Ultra 5 250KF Plus vs 3015e

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS
#ad 
Buy on Amazon

Primary details

Comparing processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in the ranking2393not rated
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Market segmentLaptopDesktop processor
SeriesAMD Raven Ridge (Ryzen 2000 APU)no data
Power efficiency10.55no data
DesignerAMDIntel
Manufacturerno dataTSMC
Architecture codenamePollock (Zen) (2020)Arrow Lake Refresh (2026)
Release date4 August 2020 (5 years ago)11 March 2026 (recently)
Launch price (MSRP)no data$184

Detailed specifications

3015e and Core Ultra 5 250KF Plus basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores2 (Dual-core)18 (Octadeca-Core)
Threads418
Base clock speed1.2 GHz4.2 GHz
Boost clock speed2.3 GHz5.3 GHz
L1 cache192 KB192 KB (per core)
L2 cache1 MB3 MB (per core)
L3 cache4 MB30 MB (shared)
Chip lithography14 nm3 nm
Die sizeno data243 mm2
Maximum core temperature105 °Cno data
Number of transistorsno data17,800 million
64 bit support++
Windows 11 compatibility-no data
Unlocked multiplier-+

Compatibility

Information on 3015e and Core Ultra 5 250KF Plus compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configurationno data1
SocketFT51851
Power consumption (TDP)6 Watt125 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by 3015e and Core Ultra 5 250KF Plus. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

Instruction set extensionsMMX, SSE, SSE2, SSE3, SSSE3, SSE4A, SSE4.1, SSE4.2, AVX, AVX2, BMI2, ABM, FMA, ADX, SMEP, SMAP, SMT, CPB, AES-NI, RDRAND, RDSEED, SHA, SMEno data
AES-NI++
FMA+-
AVX++
vProno data+
Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST)no data+
SIPP-+

Security technologies

3015e and Core Ultra 5 250KF Plus technologies aimed at improving security, for example, by protecting against hacks.

TXTno data+

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by 3015e and Core Ultra 5 250KF Plus are enumerated here.

VT-dno data+
VT-xno data+

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by 3015e and Core Ultra 5 250KF Plus. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesDDR4DDR5

Graphics specifications

General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.

Integrated graphics cardAMD Radeon RX Vega 3 ( - 600 MHz)N/A

Peripherals

Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by 3015e and Core Ultra 5 250KF Plus.

PCIe versionno data5.0
PCI Express lanesno data24

Synthetic benchmarks

Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.



Passmark

Passmark CPU Mark is a widespread benchmark, consisting of 8 different types of workload, including integer and floating point math, extended instructions, compression, encryption and physics calculation. There is also one separate single-threaded scenario measuring single-core performance. Other than that, Passmark measures multi-core performance.

3015e 2625
Samples: 65
Ultra 5 250KF Plus 53977
+1956%
Samples: 1

Pros & cons summary


Recency 4 August 2020 11 March 2026
Physical cores 2 18
Threads 4 18
Chip lithography 14 nm 3 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 6 Watt 125 Watt

3015e has 1983.3% lower power consumption.

Ultra 5 250KF Plus, on the other hand, has an age advantage of 5 years, 800% more physical cores and 350% more threads, and a 366.7% more advanced lithography process.

We couldn't decide between AMD 3015e and Intel Core Ultra 5 250KF Plus. We've got no test results to judge.

Be aware that 3015e is a notebook processor while Core Ultra 5 250KF Plus is a desktop one.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


AMD 3015e
3015e
Intel Core Ultra 5 250KF Plus
Core Ultra 5 250KF Plus

Other comparisons

We've compiled a selection of CPU comparisons, ranging from closely matched processors to other comparisons that may be of interest.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


2.5 43 votes

Rate 3015e on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

No user ratings yet.

Rate Core Ultra 5 250KF Plus on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Comments

Here you can give us your opinion about processors 3015e and Core Ultra 5 250KF Plus, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report bugs or inaccuracies on the site.