Core 2 Quad Q9505 vs 3015Ce
Aggregate performance score
Core 2 Quad Q9505 outperforms 3015Ce by a minimal 3% based on our aggregate benchmark results.
Primary details
Comparing 3015Ce and Core 2 Quad Q9505 processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.
| Place in performance ranking | 2149 | 2136 |
| Place by popularity | not in top-100 | not in top-100 |
| Cost-effectiveness evaluation | no data | 2.69 |
| Market segment | Laptop | Desktop processor |
| Series | AMD Raven Ridge (Ryzen 2000 APU) | no data |
| Architecture codename | Pollock (Zen) | no data |
| Release date | 4 August 2020 (3 years ago) | 1 July 2009 (15 years ago) |
| Current price | no data | $42 |
Cost-effectiveness evaluation
Performance per price, higher is better.
Detailed specifications
3015Ce and Core 2 Quad Q9505 basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.
| Physical cores | 2 (Dual-core) | no data |
| Threads | 4 | no data |
| Base clock speed | 1.2 GHz | 2.83 GHz |
| Boost clock speed | 2.3 GHz | no data |
| L1 cache | 192 KB | no data |
| L2 cache | 1 MB | no data |
| L3 cache | 4 MB | 6 MB L2 Cache |
| Chip lithography | 14 nm | 45 nm |
| Maximum core temperature | 105 °C | 71 °C |
| 64 bit support | + | + |
| Windows 11 compatibility | no data | - |
| Unlocked multiplier | No | No |
| VID voltage range | no data | 0.85V-1.3625V |
Compatibility
Information on 3015Ce and Core 2 Quad Q9505 compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.
| Socket | FT5 | FCLGA775,LGA775 |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 6 Watt | 95 Watt |
Technologies and extensions
Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by 3015Ce and Core 2 Quad Q9505. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.
| Instruction set extensions | DDR4-1600 RAM (sin. chan.), PCIe 3, MMX, SSE, SSE2, SSE3, SSSE3, SSE4A, SSE4.1, SSE4.2, AVX, AVX2, BMI2, ABM, FMA, ADX, SMEP, SMAP, SMT, CPB, AES-NI, RDRAND, RDSEED, SHA, SME | no data |
| AES-NI | + | - |
| FMA | + | no data |
| AVX | + | no data |
| Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST) | no data | + |
| Turbo Boost Technology | no data | - |
| Hyper-Threading Technology | no data | - |
| Idle States | no data | + |
| Thermal Monitoring | no data | + |
| Demand Based Switching | no data | - |
| Status | no data | Discontinued |
Security technologies
3015Ce and Core 2 Quad Q9505 technologies aimed at improving security, for example, by protecting against hacks.
| TXT | no data | + |
| EDB | no data | + |
Virtualization technologies
Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by 3015Ce and Core 2 Quad Q9505 are enumerated here.
| VT-d | no data | + |
| VT-x | no data | + |
Memory specs
Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by 3015Ce and Core 2 Quad Q9505. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.
| Supported memory types | DDR4 | no data |
Graphics specifications
General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.
| Integrated graphics card | AMD Radeon RX Vega 3 | no data |
Synthetic benchmark performance
Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.
Combined synthetic benchmark score
This is our combined benchmark performance rating. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.
Core 2 Quad Q9505 outperforms 3015Ce by 3% based on our aggregate benchmark results.
Passmark
Passmark CPU Mark is a widespread benchmark, consisting of 8 different types of workload, including integer and floating point math, extended instructions, compression, encryption and physics calculation. There is also one separate single-threaded scenario measuring single-core performance.
Benchmark coverage: 68%
Core 2 Quad Q9505 outperforms 3015Ce by 3% in Passmark.
Pros & cons summary
| Performance score | 1.35 | 1.39 |
| Recency | 4 August 2020 | 1 July 2009 |
| Chip lithography | 14 nm | 45 nm |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 6 Watt | 95 Watt |
Given the minimal performance differences, no clear winner can be declared between 3015Ce and Core 2 Quad Q9505.
Be aware that 3015Ce is a notebook processor while Core 2 Quad Q9505 is a desktop one.
Should you still have questions on choice between 3015Ce and Core 2 Quad Q9505, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.
Similar processor comparisons
We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.
