3020e 662
Ryzen 9 6900HX 2010
+204%

GeekBench 5 Multi-Core

GeekBench 5 Multi-Core is a cross-platform application developed in the form of CPU tests that independently recreate certain real-world tasks with which to accurately measure performance. This version uses all available CPU cores.

3020e 1083
Ryzen 9 6900HX 9719
+797%

wPrime 32

wPrime 32M is a math multi-thread processor test, which calculates square roots of first 32 million integer numbers. Its result is measured in seconds, so that the less is benchmark result, the faster the processor.

3020e 29
Ryzen 9 6900HX 3.77
+669%

Cinebench 15 64-bit multi-core

Cinebench Release 15 Multi Core is a variant of Cinebench R15 which uses all the processor threads.

3020e 196
Ryzen 9 6900HX 2231
+1038%

Cinebench 15 64-bit single-core

Cinebench R15 (standing for Release 15) is a benchmark made by Maxon, authors of Cinema 4D. It was superseded by later versions of Cinebench, which use more modern variants of Cinema 4D engine. The Single Core version (sometimes called Single-Thread) only uses a single processor thread to render a room full of reflective spheres and light sources.

3020e 92
Ryzen 9 6900HX 249
+171%

TrueCrypt AES

TrueCrypt is a discontinued piece of software that was widely used for on-the-fly-encryption of disk partitions, now superseded by VeraCrypt. It contains several embedded performance tests, one of them being TrueCrypt AES, which measures data encryption speed using AES algorithm. Result is encryption speed in gigabytes per second.

3020e 1.1
Ryzen 9 6900HX 11.9
+982%

x264 encoding pass 2

x264 Pass 2 is a slower variant of x264 video compression that produces a variable bit rate output file, which results in better quality since the higher bit rate is used when it is needed more. Benchmark result is still measured in frames per second.  

3020e 13
Ryzen 9 6900HX 114
+794%

x264 encoding pass 1

x264 version 4.0 is a video encoding benchmark uses MPEG 4 x264 compression method to compress a sample HD (720p) video. Pass 1 is a faster variant that produces a constant bit rate output file. Its result is measured in frames per second, which means how many frames of the source video file were encoded per second.  

3020e 65
Ryzen 9 6900HX 256
+291%

WinRAR 4.0

WinRAR 4.0 is an outdated version of a popular file archiver. It contains an internal speed test, using 'Best' setting of RAR compression on large chunks of randomly generated data. Its results are measured in kilobytes per second.

3020e 1232
Ryzen 9 6900HX 6875
+458%

Geekbench 5.5 Multi-Core

3020e 1188
Ryzen 9 6900HX 9647
+712%

Blender(-)

3020e 2964
+1183%
Ryzen 9 6900HX 231

Geekbench 5.5 Single-Core

3020e 638
Ryzen 9 6900HX 1589
+149%

7-Zip Single

3020e 2597
Ryzen 9 6900HX 5817
+124%

7-Zip

3020e 4963
Ryzen 9 6900HX 61333
+1136%

WebXPRT 3

3020e 105
Ryzen 9 6900HX 286
+172%

Gaming performance

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 1.59 16.18
Integrated graphics card 2.98 15.98
Physical cores 2 8
Threads 2 16
Chip lithography 14 nm 6 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 6 Watt 45 Watt

3020e has 650% lower power consumption.

Ryzen 9 6900HX, on the other hand, has a 917.6% higher aggregate performance score, 436.2% faster integrated GPU, 300% more physical cores and 700% more threads, and a 133.3% more advanced lithography process.

The Ryzen 9 6900HX is our recommended choice as it beats the 3020e in performance tests.


Should you still have questions on choice between 3020e and Ryzen 9 6900HX, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


AMD 3020e
3020e
AMD Ryzen 9 6900HX
Ryzen 9 6900HX

Similar processor comparisons

We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


3.3 811 votes

Rate 3020e on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
4.1 455 votes

Rate Ryzen 9 6900HX on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about 3020e or Ryzen 9 6900HX, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.