GeForce 9800M GS vs Radeon R5 M335
Aggregate performance score
GeForce 9800M GS outperforms Radeon R5 M335 by a minimal 1% based on our aggregate benchmark results.
Primary details
GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.
Place in performance ranking | 955 | 952 |
Place by popularity | not in top-100 | not in top-100 |
Cost-effectiveness evaluation | 0.02 | 0.12 |
Architecture | GCN 1.0 (2012−2020) | G9x (2007−2010) |
GPU code name | Exo XT DDR3 | NB9E-GS1 |
Market segment | Laptop | Laptop |
Release date | 16 June 2015 (9 years ago) | 1 November 2008 (15 years ago) |
Current price | $891 | $180 |
Cost-effectiveness evaluation
Performance to price ratio. The higher, the better.
9800M GS has 500% better value for money than R5 M335.
Detailed specifications
General performance parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. These parameters indirectly speak of performance, but for precise assessment you have to consider their benchmark and gaming test results. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.
Pipelines / CUDA cores | 320 | 64 |
CUDA cores | no data | 64 |
Compute units | 5 | no data |
Core clock speed | 1070 MHz | 530 MHz |
Boost clock speed | 1070 MHz | no data |
Number of transistors | 690 million | 505 million |
Manufacturing process technology | 28 nm | 55 nm |
Power consumption (TDP) | unknown | 60 Watt |
Texture fill rate | 21.40 | 16 billion/sec |
Floating-point performance | 684.8 gflops | 169.6 gflops |
Gigaflops | no data | 254 |
Form factor & compatibility
Information on Radeon R5 M335 and GeForce 9800M GS compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For notebook video cards it's notebook size, connection slot and bus, if the video card is inserted into a slot instead of being soldered to the notebook motherboard.
Laptop size | no data | large |
Bus support | PCIe 3.0 | PCI-E 2.0 |
Interface | PCIe 3.0 x8 | PCIe 2.0 x16 |
Supplementary power connectors | None | None |
VRAM capacity and type
Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.
Memory type | DDR3 | GDDR3 |
Maximum RAM amount | 4 GB | 1 GB |
Memory bus width | 64 Bit | 256 Bit |
Memory clock speed | 1100 MHz | 800 MHz |
Memory bandwidth | 14.4 GB/s | 51.2 GB/s |
Shared memory | - | - |
Connectivity and outputs
Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.
Display Connectors | No outputs | No outputs |
Multi monitor support | no data | + |
Maximum VGA resolution | no data | 2048x1536 |
Supported technologies
Supported technological solutions. This information will prove useful if you need some particular technology for your purposes.
AppAcceleration | - | no data |
Enduro | - | no data |
HD3D | + | no data |
PowerTune | + | no data |
DualGraphics | 1 | no data |
TrueAudio | - | no data |
ZeroCore | + | no data |
Switchable graphics | 1 | no data |
Power management | no data | 8.0 |
API compatibility
List of supported graphics and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.
DirectX | DirectX® 12 | 11.1 (10_0) |
Shader Model | 5.0 | 4.0 |
OpenGL | 4.4 | 2.1 |
OpenCL | Not Listed | 1.1 |
Vulkan | + | N/A |
Mantle | + | no data |
CUDA | no data | + |
Synthetic benchmark performance
Non-gaming benchmark performance comparison. The combined score is measured on a 0-100 point scale.
Combined synthetic benchmark score
This is our combined benchmark performance score. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.
GeForce 9800M GS outperforms Radeon R5 M335 by 1% based on our aggregate benchmark results.
Passmark
This is the most ubiquitous GPU benchmark, part of Passmark PerformanceTest suite. It gives the graphics card a thorough evaluation under various types of load, providing four separate benchmarks for Direct3D versions 9, 10, 11 and 12 (the last being done in 4K resolution if possible), and few more tests engaging DirectCompute capabilities.
Benchmark coverage: 25%
GeForce 9800M GS outperforms Radeon R5 M335 by 1% in Passmark.
3DMark Vantage Performance
3DMark Vantage is an outdated DirectX 10 benchmark using 1280x1024 screen resolution. It taxes the graphics card with two scenes, one depicting a girl escaping some militarized base located within a sea cave, the other displaying a space fleet attack on a defenseless planet. It was discontinued in April 2017, and Time Spy benchmark is now recommended to be used instead.
Benchmark coverage: 17%
Radeon R5 M335 outperforms GeForce 9800M GS by 47% in 3DMark Vantage Performance.
Gaming performance
Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.
