Ryzen 7 5700G vs 3020e

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Aggregate performance score

3020e
2020
2 cores / 2 threads, 6 Watt
1.58
Ryzen 7 5700G
2021
8 cores / 16 threads, 65 Watt
15.88
+905%

Ryzen 7 5700G outperforms 3020e by a whopping 905% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

Comparing 3020e and Ryzen 7 5700G processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in performance ranking2015402
Place by popularitynot in top-10046
Cost-effectiveness evaluationno data11.53
Market segmentLaptopDesktop processor
SeriesAMD Raven Ridge (Ryzen 2000 APU)AMD Ryzen 7
Architecture codenameDali (Zen)Cezanne (Zen 3)
Release date4 August 2020 (3 years ago)13 April 2021 (3 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)no data$359
Current priceno data$1050 (2.9x MSRP)

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance per price, higher is better.

no data

Detailed specifications

3020e and Ryzen 7 5700G basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores2 (Dual-core)8 (Octa-Core)
Threads216
Base clock speed1.2 GHz3.8 GHz
Boost clock speed2.6 GHz4.6 GHz
L1 cache192 KB64K (per core)
L2 cache1 MB512K (per core)
L3 cache4 MB16 MB
Chip lithography14 nm7 nm
Die sizeno dataAM4 (1331) mm2
Maximum core temperature105 °C95 °C
Maximum case temperature (TCase)no data95 °C
64 bit support++
Windows 11 compatibility++
Unlocked multiplierNoYes

Compatibility

Information on 3020e and Ryzen 7 5700G compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configurationno data1
SocketFT5AM4
Power consumption (TDP)6 Watt65 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by 3020e and Ryzen 7 5700G. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

Instruction set extensionsDDR4-2400, PCIe 3, MMX, SSE, SSE2, SSE3, SSSE3, SSE4A, SSE4.1, SSE4.2, AVX, AVX2, BMI2, ABM, FMA, ADX, SMEP, SMAP, CPB, AES-NI, RDRAND, RDSEED, SHA, SMEDDR4-3200 RAM, PCIe 3, MMX, SSE, SSE2, SSE3, SSSE3, SSE4A, SSE4.1, SSE4.2, AVX, AVX2, BMI2, ABM, FMA, ADX, SMEP, SMAP, SMT, CPB, AES-NI, RDRAND, RDSEED, SHA, SME
AES-NI++
FMA++
AVX++

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by 3020e and Ryzen 7 5700G are enumerated here.

AMD-Vno data+

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by 3020e and Ryzen 7 5700G. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesDDR4DDR4
Maximum memory bandwidthno data51.196 GB/s

Graphics specifications

General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.

Integrated graphics card
Compare
AMD Radeon RX Vega 3AMD Radeon RX Vega 8 (Ryzen 4000/5000)

Peripherals

Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by 3020e and Ryzen 7 5700G.

PCIe versionno data3.0

Synthetic benchmark performance

Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark performance rating. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

3020e 1.58
Ryzen 7 5700G 15.88
+905%

Ryzen 7 5700G outperforms 3020e by 905% based on our aggregate benchmark results.


Passmark

Passmark CPU Mark is a widespread benchmark, consisting of 8 different types of workload, including integer and floating point math, extended instructions, compression, encryption and physics calculation. There is also one separate single-threaded scenario measuring single-core performance.

Benchmark coverage: 68%

3020e 2445
Ryzen 7 5700G 24563
+905%

Ryzen 7 5700G outperforms 3020e by 905% in Passmark.

GeekBench 5 Single-Core

GeekBench 5 Single-Core is a cross-platform application developed in the form of CPU tests that independently recreate certain real-world tasks with which to accurately measure performance. This version uses only a single CPU core.

Benchmark coverage: 42%

3020e 656
Ryzen 7 5700G 1984
+202%

Ryzen 7 5700G outperforms 3020e by 202% in GeekBench 5 Single-Core.

GeekBench 5 Multi-Core

GeekBench 5 Multi-Core is a cross-platform application developed in the form of CPU tests that independently recreate certain real-world tasks with which to accurately measure performance. This version uses all available CPU cores.

