Qualcomm Adreno 680's specs such as number of shaders, GPU base clock, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. These parameters indirectly speak of Qualcomm Adreno 680's performance, but for precise assessment you have to consider its benchmark and gaming test results.

Manufacturing process technology	7 nm	of 4 (Radeon 780M)
Power consumption (TDP)	7 Watt	of 2400 (Data Center GPU Max Subsystem)

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of memory installed on Qualcomm Adreno 680: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Note that GPUs integrated into processors have no dedicated memory and use a shared part of system RAM instead.

Shared memory

API compatibility

APIs supported by Qualcomm Adreno 680, sometimes including their particular versions.

DirectX

Benchmark performance

Synthetic benchmark performance of Qualcomm Adreno 680. The combined score is measured on a 0-100 point scale.

Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark performance score. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

Qualcomm Adreno 680 2.75

Passmark

This is the most ubiquitous GPU benchmark, part of Passmark PerformanceTest suite. It gives the graphics card a thorough evaluation under various types of load, providing four separate benchmarks for Direct3D versions 9, 10, 11 and 12 (the last being done in 4K resolution if possible), and few more tests engaging DirectCompute capabilities.

Benchmark coverage: 25%

Qualcomm Adreno 680 715

3DMark 11 Performance GPU

3DMark 11 is an obsolete DirectX 11 benchmark by Futuremark. It used four tests based on two scenes, one being few submarines exploring the submerged wreck of a sunken ship, the other is an abandoned temple deep in the jungle. All the tests are heavy with volumetric lighting and tessellation, and despite being done in 1280x720 resolution, are relatively taxing. Discontinued in January 2020, 3DMark 11 is now superseded by Time Spy.

Benchmark coverage: 17%

Qualcomm Adreno 680 1936

Gaming performance

Let's see how good Qualcomm Adreno 680 is for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in frames per second. Comparisons with game system requirements are included, but remember that sometimes official requirements may reflect reality inaccurately.

FPS performance in popular games

Full HD
Low Preset

Cyberpunk 2077

5−6

Full HD
Medium Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey	4−5
Battlefield 5	4−5
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare	6−7
Cyberpunk 2077	5−6
Far Cry 5	10−11
Far Cry New Dawn	5−6
Forza Horizon 4	10−11
Hitman 3	7−8
Horizon Zero Dawn	16−18
Metro Exodus	2−3
Red Dead Redemption 2	6−7
Shadow of the Tomb Raider	12−14
Watch Dogs: Legion	2−3

Full HD
High Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey	4−5
Battlefield 5	4−5
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare	6−7
Cyberpunk 2077	5−6
Far Cry 5	10−11
Far Cry New Dawn	5−6
Forza Horizon 4	10−11
Hitman 3	7−8
Horizon Zero Dawn	16−18
Metro Exodus	2−3
Red Dead Redemption 2	6−7
Shadow of the Tomb Raider	12−14
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt	6−7
Watch Dogs: Legion	2−3

Full HD
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey	4−5
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare	6−7
Cyberpunk 2077	5−6
Far Cry 5	10−11
Forza Horizon 4	10−11
Horizon Zero Dawn	16−18
Metro Exodus	2−3
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt	6−7
Watch Dogs: Legion	2−3

Full HD
Epic Preset

Red Dead Redemption 2

6−7

1440p
High Preset

Battlefield 5	5−6
Far Cry New Dawn	3−4
Red Dead Redemption 2	1−2

1440p
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey	0−1
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare	5−6
Cyberpunk 2077	1−2
Far Cry 5	4−5
Forza Horizon 4	4−5
Horizon Zero Dawn	7−8
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt	2−3
Watch Dogs: Legion	1−2

4K
High Preset

Far Cry 5	9−10
Horizon Zero Dawn	3−4

4K
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey	1−2
Assassin's Creed Valhalla	1−2
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare	1−2
Forza Horizon 4	0−1
Horizon Zero Dawn	3−4
Metro Exodus	5−6
Watch Dogs: Legion	0−1