Ryzen 5 7640U vs 3020e

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Aggregate performance score

3020e
2020
2 cores / 2 threads, 6 Watt
1.58
Ryzen 5 7640U
2023
6 cores / 12 threads, 15 Watt
13.87
+778%

Ryzen 5 7640U outperforms 3020e by a whopping 778% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

Comparing 3020e and Ryzen 5 7640U processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in performance ranking2015497
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Market segmentLaptopLaptop
SeriesAMD Raven Ridge (Ryzen 2000 APU)no data
Architecture codenameDali (Zen)Phoenix-U (Zen 4)
Release date4 August 2020 (3 years ago)3 May 2023 (1 year ago)

Detailed specifications

3020e and Ryzen 5 7640U basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores2 (Dual-core)6 (Hexa-Core)
Threads212
Base clock speed1.2 GHz3.5 GHz
Boost clock speed2.6 GHz4.9 GHz
L1 cache192 KB64 KB (per core)
L2 cache1 MB1 MB (per core)
L3 cache4 MB16 MB (shared)
Chip lithography14 nm4 nm
Die sizeno data178 mm2
Maximum core temperature105 °C100 °C
Number of transistorsno data25,000 million
64 bit support++
Windows 11 compatibility++
Unlocked multiplierNoNo

Compatibility

Information on 3020e and Ryzen 5 7640U compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configurationno data1
SocketFT5FP8
Power consumption (TDP)6 Watt15 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by 3020e and Ryzen 5 7640U. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

Instruction set extensionsDDR4-2400, PCIe 3, MMX, SSE, SSE2, SSE3, SSSE3, SSE4A, SSE4.1, SSE4.2, AVX, AVX2, BMI2, ABM, FMA, ADX, SMEP, SMAP, CPB, AES-NI, RDRAND, RDSEED, SHA, SMEDDR5-5600/LPDDR5x-7500 RAM, PCIe 4, Ryzen AI, AES, AVX, AVX2, AVX512, FMA3, MMX (+), SHA, SSE, SSE2, SSE3, SSE4.1, SSE4.2, SSE4A, SSSE3
AES-NI++
FMA+no data
AVX++

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by 3020e and Ryzen 5 7640U are enumerated here.

AMD-Vno data+

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by 3020e and Ryzen 5 7640U. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesDDR4DDR5

Graphics specifications

General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.

Integrated graphics card
Compare
AMD Radeon RX Vega 3AMD Radeon 760M

Peripherals

Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by 3020e and Ryzen 5 7640U.

PCIe versionno data4.0
PCI Express lanesno data20

Synthetic benchmark performance

Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark performance rating. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

3020e 1.58
Ryzen 5 7640U 13.87
+778%

Ryzen 5 7640U outperforms 3020e by 778% based on our aggregate benchmark results.


Passmark

Passmark CPU Mark is a widespread benchmark, consisting of 8 different types of workload, including integer and floating point math, extended instructions, compression, encryption and physics calculation. There is also one separate single-threaded scenario measuring single-core performance.

Benchmark coverage: 68%

3020e 2445
Ryzen 5 7640U 21453
+777%

Ryzen 5 7640U outperforms 3020e by 777% in Passmark.

GeekBench 5 Single-Core

GeekBench 5 Single-Core is a cross-platform application developed in the form of CPU tests that independently recreate certain real-world tasks with which to accurately measure performance. This version uses only a single CPU core.

Benchmark coverage: 42%

3020e 656
Ryzen 5 7640U 2176
+232%

Ryzen 5 7640U outperforms 3020e by 232% in GeekBench 5 Single-Core.

GeekBench 5 Multi-Core

GeekBench 5 Multi-Core is a cross-platform application developed in the form of CPU tests that independently recreate certain real-world tasks with which to accurately measure performance. This version uses all available CPU cores.

Benchmark coverage: 42%

3020e 1089
Ryzen 5 7640U 8813
+709%

Ryzen 5 7640U outperforms 3020e by 709% in GeekBench 5 Multi-Core.

Gaming performance

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 1.58 13.87
Integrated graphics card 2.98 15.30
Recency 4 August 2020 3 May 2023
Physical cores 2 6
Threads 2 12
Chip lithography 14 nm 4 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 6 Watt 15 Watt

The Ryzen 5 7640U is our recommended choice as it beats the 3020e in performance tests.


Should you still have questions on choice between 3020e and Ryzen 5 7640U, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


AMD 3020e
3020e
AMD Ryzen 5 7640U
Ryzen 5 7640U

Similar processor comparisons

We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


3.3 776 votes

Rate 3020e on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
4.5 31 vote

Rate Ryzen 5 7640U on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about 3020e or Ryzen 5 7640U, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.