Quadro P1000 vs Radeon Pro WX Vega M GL

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Aggregate performance score

We've compared Radeon Pro WX Vega M GL with Quadro P1000, including specs and performance data.

Pro WX Vega M GL
2018
4 GB HBM2, 65 Watt
12.03
+4.1%

Pro WX Vega M GL outperforms P1000 by a minimal 4% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking399408
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluationno data6.05
Power efficiency13.2220.64
ArchitectureGCN 4.0 (2016−2020)Pascal (2016−2021)
GPU code namePolaris 22GP107
Market segmentMobile workstationWorkstation
Release date24 April 2018 (6 years ago)7 February 2017 (7 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)no data$375

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance to price ratio. The higher, the better.

no data

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores1280640
Core clock speed931 MHz1493 MHz
Boost clock speed1011 MHz1519 MHz
Number of transistors5,000 million3,300 million
Manufacturing process technology14 nm14 nm
Power consumption (TDP)65 Watt40 Watt
Texture fill rate80.8848.61
Floating-point processing power2.588 TFLOPS1.555 TFLOPS
ROPs3216
TMUs8032

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

Laptop sizemedium sizedno data
InterfaceIGPPCIe 3.0 x16
Lengthno data145 mm
Widthno dataMXM Module
Supplementary power connectorsno dataNone

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeHBM2GDDR5
Maximum RAM amount4 GB4 GB
Memory bus width1024 Bit128 Bit
Memory clock speed700 MHz1502 MHz
Memory bandwidth179.2 GB/s96.13 GB/s
Shared memory--

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display ConnectorsNo outputsPortable Device Dependent

Supported technologies

Supported technological solutions. This information will prove useful if you need some particular technology for your purposes.

Optimus-+

API compatibility

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX12 (12_0)12 (12_1)
Shader Model6.46.7
OpenGL4.64.6
OpenCL2.03.0
Vulkan1.2.1311.3
CUDA-6.1

Synthetic benchmark performance

Non-gaming benchmark results comparison. The combined score is measured on a 0-100 point scale.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark score. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

Pro WX Vega M GL 12.03
+4.1%
Quadro P1000 11.56

Passmark

This is the most ubiquitous GPU benchmark. It gives the graphics card a thorough evaluation under various types of load, providing four separate benchmarks for Direct3D versions 9, 10, 11 and 12 (the last being done in 4K resolution if possible), and few more tests engaging DirectCompute capabilities.

Pro WX Vega M GL 4643
+4.1%
Quadro P1000 4460

3DMark 11 Performance GPU

3DMark 11 is an obsolete DirectX 11 benchmark by Futuremark. It used four tests based on two scenes, one being few submarines exploring the submerged wreck of a sunken ship, the other is an abandoned temple deep in the jungle. All the tests are heavy with volumetric lighting and tessellation, and despite being done in 1280x720 resolution, are relatively taxing. Discontinued in January 2020, 3DMark 11 is now superseded by Time Spy.

Pro WX Vega M GL 10020
+67%
Quadro P1000 6001

3DMark Fire Strike Graphics

Fire Strike is a DirectX 11 benchmark for gaming PCs. It features two separate tests displaying a fight between a humanoid and a fiery creature made of lava. Using 1920x1080 resolution, Fire Strike shows off some realistic graphics and is quite taxing on hardware.

Pro WX Vega M GL 7333
+53.2%
Quadro P1000 4787

3DMark Cloud Gate GPU

Cloud Gate is an outdated DirectX 11 feature level 10 benchmark that was used for home PCs and basic notebooks. It displays a few scenes of some weird space teleportation device launching spaceships into unknown, using fixed resolution of 1280x720. Just like Ice Storm benchmark, it has been discontinued in January 2020 and replaced by 3DMark Night Raid.

Pro WX Vega M GL 38986
+26.9%
Quadro P1000 30721

3DMark Time Spy Graphics

Pro WX Vega M GL 2062
+47.8%
Quadro P1000 1395

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

Average FPS across all PC games

Here are the average frames per second in a large set of popular games across different resolutions:

Full HD53
+29.3%
41
−29.3%
4K19
+72.7%
11
−72.7%

FPS performance in popular games

Full HD
Low Preset

Cyberpunk 2077 18−20
+5.6%
18−20
−5.6%

Full HD
Medium Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 33
+22.2%
27−30
−22.2%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 18−20
+5.6%
18−20
−5.6%
Battlefield 5 35−40
+2.7%
35−40
−2.7%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 24−27
+4.3%
21−24
−4.3%
Cyberpunk 2077 18−20
+5.6%
18−20
−5.6%
Far Cry 5 27−30
+3.7%
27−30
−3.7%
Far Cry New Dawn 30−35
+3.1%
30−35
−3.1%
Forza Horizon 4 80−85
−35%
108
+35%
Hitman 3 21−24
+4.5%
21−24
−4.5%
Horizon Zero Dawn 60−65
+3.2%
60−65
−3.2%
Metro Exodus 40−45
+5.3%
35−40
−5.3%
Red Dead Redemption 2 30−35
+3.1%
30−35
−3.1%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 65
+22.6%
53
−22.6%
Watch Dogs: Legion 65−70
+1.5%
65−70
−1.5%

