EPYC 9654 vs 3020e

#ad
Buy on Amazon
VS

Aggregated performance score

3020e
2020
2 cores / 2 threads
1.56
EPYC 9654
2022
96 cores / 192 threads
77.72
+4882%

EPYC 9654 outperforms 3020e by 4882% based on our aggregated benchmark results.

Primary Details

Comparing 3020e and EPYC 9654 processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in performance ranking19834
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Cost-Effectiveness Evaluationno data10.18
Market segmentLaptopServer
SeriesAMD Raven Ridge (Ryzen 2000 APU)AMD EPYC
Architecture codenameDali (Zen)Genoa
Release date4 August 2020 (3 years ago)10 November 2022 (1 year ago)
Launch price (MSRP)no data$11,805
Current priceno data$4544 (0.4x MSRP)

Cost-Effectiveness Evaluation

Performance per price, higher is better.

no data

Detailed Specifications

3020e and EPYC 9654 basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores2 (Dual-core)96
Threads2192
Base clock speed1.2 GHz2.4 GHz
Boost clock speed2.6 GHz2.4 GHz
L1 cache192 KB6 MB
L2 cache1 MB96 MB
L3 cache4 MB384 MB (shared)
Chip lithography14 nm5 nm, 6 nm
Die sizeno data12x 72 mm2
Maximum core temperature105 °Cno data
Number of transistorsno data78,840 million
64 bit support++
Windows 11 compatibility+no data
Unlocked multiplierNoNo

Compatibility

Information on 3020e and EPYC 9654 compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configurationno data2
SocketFT5SP5
Power consumption (TDP)6 Watt360 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by 3020e and EPYC 9654. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

Instruction set extensionsDDR4-2400, PCIe 3, MMX, SSE, SSE2, SSE3, SSSE3, SSE4A, SSE4.1, SSE4.2, AVX, AVX2, BMI2, ABM, FMA, ADX, SMEP, SMAP, CPB, AES-NI, RDRAND, RDSEED, SHA, SMEno data
AES-NI++
FMA+no data
AVX++

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by 3020e and EPYC 9654 are enumerated here.

AMD-Vno data+

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by 3020e and EPYC 9654. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesDDR4DDR5-4800
Maximum memory sizeno data6 TiB
Maximum memory bandwidthno data460.8 GB/s

Graphics specifications

General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.

Integrated graphics cardAMD Radeon RX Vega 3no data

Peripherals

Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by 3020e and EPYC 9654.

PCIe versionno data5.0
PCI Express lanesno data128

Synthetic benchmark performance

Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark performance rating. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

3020e 1.56
EPYC 9654 77.72
+4882%

EPYC 9654 outperforms 3020e by 4882% based on our aggregated benchmark results.


Passmark

Passmark CPU Mark is a widespread benchmark, consisting of 8 different types of workload, including integer and floating point math, extended instructions, compression, encryption and physics calculation. There is also one separate single-threaded scenario measuring single-core performance.

Benchmark coverage: 68%

3020e 2451
EPYC 9654 122091
+4881%

EPYC 9654 outperforms 3020e by 4881% in Passmark.

GeekBench 5 Single-Core

GeekBench 5 Single-Core is a cross-platform application developed in the form of CPU tests that independently recreate certain real-world tasks with which to accurately measure performance. This version uses only a single CPU core.

Benchmark coverage: 42%

3020e 655
EPYC 9654 1829
+179%

EPYC 9654 outperforms 3020e by 179% in GeekBench 5 Single-Core.

GeekBench 5 Multi-Core

GeekBench 5 Multi-Core is a cross-platform application developed in the form of CPU tests that independently recreate certain real-world tasks with which to accurately measure performance. This version uses all available CPU cores.

Benchmark coverage: 42%

3020e 1092
EPYC 9654 18566
+1600%

EPYC 9654 outperforms 3020e by 1600% in GeekBench 5 Multi-Core.

Gaming performance

Pros & Cons Summary


Performance score 1.56 77.72
Recency 4 August 2020 10 November 2022
Physical cores 2 96
Threads 2 192
Chip lithography 14 nm 5 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 6 Watt 360 Watt

The EPYC 9654 is our recommended choice as it beats the 3020e in performance tests.

Be aware that 3020e is a notebook processor while EPYC 9654 is a server/workstation one.


Should you still have questions on choice between 3020e and EPYC 9654, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for Your Favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


AMD 3020e
3020e
AMD EPYC 9654
EPYC 9654

Similar processor comparisons

We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.

Community Ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


3.3 768 votes

Rate 3020e on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.8 979 votes

Rate EPYC 9654 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & Сomments

Here you can ask a question about 3020e or EPYC 9654, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.