Core 2 Duo P8800 vs 3015Ce

VS

Aggregate performance score

3015Ce
2020
2 cores / 4 threads, 6 Watt
1.32
+124%
Core 2 Duo P8800
2009
2 cores / 2 threads, 25 Watt
0.59

3015Ce outperforms Core 2 Duo P8800 by a whopping 124% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

Comparing 3015Ce and Core 2 Duo P8800 processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in the ranking22652814
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Market segmentLaptopLaptop
SeriesAMD Raven Ridge (Ryzen 2000 APU)Intel Core 2 Duo
Power efficiency20.812.23
Architecture codenamePollock (Zen) (2020)Penryn (2008−2011)
Release date4 August 2020 (4 years ago)1 April 2009 (15 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)no data$241

Detailed specifications

3015Ce and Core 2 Duo P8800 basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores2 (Dual-core)2 (Dual-core)
Threads42
Base clock speed1.2 GHz2.66 GHz
Boost clock speed2.3 GHz2.66 GHz
Bus rateno data1066 MHz
L1 cache192 KB128 KB
L2 cache1 MB3 MB
L3 cache4 MB3 MB L2 Cache
Chip lithography14 nm45 nm
Die sizeno data107 mm2
Maximum core temperature105 °C105 °C
Number of transistorsno data410 Million
64 bit support++
Windows 11 compatibilityno data-
VID voltage rangeno data1V-1.25V

Compatibility

Information on 3015Ce and Core 2 Duo P8800 compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

SocketFT5BGA479,PGA478
Power consumption (TDP)6 Watt25 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by 3015Ce and Core 2 Duo P8800. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

Instruction set extensionsMMX, SSE, SSE2, SSE3, SSSE3, SSE4A, SSE4.1, SSE4.2, AVX, AVX2, BMI2, ABM, FMA, ADX, SMEP, SMAP, SMT, CPB, AES-NI, RDRAND, RDSEED, SHA, SMEno data
AES-NI+-
FMA+-
AVX+-
Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST)no data+
Turbo Boost Technologyno data-
Hyper-Threading Technologyno data-
Demand Based Switchingno data-

Security technologies

3015Ce and Core 2 Duo P8800 technologies aimed at improving security, for example, by protecting against hacks.

TXTno data+
EDBno data+

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by 3015Ce and Core 2 Duo P8800 are enumerated here.

VT-xno data+

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by 3015Ce and Core 2 Duo P8800. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesDDR4no data

Graphics specifications

General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.

Integrated graphics cardAMD Radeon RX Vega 3 ( - 600 MHz)no data

Synthetic benchmark performance

Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark performance rating. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

3015Ce 1.32
+124%
Core 2 Duo P8800 0.59

Passmark

Passmark CPU Mark is a widespread benchmark, consisting of 8 different types of workload, including integer and floating point math, extended instructions, compression, encryption and physics calculation. There is also one separate single-threaded scenario measuring single-core performance.

3015Ce 2099
+124%
Core 2 Duo P8800 937

Gaming performance

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 1.32 0.59
Recency 4 August 2020 1 April 2009
Threads 4 2
Chip lithography 14 nm 45 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 6 Watt 25 Watt

3015Ce has a 123.7% higher aggregate performance score, an age advantage of 11 years, 100% more threads, a 221.4% more advanced lithography process, and 316.7% lower power consumption.

The 3015Ce is our recommended choice as it beats the Core 2 Duo P8800 in performance tests.


Should you still have questions on choice between 3015Ce and Core 2 Duo P8800, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


AMD 3015Ce
3015Ce
Intel Core 2 Duo P8800
Core 2 Duo P8800

Similar processor comparisons

We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


3.2 19 votes

Rate 3015Ce on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
4.2 26 votes

Rate Core 2 Duo P8800 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about 3015Ce or Core 2 Duo P8800, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.