Benchmark coverage: 42%

3020e 1089
Ryzen 7 5700G 8738
+702%

Ryzen 7 5700G outperforms 3020e by 702% in GeekBench 5 Multi-Core.

wPrime 32

wPrime 32M is a math multi-thread processor test, which calculates square roots of first 32 million integer numbers. Its result is measured in seconds, so that the less is benchmark result, the faster the processor.

Benchmark coverage: 18%

3020e 29
Ryzen 7 5700G 4.33
+570%

3020e outperforms Ryzen 7 5700G by 570% in wPrime 32.

Cinebench 15 64-bit multi-core

Cinebench Release 15 Multi Core is a variant of Cinebench R15 which uses all the processor threads.

Benchmark coverage: 15%

3020e 196
Ryzen 7 5700G 2107
+975%

Ryzen 7 5700G outperforms 3020e by 975% in Cinebench 15 64-bit multi-core.

Cinebench 15 64-bit single-core

Cinebench R15 (standing for Release 15) is a benchmark made by Maxon, authors of Cinema 4D. It was superseded by later versions of Cinebench, which use more modern variants of Cinema 4D engine. The Single Core version (sometimes called Single-Thread) only uses a single processor thread to render a room full of reflective spheres and light sources.

Benchmark coverage: 15%

3020e 92
Ryzen 7 5700G 243
+164%

Ryzen 7 5700G outperforms 3020e by 164% in Cinebench 15 64-bit single-core.

TrueCrypt AES

TrueCrypt is a discontinued piece of software that was widely used for on-the-fly-encryption of disk partitions, now superseded by VeraCrypt. It contains several embedded performance tests, one of them being TrueCrypt AES, which measures data encryption speed using AES algorithm. Result is encryption speed in gigabytes per second.

Benchmark coverage: 13%

3020e 1.1
Ryzen 7 5700G 10.5
+855%

Ryzen 7 5700G outperforms 3020e by 855% in TrueCrypt AES.

WinRAR 4.0

WinRAR 4.0 is an outdated version of a popular file archiver. It contains an internal speed test, using 'Best' setting of RAR compression on large chunks of randomly generated data. Its results are measured in kilobytes per second.

Benchmark coverage: 13%

3020e 1232
Ryzen 7 5700G 7681
+523%

Ryzen 7 5700G outperforms 3020e by 523% in WinRAR 4.0.

x264 encoding pass 2

x264 Pass 2 is a slower variant of x264 video compression that produces a variable bit rate output file, which results in better quality since the higher bit rate is used when it is needed more. Benchmark result is still measured in frames per second.  

Benchmark coverage: 13%

3020e 13
Ryzen 7 5700G 123
+864%

Ryzen 7 5700G outperforms 3020e by 864% in x264 encoding pass 2.

x264 encoding pass 1

x264 version 4.0 is a video encoding benchmark uses MPEG 4 x264 compression method to compress a sample HD (720p) video. Pass 1 is a faster variant that produces a constant bit rate output file. Its result is measured in frames per second, which means how many frames of the source video file were encoded per second.  

Benchmark coverage: 13%

3020e 65
Ryzen 7 5700G 274
+319%

Ryzen 7 5700G outperforms 3020e by 319% in x264 encoding pass 1.

Gaming performance

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 1.58 15.88
Integrated graphics card 2.98 9.08
Recency 4 August 2020 13 April 2021
Physical cores 2 8
Threads 2 16
Chip lithography 14 nm 7 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 6 Watt 65 Watt

The Ryzen 7 5700G is our recommended choice as it beats the 3020e in performance tests.

Be aware that 3020e is a notebook processor while Ryzen 7 5700G is a desktop one.


Should you still have questions on choice between 3020e and Ryzen 7 5700G, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


AMD 3020e
3020e
AMD Ryzen 7 5700G
Ryzen 7 5700G

Similar processor comparisons

We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


3.3 776 votes

Rate 3020e on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
4.3 3273 votes

Rate Ryzen 7 5700G on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about 3020e or Ryzen 7 5700G, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.