Ryzen 5 PRO 4650G vs 3015e

VS

Aggregate performance score

3015e
2020
2 cores / 4 threads, 6 Watt
1.69
Ryzen 5 PRO 4650G
2020
6 cores / 12 threads, 65 Watt
10.18
+502%

Ryzen 5 PRO 4650G outperforms 3015e by a whopping 502% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

Comparing 3015e and Ryzen 5 PRO 4650G processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in the ranking2065767
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Market segmentLaptopDesktop processor
SeriesAMD Raven Ridge (Ryzen 2000 APU)AMD Ryzen 5
Power efficiency26.6414.81
Architecture codenamePollock (Zen) (2020)Renoir (2020−2023)
Release date4 August 2020 (4 years ago)21 July 2020 (4 years ago)

Detailed specifications

3015e and Ryzen 5 PRO 4650G basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores2 (Dual-core)6 (Hexa-Core)
Threads412
Base clock speed1.2 GHz3.7 GHz
Boost clock speed2.3 GHz4.2 GHz
Multiplierno data37
L1 cache192 KB64 KB (per core)
L2 cache1 MB512 KB (per core)
L3 cache4 MB8 MB (shared)
Chip lithography14 nm7 nm
Die sizeno data156 mm2
Maximum core temperature105 °Cno data
Maximum case temperature (TCase)no data95 °C
Number of transistorsno data9,800 million
64 bit support++
Windows 11 compatibility-+

Compatibility

Information on 3015e and Ryzen 5 PRO 4650G compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configurationno data1
SocketFT5AM4
Power consumption (TDP)6 Watt65 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by 3015e and Ryzen 5 PRO 4650G. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

Instruction set extensionsMMX, SSE, SSE2, SSE3, SSSE3, SSE4A, SSE4.1, SSE4.2, AVX, AVX2, BMI2, ABM, FMA, ADX, SMEP, SMAP, SMT, CPB, AES-NI, RDRAND, RDSEED, SHA, SMEno data
AES-NI++
FMA+-
AVX++

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by 3015e and Ryzen 5 PRO 4650G are enumerated here.

AMD-V-+

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by 3015e and Ryzen 5 PRO 4650G. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesDDR4DDR4-3200
Maximum memory sizeno data128 GB
Maximum memory bandwidthno data51.196 GB/s

Graphics specifications

General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.

Integrated graphics card
Compare
AMD Radeon RX Vega 3 ( - 600 MHz)AMD Radeon Vega 7

Peripherals

Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by 3015e and Ryzen 5 PRO 4650G.

PCIe versionno data3.0

Synthetic benchmark performance

Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark performance rating. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

3015e 1.69
Ryzen 5 PRO 4650G 10.18
+502%

Passmark

Passmark CPU Mark is a widespread benchmark, consisting of 8 different types of workload, including integer and floating point math, extended instructions, compression, encryption and physics calculation. There is also one separate single-threaded scenario measuring single-core performance.

3015e 2677
Ryzen 5 PRO 4650G 16171
+504%

GeekBench 5 Single-Core

GeekBench 5 Single-Core is a cross-platform application developed in the form of CPU tests that independently recreate certain real-world tasks with which to accurately measure performance. This version uses only a single CPU core.

3015e 535
Ryzen 5 PRO 4650G 1565
+193%

GeekBench 5 Multi-Core

GeekBench 5 Multi-Core is a cross-platform application developed in the form of CPU tests that independently recreate certain real-world tasks with which to accurately measure performance. This version uses all available CPU cores.

3015e 969
Ryzen 5 PRO 4650G 6119
+531%

Gaming performance

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 1.69 10.18
Integrated graphics card 2.98 7.47
Physical cores 2 6
Threads 4 12
Chip lithography 14 nm 7 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 6 Watt 65 Watt

3015e has 983.3% lower power consumption.

Ryzen 5 PRO 4650G, on the other hand, has a 502.4% higher aggregate performance score, 150.7% faster integrated GPU, 200% more physical cores and 200% more threads, and a 100% more advanced lithography process.

The Ryzen 5 PRO 4650G is our recommended choice as it beats the 3015e in performance tests.

Be aware that 3015e is a notebook processor while Ryzen 5 PRO 4650G is a desktop one.


Should you still have questions on choice between 3015e and Ryzen 5 PRO 4650G, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


AMD 3015e
3015e
AMD Ryzen 5 PRO 4650G
Ryzen 5 PRO 4650G

Similar processor comparisons

We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


2.6 30 votes

Rate 3015e on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
4.3 1626 votes

Rate Ryzen 5 PRO 4650G on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about 3015e or Ryzen 5 PRO 4650G, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.