Core 2 Duo L7400 vs 3020e

VS

Aggregate performance score

3020e
2020
2 cores / 2 threads, 6 Watt
1.53
+378%

3020e outperforms Core 2 Duo L7400 by a whopping 378% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

Comparing 3020e and Core 2 Duo L7400 processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in the ranking21373094
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Market segmentLaptopLaptop
SeriesAMD Raven Ridge (Ryzen 2000 APU)no data
Power efficiency24.131.78
Architecture codenameDali (Zen) (2020)no data
Release date4 August 2020 (4 years ago)1 July 2006 (18 years ago)

Detailed specifications

3020e and Core 2 Duo L7400 basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores2 (Dual-core)2 (Dual-core)
Threads2no data
Base clock speed1.2 GHz1.5 GHz
Boost clock speed2.6 GHzno data
Bus rateno data667 MHz
L1 cache192 KBno data
L2 cache1 MBno data
L3 cache4 MB4 MB L2 Cache
Chip lithography14 nm65 nm
Maximum core temperature105 °C100 °C
64 bit support++
Windows 11 compatibility+-
VID voltage rangeno data0.9V-1.1V

Compatibility

Information on 3020e and Core 2 Duo L7400 compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

SocketFT5PBGA479
Power consumption (TDP)6 Watt17 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by 3020e and Core 2 Duo L7400. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

Instruction set extensionsMMX, SSE, SSE2, SSE3, SSSE3, SSE4A, SSE4.1, SSE4.2, AVX, AVX2, BMI2, ABM, FMA, ADX, SMEP, SMAP, CPB, AES-NI, RDRAND, RDSEED, SHA, SMEno data
AES-NI+-
FMA+-
AVX+-
Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST)no data+
Turbo Boost Technologyno data-
Hyper-Threading Technologyno data-
Idle Statesno data-
Demand Based Switchingno data-
FSB parityno data-

Security technologies

3020e and Core 2 Duo L7400 technologies aimed at improving security, for example, by protecting against hacks.

TXTno data-
EDBno data+

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by 3020e and Core 2 Duo L7400 are enumerated here.

VT-xno data+

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by 3020e and Core 2 Duo L7400. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesDDR4no data

Graphics specifications

General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.

Integrated graphics cardAMD Radeon RX Vega 3 ( - 1000 MHz)no data

Synthetic benchmark performance

Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark performance rating. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

3020e 1.53
+378%
Core 2 Duo L7400 0.32

Passmark

Passmark CPU Mark is a widespread benchmark, consisting of 8 different types of workload, including integer and floating point math, extended instructions, compression, encryption and physics calculation. There is also one separate single-threaded scenario measuring single-core performance.

3020e 2433
+372%
Core 2 Duo L7400 516

Gaming performance

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 1.53 0.32
Recency 4 August 2020 1 July 2006
Chip lithography 14 nm 65 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 6 Watt 17 Watt

3020e has a 378.1% higher aggregate performance score, an age advantage of 14 years, a 364.3% more advanced lithography process, and 183.3% lower power consumption.

The 3020e is our recommended choice as it beats the Core 2 Duo L7400 in performance tests.


Should you still have questions on choice between 3020e and Core 2 Duo L7400, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


AMD 3020e
3020e
Intel Core 2 Duo L7400
Core 2 Duo L7400

Similar processor comparisons

We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


3.3 815 votes

Rate 3020e on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
5 2 votes

Rate Core 2 Duo L7400 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about 3020e or Core 2 Duo L7400, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.