Average FPS across all PC games
Here are the average frames per second in a large set of popular games across different resolutions:
Full HD | 11
+10%
| 10−12
−10%
|
FPS performance in popular games
Full HD
Low Preset
Cyberpunk 2077 | 4−5
+0%
|
4−5
+0%
|
Full HD
Medium Preset
Assassin's Creed Odyssey | 0−1 | 0−1 |
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare | 3−4
+0%
|
3−4
+0%
|
Cyberpunk 2077 | 4−5
+0%
|
4−5
+0%
|
Far Cry 5 | 7−8
+0%
|
7−8
+0%
|
Far Cry New Dawn | 0−1 | 0−1 |
Forza Horizon 4 | 5−6
−20%
|
6−7
+20%
|
Hitman 3 | 4−5
+0%
|
4−5
+0%
|
Horizon Zero Dawn | 12−14
+0%
|
12−14
+0%
|
Red Dead Redemption 2 | 2−3
+0%
|
2−3
+0%
|
Shadow of the Tomb Raider | 10−11
+0%
|
10−11
+0%
|
Full HD
High Preset
Assassin's Creed Odyssey | 0−1 | 0−1 |
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare | 3−4
+0%
|
3−4
+0%
|
Cyberpunk 2077 | 4−5
+0%
|
4−5
+0%
|
Far Cry 5 | 7−8
+0%
|
7−8
+0%
|
Far Cry New Dawn | 0−1 | 0−1 |
Forza Horizon 4 | 5−6
−20%
|
6−7
+20%
|
Hitman 3 | 4−5
+0%
|
4−5
+0%
|
Horizon Zero Dawn | 12−14
+0%
|
12−14
+0%
|
Red Dead Redemption 2 | 2−3
+0%
|
2−3
+0%
|
Shadow of the Tomb Raider | 10−11
+0%
|
10−11
+0%
|
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt | 6
+50%
|
4−5
−50%
|
Full HD
Ultra Preset
Assassin's Creed Odyssey | 0−1 | 0−1 |
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare | 3−4
+0%
|
3−4
+0%
|
Cyberpunk 2077 | 4−5
+0%
|
4−5
+0%
|
Far Cry 5 | 7−8
+0%
|
7−8
+0%
|
Forza Horizon 4 | 5−6
−20%
|
6−7
+20%
|
Horizon Zero Dawn | 12−14
+0%
|
12−14
+0%
|
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt | 3
−33.3%
|
4−5
+33.3%
|
Full HD
Epic Preset
Red Dead Redemption 2 | 2−3
+0%
|
2−3
+0%
|
1440p
High Preset
Battlefield 5 | 2−3
+0%
|
2−3
+0%
|
Far Cry New Dawn | 1−2
+0%
|
1−2
+0%
|
Red Dead Redemption 2 | 0−1 | 0−1 |
1440p
Ultra Preset
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare | 4−5
+0%
|
4−5
+0%
|
Cyberpunk 2077 | 1−2
+0%
|
1−2
+0%
|
Far Cry 5 | 2−3
+0%
|
2−3
+0%
|
Forza Horizon 4 | 1−2
+0%
|
1−2
+0%
|
Horizon Zero Dawn | 5−6
+0%
|
5−6
+0%
|
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt | 1−2
+0%
|
1−2
+0%
|
4K
High Preset
Far Cry 5 | 6−7
+0%
|
6−7
+0%
|
Horizon Zero Dawn | 2−3
+0%
|
2−3
+0%
|
4K
Ultra Preset
Assassin's Creed Odyssey | 0−1 | 0−1 |
Assassin's Creed Valhalla | 0−1 | 0−1 |
Horizon Zero Dawn | 2−3
+0%
|
2−3
+0%
|
Metro Exodus | 4−5
+0%
|
4−5
+0%
|
4K
Epic Preset
Red Dead Redemption 2 | 3−4
+0%
|
3−4
+0%
|
This is how R5 M335 and 9800M GS compete in popular games:
- R5 M335 is 10% faster in 1080p
Here's the range of performance differences observed across popular games:
- in The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt, with 1080p resolution and the High Preset, the R5 M335 is 50% faster.
- in The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt, with 1080p resolution and the Ultra Preset, the 9800M GS is 33% faster.
All in all, in popular games:
- R5 M335 is ahead in 1 test (3%)
- 9800M GS is ahead in 4 tests (11%)
- there's a draw in 33 tests (87%)
Pros & cons summary
Performance score | 1.42 | 1.43 |
Recency | 16 June 2015 | 1 November 2008 |
Maximum RAM amount | 4 GB | 1 GB |
Chip lithography | 28 nm | 55 nm |
Given the minimal performance differences, no clear winner can be declared between Radeon R5 M335 and GeForce 9800M GS.
Should you still have questions concerning choice between the reviewed GPUs, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.
Comparisons with similar GPUs
We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.