Radeon RX 6650 XT vs Quadro T1200 Mobile

Place in performance ranking	262	68
Place by popularity	not in top-100	100
Cost-effectiveness evaluation	no data	30.07
Architecture	Turing (2018−2021)	Navi / RDNA2 (2020−2022)
GPU code name	TU117	Navi 23
Market segment	Mobile workstation	Desktop
Release date	12 April 2021 (3 years ago)	10 May 2022 (2 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)	no data	$399
Current price	no data	$465 (1.2x MSRP)

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance to price ratio. The higher, the better.

no data

Detailed specifications

General performance parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. These parameters indirectly speak of performance, but for precise assessment you have to consider their benchmark and gaming test results. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores	1024	2048
Core clock speed	855 MHz	2055 MHz
Boost clock speed	1425 MHz	2635 MHz
Number of transistors	4,700 million	11,060 million
Manufacturing process technology	12 nm	7 nm
Power consumption (TDP)	95 Watt (35 - 95 Watt TGP)	176 Watt
Texture fill rate	91.20	337.3

Form factor & compatibility

Information on Quadro T1200 Mobile and Radeon RX 6650 XT compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop video cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility). For notebook video cards it's notebook size, connection slot and bus, if the video card is inserted into a slot instead of being soldered to the notebook motherboard.

Laptop size	medium sized	no data
Interface	PCIe 3.0 x16	PCIe 4.0 x8
Width	no data	2-slot
Supplementary power connectors	no data	1x 8-pin

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory type	GDDR6	GDDR6
Maximum RAM amount	4 GB	8 GB
Memory bus width	128 Bit	128 Bit
Memory clock speed	10000 MHz	17500 MHz
Memory bandwidth	160.0 GB/s	280.3 GB/s
Shared memory	-	no data

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display Connectors	No outputs	1x HDMI 2.1, 3x DisplayPort 1.4a
HDMI	no data	+

API compatibility

List of supported graphics and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX	12 (12_1)	12 Ultimate (12_2)
Shader Model	6.6	6.5
OpenGL	4.6	4.6
OpenCL	3.0	2.1
Vulkan	1.2	1.3
CUDA	7.5	no data

Synthetic benchmark performance

Non-gaming benchmark performance comparison. The combined score is measured on a 0-100 point scale.

Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark performance score. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

T1200 Mobile 19.94

RX 6650 XT 44.72
+124%

Radeon RX 6650 XT outperforms Quadro T1200 Mobile by 124% based on our aggregated benchmark results.

3DMark 11 Performance GPU

3DMark 11 is an obsolete DirectX 11 benchmark by Futuremark. It used four tests based on two scenes, one being few submarines exploring the submerged wreck of a sunken ship, the other is an abandoned temple deep in the jungle. All the tests are heavy with volumetric lighting and tessellation, and despite being done in 1280x720 resolution, are relatively taxing. Discontinued in January 2020, 3DMark 11 is now superseded by Time Spy.

Benchmark coverage: 17%

T1200 Mobile 14387

RX 6650 XT 41739
+190%

Radeon RX 6650 XT outperforms Quadro T1200 Mobile by 190% in 3DMark 11 Performance GPU.

3DMark Vantage Performance

3DMark Vantage is an outdated DirectX 10 benchmark using 1280x1024 screen resolution. It taxes the graphics card with two scenes, one depicting a girl escaping some militarized base located within a sea cave, the other displaying a space fleet attack on a defenseless planet. It was discontinued in April 2017, and Time Spy benchmark is now recommended to be used instead.

Benchmark coverage: 17%

T1200 Mobile 44135

RX 6650 XT 105955
+140%

Radeon RX 6650 XT outperforms Quadro T1200 Mobile by 140% in 3DMark Vantage Performance.

3DMark Fire Strike Graphics

Fire Strike is a DirectX 11 benchmark for gaming PCs. It features two separate tests displaying a fight between a humanoid and a fiery creature made of lava. Using 1920x1080 resolution, Fire Strike shows off some realistic graphics and is quite taxing on hardware.

Benchmark coverage: 14%

T1200 Mobile 10134

RX 6650 XT 29796
+194%

Radeon RX 6650 XT outperforms Quadro T1200 Mobile by 194% in 3DMark Fire Strike Graphics.

3DMark Cloud Gate GPU

Cloud Gate is an outdated DirectX 11 feature level 10 benchmark that was used for home PCs and basic notebooks. It displays a few scenes of some weird space teleportation device launching spaceships into unknown, using fixed resolution of 1280x720. Just like Ice Storm benchmark, it has been discontinued in January 2020 and replaced by 3DMark Night Raid.

Benchmark coverage: 14%

T1200 Mobile 50827

RX 6650 XT 167944
+230%

Radeon RX 6650 XT outperforms Quadro T1200 Mobile by 230% in 3DMark Cloud Gate GPU.

