Ryzen 5 7520U vs 3015e

VS

Aggregate performance score

3015e
2020
2 cores / 4 threads, 6 Watt
1.74
Ryzen 5 7520U
2022
4 cores / 8 threads, 15 Watt
5.90
+239%

Ryzen 5 7520U outperforms 3015e by a whopping 239% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

Comparing 3015e and Ryzen 5 7520U processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in the ranking20391116
Place by popularitynot in top-10027
Market segmentLaptopLaptop
SeriesAMD Raven Ridge (Ryzen 2000 APU)Mendocino (Zen 2, Ryzen 7020)
Power efficiency26.9336.53
Architecture codenamePollock (Zen) (2020)Mendocino-U (Zen 2) (2022)
Release date4 August 2020 (4 years ago)20 September 2022 (2 years ago)

Detailed specifications

3015e and Ryzen 5 7520U basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores2 (Dual-core)4 (Quad-Core)
Threads48
Base clock speed1.2 GHz2.8 GHz
Boost clock speed2.3 GHz4.3 GHz
L1 cache192 KB64 KB (per core)
L2 cache1 MB512 KB (per core)
L3 cache4 MB4 MB (shared)
Chip lithography14 nm6 nm
Die sizeno data100 mm2
Maximum core temperature105 °Cno data
64 bit support++
Windows 11 compatibility-+

Compatibility

Information on 3015e and Ryzen 5 7520U compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configurationno data1
SocketFT5FP6
Power consumption (TDP)6 Watt15 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by 3015e and Ryzen 5 7520U. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

Instruction set extensionsMMX, SSE, SSE2, SSE3, SSSE3, SSE4A, SSE4.1, SSE4.2, AVX, AVX2, BMI2, ABM, FMA, ADX, SMEP, SMAP, SMT, CPB, AES-NI, RDRAND, RDSEED, SHA, SMEMMX (+), SSE, SSE2, SSE3, SSSE3, SSE4.1, SSE4.2, SSE4A, AES, AVX, AVX2, FMA3, SHA
AES-NI++
FMA+-
AVX++

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by 3015e and Ryzen 5 7520U are enumerated here.

AMD-V-+

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by 3015e and Ryzen 5 7520U. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesDDR4DDR5

Graphics specifications

General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.

Integrated graphics card
Compare
AMD Radeon RX Vega 3AMD Radeon 610M

Peripherals

Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by 3015e and Ryzen 5 7520U.

PCIe versionno data3.0
PCI Express lanesno data4

Synthetic benchmark performance

Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark performance rating. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

3015e 1.74
Ryzen 5 7520U 5.90
+239%

Passmark

Passmark CPU Mark is a widespread benchmark, consisting of 8 different types of workload, including integer and floating point math, extended instructions, compression, encryption and physics calculation. There is also one separate single-threaded scenario measuring single-core performance.

3015e 2712
Ryzen 5 7520U 9198
+239%

GeekBench 5 Single-Core

GeekBench 5 Single-Core is a cross-platform application developed in the form of CPU tests that independently recreate certain real-world tasks with which to accurately measure performance. This version uses only a single CPU core.

3015e 534
Ryzen 5 7520U 1190
+123%

GeekBench 5 Multi-Core

GeekBench 5 Multi-Core is a cross-platform application developed in the form of CPU tests that independently recreate certain real-world tasks with which to accurately measure performance. This version uses all available CPU cores.

3015e 966
Ryzen 5 7520U 3765
+290%

Geekbench 5.5 Multi-Core

3015e 860
Ryzen 5 7520U 3821
+344%

Gaming performance

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 1.74 5.90
Integrated graphics card 2.98 2.85
Recency 4 August 2020 20 September 2022
Physical cores 2 4
Threads 4 8
Chip lithography 14 nm 6 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 6 Watt 15 Watt

3015e has 4.6% faster integrated GPU, and 150% lower power consumption.

Ryzen 5 7520U, on the other hand, has a 239.1% higher aggregate performance score, an age advantage of 2 years, 100% more physical cores and 100% more threads, and a 133.3% more advanced lithography process.

The Ryzen 5 7520U is our recommended choice as it beats the 3015e in performance tests.


Should you still have questions on choice between 3015e and Ryzen 5 7520U, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


AMD 3015e
3015e
AMD Ryzen 5 7520U
Ryzen 5 7520U

Similar processor comparisons

We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


2.7 29 votes

Rate 3015e on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.6 1397 votes

Rate Ryzen 5 7520U on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about 3015e or Ryzen 5 7520U, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.