Quadro M1000M vs Tiger Lake-U Xe Graphics G7

Place in performance ranking	420	502
Place by popularity	not in top-100	not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluation	no data	0.85
Architecture	Gen. 11 Ice Lake (2019−2022)	Maxwell (2014−2018)
GPU code name	Tiger Lake Xe	GM107
Market segment	Laptop	Mobile workstation
Release date	15 August 2020 (3 years ago)	2 October 2015 (8 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)	no data	$200.89
Current price	no data	$706 (3.5x MSRP)

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance to price ratio. The higher, the better.

no data

Detailed specifications

General performance parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. These parameters indirectly speak of performance, but for precise assessment you have to consider their benchmark and gaming test results. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores	96	512
Core clock speed	no data	993 MHz
Boost clock speed	no data	1072 MHz
Number of transistors	no data	1,870 million
Manufacturing process technology	10 nm	28 nm
Power consumption (TDP)	no data	40 Watt
Texture fill rate	no data	31.78
Floating-point performance	no data	1,017 gflops

Form factor & compatibility

Information on Tiger Lake-U Xe Graphics G7 and Quadro M1000M compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For notebook video cards it's notebook size, connection slot and bus, if the video card is inserted into a slot instead of being soldered to the notebook motherboard.

Laptop size	no data	large
Interface	no data	MXM-A (3.0)
Supplementary power connectors	no data	None

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory type	DDR4	GDDR5
Maximum RAM amount	no data	2 GB/4 GB
Memory bus width	no data	128 Bit
Memory clock speed	no data	5000 MHz
Memory bandwidth	no data	80 GB/s
Shared memory	+	-

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display Connectors	no data	No outputs
Display Port	no data	1.2

Supported technologies

Supported technological solutions. This information will prove useful if you need some particular technology for your purposes.

Optimus	no data	+
3D Vision Pro	no data	+
Mosaic	no data	+
nView Display Management	no data	+
Optimus	no data	+
Quick Sync	+	no data

API compatibility

List of supported graphics and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX	DirectX 12_1	12
Shader Model	no data	5.0
OpenGL	no data	4.5
OpenCL	no data	1.2
Vulkan	no data	+
CUDA	no data	5.0

Synthetic benchmark performance

Non-gaming benchmark performance comparison. The combined score is measured on a 0-100 point scale.

Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark performance score. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

Tiger Lake-U Xe Graphics G7 9.85
+32.7%

M1000M 7.42

Tiger Lake-U Xe Graphics G7 outperforms Quadro M1000M by 33% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

3DMark Fire Strike Graphics

Fire Strike is a DirectX 11 benchmark for gaming PCs. It features two separate tests displaying a fight between a humanoid and a fiery creature made of lava. Using 1920x1080 resolution, Fire Strike shows off some realistic graphics and is quite taxing on hardware.

Benchmark coverage: 14%

Tiger Lake-U Xe Graphics G7 5000
+43%

M1000M 3498

Tiger Lake-U Xe Graphics G7 outperforms Quadro M1000M by 43% in 3DMark Fire Strike Graphics.

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

Average FPS across all PC games

Here are the average frames per second in a large set of popular games across different resolutions:

Full HD	45−50 +21.6%	37 −21.6%
4K	14−16 +16.7%	12 −16.7%

FPS performance in popular games

Full HD
Medium Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey	20−22 +33.3%	14−16 −33.3%
Battlefield 5	30−35 +40.9%	21−24 −40.9%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare	21−24 +31.3%	16−18 −31.3%
Far Cry 5	27−30 +26.1%	21−24 −26.1%
Far Cry New Dawn	27−30 +35%	20−22 −35%
Forza Horizon 4	30−35 +30.8%	24−27 −30.8%
Horizon Zero Dawn	30−35 +26.9%	24−27 −26.9%
Red Dead Redemption 2	27−30 +33.3%	21−24 −33.3%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider	27−30 +27.3%	21−24 −27.3%

Full HD
High Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey	20−22 +33.3%	14−16 −33.3%
Battlefield 5	30−35 +40.9%	21−24 −40.9%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare	21−24 +31.3%	16−18 −31.3%
Far Cry 5	27−30 +26.1%	21−24 −26.1%
Far Cry New Dawn	27−30 +35%	20−22 −35%
Forza Horizon 4	30−35 +30.8%	24−27 −30.8%
Horizon Zero Dawn	30−35 +26.9%	24−27 −26.9%
Metro Exodus	27−30 +45%	20−22 −45%
Red Dead Redemption 2	27−30 +33.3%	21−24 −33.3%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider	27−30 +27.3%	21−24 −27.3%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt	20−22 +5.3%	19 −5.3%

Full HD
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey	20−22 +33.3%	14−16 −33.3%
Battlefield 5	30−35 +47.6%	21−24 −47.6%
Far Cry 5	27−30 +26.1%	21−24 −26.1%
Far Cry New Dawn	27−30 +50%	18−20 −50%
Forza Horizon 4	30−35 +30.8%	24−27 −30.8%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt	20−22 +81.8%	11 −81.8%

1440p
High Preset

Call of Duty: Modern Warfare	12−14 +33.3%	9−10 −33.3%
Horizon Zero Dawn	20−22 +42.9%	14−16 −42.9%
Metro Exodus	14−16 +40%	10−11 −40%
Red Dead Redemption 2	7−8 +40%	5−6 −40%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider	12−14 +44.4%	9−10 −44.4%

1440p
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey	9−10 +50%	6−7 −50%
Battlefield 5	18−20 +35.7%	14−16 −35.7%
Far Cry 5	16−18 +33.3%	12−14 −33.3%
Far Cry New Dawn	16−18 +33.3%	12−14 −33.3%
Forza Horizon 4	18−20 +38.5%	12−14 −38.5%

4K
High Preset

Call of Duty: Modern Warfare	6−7 +50%	4−5 −50%
Horizon Zero Dawn	10−11 +25%	8−9 −25%
Metro Exodus	10−11 +42.9%	7−8 −42.9%
Red Dead Redemption 2	9−10 +50%	6−7 −50%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider	5−6 +66.7%	3−4 −66.7%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt	7−8 +0%	7 +0%

4K
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey	5−6 +25%	4−5 −25%
Battlefield 5	8−9 +100%	4−5 −100%
Far Cry 5	21−24 +43.8%	16−18 −43.8%
Far Cry New Dawn	9−10 +50%	6−7 −50%
Forza Horizon 4	12−14 +50%	8−9 −50%