AMD EPYC 7763 vs 3020e

#ad
Buy
VS

Combined performance score

3020e
1.59

EPYC 7763 outperforms 3020e by 3395% in our combined benchmark results.

General info

Comparing 3020e and EPYC 7763 processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in performance ranking196520
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Value for moneyno data1.19
Market segmentLaptopServer
SeriesAMD Raven Ridge (Ryzen 2000 APU)AMD EPYC
Architecture codenameDali (Zen)Milan (2021)
Release date4 August 2020 (3 years old)15 March 2021 (3 years old)
Launch price (MSRP)no data$7,890
Current priceno data$13541 (1.7x MSRP)
Value for money

Performance per price, higher is better.

no data

Technical specs

3020e and EPYC 7763 basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores2 (Dual-core)64 (Tetrahexaconta-Core)
Threads2128
Base clock speed1.2 GHz2.45 GHz
Boost clock speed2.6 GHz3.5 GHz
L1 cache192 KB64 KB (per core)
L2 cache1 MB512 KB (per core)
L3 cache4 MB256 MB (shared)
Chip lithography14 nm7 nm+
Die sizeno data8x 81 mm2
Maximum core temperature105 °Cno data
Number of transistorsno data33,200 million
64 bit support++
Windows 11 compatibility++
Unlocked multiplierNoYes

Compatibility

Information on 3020e and EPYC 7763 compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configurationno data2
SocketFT5SP3
Power consumption (TDP)6 Watt280 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by 3020e and EPYC 7763. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

Instruction set extensionsDDR4-2400, PCIe 3, MMX, SSE, SSE2, SSE3, SSSE3, SSE4A, SSE4.1, SSE4.2, AVX, AVX2, BMI2, ABM, FMA, ADX, SMEP, SMAP, CPB, AES-NI, RDRAND, RDSEED, SHA, SMEno data
AES-NI++
FMA+no data
AVX++

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by 3020e and EPYC 7763 are enumerated here.

AMD-Vno data+

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by 3020e and EPYC 7763. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesDDR4DDR4-3200
Maximum memory sizeno data4 TiB
Maximum memory bandwidthno data204.795 GB/s

Graphics specifications

General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.

Integrated graphics cardAMD Radeon RX Vega 3N/A

Peripherals

Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by 3020e and EPYC 7763.

PCIe versionno data4.0
PCI Express lanesno data128

Synthetic benchmark performance

Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark performance rating. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

3020e 1.59
EPYC 7763 55.57
+3395%

EPYC 7763 outperforms 3020e by 3395% in our combined benchmark results.


Passmark

Passmark CPU Mark is a widespread benchmark, consisting of 8 different types of workload, including integer and floating point math, extended instructions, compression, encryption and physics calculation. There is also one separate single-threaded scenario measuring single-core performance.

Benchmark coverage: 68%

3020e 2449
EPYC 7763 85354
+3385%

EPYC 7763 outperforms 3020e by 3385% in Passmark.

GeekBench 5 Single-Core

GeekBench 5 Single-Core is a cross-platform application developed in the form of CPU tests that independently recreate certain real-world tasks with which to accurately measure performance. This version uses only a single CPU core.

Benchmark coverage: 42%

3020e 655
EPYC 7763 1379
+111%

EPYC 7763 outperforms 3020e by 111% in GeekBench 5 Single-Core.

GeekBench 5 Multi-Core

GeekBench 5 Multi-Core is a cross-platform application developed in the form of CPU tests that independently recreate certain real-world tasks with which to accurately measure performance. This version uses all available CPU cores.

Benchmark coverage: 42%

3020e 1091
EPYC 7763 11241
+930%

EPYC 7763 outperforms 3020e by 930% in GeekBench 5 Multi-Core.

Gaming performance

Advantages and disadvantages


Performance score 1.59 55.57
Recency 4 August 2020 15 March 2021
Physical cores 2 64
Threads 2 128
Chip lithography 14 nm 7 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 6 Watt 280 Watt

The EPYC 7763 is our recommended choice as it beats the 3020e in performance tests.

Be aware that 3020e is a notebook processor while EPYC 7763 is a server/workstation one.


Should you still have questions on choice between 3020e and EPYC 7763, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

User ratings

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


AMD 3020e
3020e
AMD EPYC 7763
EPYC 7763

Similar processor comparisons

We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.

User ratings: view and submit

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


3.3 757 votes

Rate AMD 3020e on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.2 1195 votes

Rate AMD EPYC 7763 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions and comments

Here you can ask a question about 3020e or EPYC 7763, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.