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

Average FPS across all PC games

Here are the average frames per second in a large set of popular games across different resolutions:

Full HD	58 −136%	137 +136%
1440p	33 −121%	73 +121%
4K	81 +103%	40 −103%

FPS performance in popular games

Full HD
Low Preset

Cyberpunk 2077

30−35

−300%

128
+300%

Full HD
Medium Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey	40−45 −90%	75−80 +90%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla	47 −63.8%	75−80 +63.8%
Battlefield 5	65−70 −117%	140−150 +117%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare	40−45 −125%	95−100 +125%
Cyberpunk 2077	30−35 −238%	108 +238%
Far Cry 5	65 −32.3%	85−90 +32.3%
Far Cry New Dawn	55−60 −96.4%	100−110 +96.4%
Forza Horizon 4	65−70 −105%	130−140 +105%
Hitman 3	45−50 −136%	110−120 +136%
Horizon Zero Dawn	60 −445%	327 +445%
Red Dead Redemption 2	55−60 −87.3%	100−110 +87.3%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider	59 −363%	273 +363%
Watch Dogs: Legion	54 −146%	133 +146%

Full HD
High Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey	40−45 −90%	75−80 +90%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla	28 −175%	75−80 +175%
Battlefield 5	65−70 −117%	140−150 +117%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare	40−45 −125%	95−100 +125%
Cyberpunk 2077	30−35 −175%	88 +175%
Far Cry 5	59 −16.9%	69 +16.9%
Far Cry New Dawn	55−60 −32.7%	73 +32.7%
Forza Horizon 4	65−70 −105%	130−140 +105%
Hitman 3	45−50 −136%	110−120 +136%
Horizon Zero Dawn	47 −462%	264 +462%
Metro Exodus	60−65 −143%	146 +143%
Red Dead Redemption 2	55−60 −87.3%	100−110 +87.3%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider	44 −309%	180 +309%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt	71 −156%	182 +156%
Watch Dogs: Legion	47 −153%	119 +153%

Full HD
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey	40−45 −90%	75−80 +90%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla	21 −267%	75−80 +267%
Battlefield 5	65−70 −112%	140−150 +112%
Cyberpunk 2077	30−35 −144%	78 +144%
Far Cry 5	56 −53.6%	85−90 +53.6%
Far Cry New Dawn	55−60 −118%	120−130 +118%
Forza Horizon 4	65−70 −105%	130−140 +105%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt	37 −189%	107 +189%
Watch Dogs: Legion	19 −242%	65 +242%

1440p
High Preset

Call of Duty: Modern Warfare	24−27 −112%	55−60 +112%
Hitman 3	27−30 −96.6%	55−60 +96.6%
Horizon Zero Dawn	32 −119%	70−75 +119%
Metro Exodus	35−40 −116%	80−85 +116%
Red Dead Redemption 2	14−16 −147%	35−40 +147%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider	40−45 −120%	90−95 +120%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt	21−24 −105%	45−50 +105%

1440p
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey	21−24 −133%	45−50 +133%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla	18 −183%	50−55 +183%
Battlefield 5	35−40 −124%	85−90 +124%
Cyberpunk 2077	12−14 −267%	44 +267%
Far Cry 5	41 −178%	114 +178%
Far Cry New Dawn	40−45 −113%	85−90 +113%
Forza Horizon 4	35−40 −146%	95−100 +146%
Watch Dogs: Legion	12 −308%	49 +308%

4K
High Preset

Call of Duty: Modern Warfare	14−16 −100%	30−33 +100%
Hitman 3	14−16 −147%	35−40 +147%
Horizon Zero Dawn	21−24 −168%	55−60 +168%
Metro Exodus	18−20 −111%	40−45 +111%
Red Dead Redemption 2	16−18 −106%	35−40 +106%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider	12−14 −223%	42 +223%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt	21−24 −167%	56 +167%

4K
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey	12−14 −158%	30−35 +158%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla	10−11 −190%	27−30 +190%
Battlefield 5	21−24 −139%	55−60 +139%
Cyberpunk 2077	4−5 −350%	18 +350%
Far Cry 5	35−40 −118%	85−90 +118%
Far Cry New Dawn	21−24 −105%	45−50 +105%
Forza Horizon 4	27−30 −133%	60−65 +133%
Watch Dogs: Legion	8−9 −188%	23 +188%

This is how T1200 Mobile and RX 6650 XT compete in popular games:

RX 6650 XT is 136% faster in 1080p
RX 6650 XT is 121% faster in 1440p
T1200 Mobile is 103% faster in 4K

Here's the range of performance differences observed across popular games:

in Horizon Zero Dawn, with 1080p resolution and the High Preset, the RX 6650 XT is 462% faster than the T1200 Mobile.

All in all, in popular games:

Without exception, RX 6650 XT surpassed T1200 Mobile in all 54 of our tests.

Pros & cons summary

Performance score	19.94	44.72
Recency	12 April 2021	10 May 2022
Maximum RAM amount	4 GB	8 GB
Chip lithography	12 nm	7 nm
Power consumption (TDP)	95 Watt	176 Watt