Full HD
High Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 27−30
+3.7%
27−30
−3.7%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 18−20
+5.6%
18−20
−5.6%
Battlefield 5 35−40
+2.7%
35−40
−2.7%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 24−27
+4.3%
21−24
−4.3%
Cyberpunk 2077 18−20
+5.6%
18−20
−5.6%
Far Cry 5 27−30
+3.7%
27−30
−3.7%
Far Cry New Dawn 30−35
+3.1%
30−35
−3.1%
Forza Horizon 4 80−85
−25%
100
+25%
Hitman 3 21−24
+4.5%
21−24
−4.5%
Horizon Zero Dawn 60−65
+3.2%
60−65
−3.2%
Metro Exodus 40−45
+5.3%
35−40
−5.3%
Red Dead Redemption 2 30−35
+3.1%
30−35
−3.1%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 35−40
+5.4%
35−40
−5.4%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 30−33
+3.4%
27−30
−3.4%
Watch Dogs: Legion 65−70
+1.5%
65−70
−1.5%

Full HD
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 17
−58.8%
27−30
+58.8%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 18−20
+5.6%
18−20
−5.6%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 24−27
+4.3%
21−24
−4.3%
Cyberpunk 2077 18−20
+5.6%
18−20
−5.6%
Far Cry 5 27−30
+3.7%
27−30
−3.7%
Forza Horizon 4 80−85
+5.3%
75−80
−5.3%
Hitman 3 21−24
+4.5%
21−24
−4.5%
Horizon Zero Dawn 60−65
+3.2%
60−65
−3.2%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 35−40
+5.4%
35−40
−5.4%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 24
+50%
16
−50%
Watch Dogs: Legion 65−70
+1.5%
65−70
−1.5%

Full HD
Epic Preset

Red Dead Redemption 2 30−35
+3.1%
30−35
−3.1%

1440p
High Preset

Battlefield 5 21−24
+4.5%
21−24
−4.5%
Far Cry New Dawn 18−20
+0%
18−20
+0%

1440p
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 12−14
+9.1%
10−12
−9.1%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 8−9
+0%
8−9
+0%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 12−14
+8.3%
12−14
−8.3%
Cyberpunk 2077 6−7
+0%
6−7
+0%
Far Cry 5 14−16
+7.7%
12−14
−7.7%
Forza Horizon 4 55−60
+5.5%
55−60
−5.5%
Hitman 3 14−16
+7.1%
14−16
−7.1%
Horizon Zero Dawn 24−27
+4.2%
24−27
−4.2%
Metro Exodus 18−20
+5.6%
18−20
−5.6%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 18−20
+11.8%
16−18
−11.8%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 12−14
+9.1%
10−12
−9.1%
Watch Dogs: Legion 75−80
+4.2%
70−75
−4.2%

1440p
Epic Preset

Red Dead Redemption 2 20−22
+5.3%
18−20
−5.3%

4K
High Preset

Battlefield 5 10−12
+0%
10−12
+0%
Far Cry New Dawn 9−10
+12.5%
8−9
−12.5%
Hitman 3 8−9
+14.3%
7−8
−14.3%
Horizon Zero Dawn 55−60
+5.7%
50−55
−5.7%
Metro Exodus 10−12
+10%
10−11
−10%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 15
+66.7%
9−10
−66.7%

4K
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 10
+42.9%
7−8
−42.9%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 5−6
+0%
5−6
+0%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 6−7
+20%
5−6
−20%
Cyberpunk 2077 2−3
+100%
1−2
−100%
Far Cry 5 6−7
+0%
6−7
+0%
Forza Horizon 4 16−18
+6.7%
14−16
−6.7%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 10−11
+11.1%
9−10
−11.1%
Watch Dogs: Legion 5−6
+25%
4−5
−25%

4K
Epic Preset

Red Dead Redemption 2 10−12
+0%
10−12
+0%

This is how Pro WX Vega M GL and Quadro P1000 compete in popular games:

  • Pro WX Vega M GL is 29% faster in 1080p
  • Pro WX Vega M GL is 73% faster in 4K

Here's the range of performance differences observed across popular games:

  • in Cyberpunk 2077, with 4K resolution and the Ultra Preset, the Pro WX Vega M GL is 100% faster.
  • in Assassin's Creed Odyssey, with 1080p resolution and the Ultra Preset, the Quadro P1000 is 59% faster.

All in all, in popular games:

  • Pro WX Vega M GL is ahead in 62 tests (86%)
  • Quadro P1000 is ahead in 3 tests (4%)
  • there's a draw in 7 tests (10%)

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 12.03 11.56
Recency 24 April 2018 7 February 2017
Power consumption (TDP) 65 Watt 40 Watt

Pro WX Vega M GL has a 4.1% higher aggregate performance score, and an age advantage of 1 year.

Quadro P1000, on the other hand, has 62.5% lower power consumption.

Given the minimal performance differences, no clear winner can be declared between Radeon Pro WX Vega M GL and Quadro P1000.

Be aware that Radeon Pro WX Vega M GL is a mobile workstation card while Quadro P1000 is a workstation one.


Should you still have questions concerning choice between the reviewed GPUs, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


AMD Radeon Pro WX Vega M GL
Radeon Pro WX Vega M GL
NVIDIA Quadro P1000
Quadro P1000

Comparisons with similar GPUs

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


No user ratings yet.

Rate Radeon Pro WX Vega M GL on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.5 529 votes

Rate Quadro P1000 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about this comparison, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.