Xeon 6781P vs 3015e

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Aggregate performance score

3015e
2020
2 cores / 4 threads, 6 Watt
1.49
Xeon 6781P
2025
80 cores / 160 threads, 350 Watt
66.95
+4393%

Xeon 6781P outperforms 3015e by a whopping 4393% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

Comparing processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in the ranking232821
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Market segmentLaptopServer
SeriesAMD Raven Ridge (Ryzen 2000 APU)no data
Power efficiency10.528.11
DesignerAMDIntel
Architecture codenamePollock (Zen) (2020)no data
Release date4 August 2020 (5 years ago)1 January 2025 (less than a year ago)

Detailed specifications

3015e and Xeon 6781P basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores2 (Dual-core)80
Threads4160
Base clock speed1.2 GHz2 GHz
Boost clock speed2.3 GHz3.8 GHz
L1 cache192 KBno data
L2 cache1 MBno data
L3 cache4 MB336 MB
Chip lithography14 nmIntel 3 nm
Maximum core temperature105 °C81 °C
64 bit support+-
Windows 11 compatibility-no data

Compatibility

Information on 3015e and Xeon 6781P compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

SocketFT5FCLGA4710
Power consumption (TDP)6 Watt350 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by 3015e and Xeon 6781P. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

Instruction set extensionsMMX, SSE, SSE2, SSE3, SSSE3, SSE4A, SSE4.1, SSE4.2, AVX, AVX2, BMI2, ABM, FMA, ADX, SMEP, SMAP, SMT, CPB, AES-NI, RDRAND, RDSEED, SHA, SMEIntel® AMX, Intel® SSE4.2, Intel® AVX, Intel® AVX2, Intel® AVX-512
AES-NI++
FMA+-
AVX+-
Speed Shiftno data+
Turbo Boost Technologyno data2.0
Hyper-Threading Technologyno data+
TSX-+
Deep Learning Boost-+

Security technologies

3015e and Xeon 6781P technologies aimed at improving security, for example, by protecting against hacks.

TXTno data+
EDBno data+
SGXno data+
OS Guardno data+

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by 3015e and Xeon 6781P are enumerated here.

VT-dno data+
VT-xno data+
EPTno data+

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by 3015e and Xeon 6781P. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesDDR4DDR5(6400MT/s), MRDIMM(8800MT/s)
Maximum memory sizeno data4 TB
Max memory channelsno data8
ECC memory support-+

Graphics specifications

General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.

Integrated graphics cardAMD Radeon RX Vega 3 ( - 600 MHz)no data

Peripherals

Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by 3015e and Xeon 6781P.

PCIe versionno data5.0
PCI Express lanesno data136

Synthetic benchmarks

Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark performance rating.

3015e 1.49
Xeon 6781P 66.95
+4393%

Passmark

Passmark CPU Mark is a widespread benchmark, consisting of 8 different types of workload, including integer and floating point math, extended instructions, compression, encryption and physics calculation. There is also one separate single-threaded scenario measuring single-core performance. Other than that, Passmark measures multi-core performance.

3015e 2621
Samples: 61
Xeon 6781P 117946
+4400%
Samples: 2

Gaming performance

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 1.49 66.95
Recency 4 August 2020 1 January 2025
Physical cores 2 80
Threads 4 160
Power consumption (TDP) 6 Watt 350 Watt

3015e has 5733.3% lower power consumption.

Xeon 6781P, on the other hand, has a 4393.3% higher aggregate performance score, an age advantage of 4 years, and 3900% more physical cores and 3900% more threads.

The Intel Xeon 6781P is our recommended choice as it beats the AMD 3015e in performance tests.

Be aware that 3015e is a notebook processor while Xeon 6781P is a server/workstation one.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


AMD 3015e
3015e
Intel Xeon 6781P
Xeon 6781P

Other comparisons

We've compiled a selection of CPU comparisons, ranging from closely matched processors to other comparisons that may be of interest.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


2.6 36 votes

Rate 3015e on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

No user ratings yet.

Rate Xeon 6781P on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Comments

Here you can give us your opinion about processors 3015e and Xeon 6781P, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report bugs or inaccuracies on the site.