Ultra 7 258V vs 3020e

VS

Aggregate performance score

3020e
2020
2 cores / 2 threads, 6 Watt
1.56
Core Ultra 7 258V
2024
8 cores / 8 threads, 17 Watt
12.52
+703%

Core Ultra 7 258V outperforms 3020e by a whopping 703% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

Comparing 3020e and Core Ultra 7 258V processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in the ranking2121621
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Market segmentLaptopLaptop
SeriesAMD Raven Ridge (Ryzen 2000 APU)no data
Power efficiency24.1568.40
Architecture codenameDali (Zen) (2020)Lunar Lake (2024)
Release date4 August 2020 (4 years ago)24 September 2024 (less than a year ago)

Detailed specifications

3020e and Core Ultra 7 258V basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores2 (Dual-core)8 (Octa-Core)
Threads28
Base clock speed1.2 GHz2.2 GHz
Boost clock speed2.6 GHz4.8 GHz
Bus rateno data37 MHz
L1 cache192 KB192 KB (per core)
L2 cache1 MB2.5 MB (per core)
L3 cache4 MB12 MB (shared)
Chip lithography14 nm3 nm
Maximum core temperature105 °C100 °C
64 bit support++
Windows 11 compatibility+no data

Compatibility

Information on 3020e and Core Ultra 7 258V compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configurationno data1
SocketFT5Intel BGA 2833
Power consumption (TDP)6 Watt17 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by 3020e and Core Ultra 7 258V. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

Instruction set extensionsMMX, SSE, SSE2, SSE3, SSSE3, SSE4A, SSE4.1, SSE4.2, AVX, AVX2, BMI2, ABM, FMA, ADX, SMEP, SMAP, CPB, AES-NI, RDRAND, RDSEED, SHA, SMEno data
AES-NI++
FMA+-
AVX++
Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST)no data+
TSX-+

Security technologies

3020e and Core Ultra 7 258V technologies aimed at improving security, for example, by protecting against hacks.

TXTno data+

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by 3020e and Core Ultra 7 258V are enumerated here.

VT-dno data+
VT-xno data+

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by 3020e and Core Ultra 7 258V. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesDDR4DDR5

Graphics specifications

General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.

Integrated graphics cardAMD Radeon RX Vega 3Arc 140V

Peripherals

Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by 3020e and Core Ultra 7 258V.

PCIe versionno data5.0
PCI Express lanesno data4

Synthetic benchmark performance

Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark performance rating. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

3020e 1.56
Ultra 7 258V 12.52
+703%

Passmark

Passmark CPU Mark is a widespread benchmark, consisting of 8 different types of workload, including integer and floating point math, extended instructions, compression, encryption and physics calculation. There is also one separate single-threaded scenario measuring single-core performance.

3020e 2438
Ultra 7 258V 19509
+700%

Cinebench 15 64-bit multi-core

Cinebench Release 15 Multi Core is a variant of Cinebench R15 which uses all the processor threads.

3020e 196
Ultra 7 258V 1593
+713%

Cinebench 15 64-bit single-core

Cinebench R15 (standing for Release 15) is a benchmark made by Maxon, authors of Cinema 4D. It was superseded by later versions of Cinebench, which use more modern variants of Cinema 4D engine. The Single Core version (sometimes called Single-Thread) only uses a single processor thread to render a room full of reflective spheres and light sources.

3020e 92
Ultra 7 258V 270
+193%

TrueCrypt AES

TrueCrypt is a discontinued piece of software that was widely used for on-the-fly-encryption of disk partitions, now superseded by VeraCrypt. It contains several embedded performance tests, one of them being TrueCrypt AES, which measures data encryption speed using AES algorithm. Result is encryption speed in gigabytes per second.

3020e 1.1
Ultra 7 258V 7.6
+591%

WinRAR 4.0

WinRAR 4.0 is an outdated version of a popular file archiver. It contains an internal speed test, using 'Best' setting of RAR compression on large chunks of randomly generated data. Its results are measured in kilobytes per second.

3020e 1232
Ultra 7 258V 8536
+593%

Geekbench 5.5 Multi-Core

3020e 1188
Ultra 7 258V 9540
+703%

Blender(-)

3020e 2964
+694%
Ultra 7 258V 374

Geekbench 5.5 Single-Core

3020e 638
Ultra 7 258V 1973
+209%

7-Zip Single

3020e 2597
Ultra 7 258V 5670
+118%

7-Zip

3020e 4963
Ultra 7 258V 34255
+590%

WebXPRT 3

3020e 105
Ultra 7 258V 270
+157%

Gaming performance

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 1.56 12.52
Recency 4 August 2020 24 September 2024
Physical cores 2 8
Threads 2 8
Chip lithography 14 nm 3 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 6 Watt 17 Watt

3020e has 183.3% lower power consumption.

Ultra 7 258V, on the other hand, has a 702.6% higher aggregate performance score, an age advantage of 4 years, 300% more physical cores and 300% more threads, and a 366.7% more advanced lithography process.

The Core Ultra 7 258V is our recommended choice as it beats the 3020e in performance tests.


Should you still have questions on choice between 3020e and Core Ultra 7 258V, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


AMD 3020e
3020e
Intel Core Ultra 7 258V
Core Ultra 7 258V

Similar processor comparisons

We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


3.3 812 votes

Rate 3020e on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.5 8 votes

Rate Core Ultra 7 258V on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about 3020e or Core Ultra 7 258V, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.