Radeon Pro 5600M vs Quadro RTX 3000 Max-Q

Place in performance ranking	237	213
Place by popularity	not in top-100	not in top-100
Architecture	Turing (2018−2021)	Navi / RDNA (2019−2020)
GPU code name	N19E-Q1 MAX-Q	Navi 10
Market segment	Mobile workstation	Mobile workstation
Release date	27 May 2019 (4 years ago)	15 June 2020 (3 years ago)

Detailed specifications

General performance parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. These parameters indirectly speak of performance, but for precise assessment you have to consider their benchmark and gaming test results. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores	1920	2560
Core clock speed	600 - 870 MHz	no data
Boost clock speed	1215 - 1380 MHz	1265 MHz
Number of transistors	10,800 million	no data
Manufacturing process technology	12 nm	7 nm
Power consumption (TDP)	60 - 70 Watt	50 Watt
Texture fill rate	175.0	164.8

Form factor & compatibility

Information on Quadro RTX 3000 Max-Q and Radeon Pro 5600M compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For notebook video cards it's notebook size, connection slot and bus, if the video card is inserted into a slot instead of being soldered to the notebook motherboard.

Laptop size	large	medium sized
Interface	PCIe 3.0 x16	PCIe 4.0 x16
Supplementary power connectors	None	None

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory type	GDDR6	HBM2
Maximum RAM amount	6 GB	8 GB
Memory bus width	192 Bit	2048 Bit
Memory clock speed	14000 MHz	1540 MBps
Memory bandwidth	448.0 GB/s	394.2 GB/s
Shared memory	-	-

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display Connectors	No outputs	No outputs
G-SYNC support	+	no data

Supported technologies

Supported technological solutions. This information will prove useful if you need some particular technology for your purposes.

VR Ready

no data

API compatibility

List of supported graphics and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX	12 Ultimate (12_1)	12 (12_1)
Shader Model	6.5	6.5
OpenGL	4.6	4.6
OpenCL	1.2	2.0
Vulkan	1.2.131	1.2
CUDA	7.5	no data

Synthetic benchmark performance

Non-gaming benchmark performance comparison. The combined score is measured on a 0-100 point scale.

Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark performance score. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

RTX 3000 Max-Q 21.62

Pro 5600M 24.07
+11.3%

Radeon Pro 5600M outperforms Quadro RTX 3000 Max-Q by 11% based on our aggregated benchmark results.

Passmark

This is the most ubiquitous GPU benchmark, part of Passmark PerformanceTest suite. It gives the graphics card a thorough evaluation under various types of load, providing four separate benchmarks for Direct3D versions 9, 10, 11 and 12 (the last being done in 4K resolution if possible), and few more tests engaging DirectCompute capabilities.

Benchmark coverage: 25%

RTX 3000 Max-Q 8365

Pro 5600M 9313
+11.3%

Radeon Pro 5600M outperforms Quadro RTX 3000 Max-Q by 11% in Passmark.

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

Average FPS across all PC games

Here are the average frames per second in a large set of popular games across different resolutions:

Full HD	73 −9.6%	80−85 +9.6%
1440p	45 −11.1%	50−55 +11.1%
4K	29 −3.4%	30−35 +3.4%

FPS performance in popular games

Full HD
Low Preset

Cyberpunk 2077

35−40

−11.4%

35−40
+11.4%

Full HD
Medium Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey	40−45 −11.6%	45−50 +11.6%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla	60 +42.9%	40−45 −42.9%
Battlefield 5	70−75 −8.3%	75−80 +8.3%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare	94 +49.2%	60−65 −49.2%
Cyberpunk 2077	35−40 −11.4%	35−40 +11.4%
Far Cry 5	87 +38.1%	60−65 −38.1%
Far Cry New Dawn	55−60 −10.3%	60−65 +10.3%
Forza Horizon 4	70−75 −9.6%	80−85 +9.6%
Hitman 3	100 +38.9%	70−75 −38.9%
Horizon Zero Dawn	76 +49%	50−55 −49%
Red Dead Redemption 2	35−40 −11.4%	35−40 +11.4%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider	76 +43.4%	50−55 −43.4%
Watch Dogs: Legion	70 +52.2%	45−50 −52.2%

Full HD
High Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey	40−45 −11.6%	45−50 +11.6%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla	50 +19%	40−45 −19%
Battlefield 5	70−75 −8.3%	75−80 +8.3%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare	68 +7.9%	60−65 −7.9%
Cyberpunk 2077	35−40 −11.4%	35−40 +11.4%
Far Cry 5	79 +25.4%	60−65 −25.4%
Far Cry New Dawn	55−60 −10.3%	60−65 +10.3%
Forza Horizon 4	70−75 −9.6%	80−85 +9.6%
Hitman 3	82 +13.9%	70−75 −13.9%
Horizon Zero Dawn	61 +19.6%	50−55 −19.6%
Metro Exodus	35−40 −14.3%	40−45 +14.3%
Red Dead Redemption 2	35−40 −11.4%	35−40 +11.4%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider	68 +28.3%	50−55 −28.3%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt	97 +79.6%	50−55 −79.6%
Watch Dogs: Legion	61 +32.6%	45−50 −32.6%

Full HD
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey	40−45 −11.6%	45−50 +11.6%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla	44 +4.8%	40−45 −4.8%
Battlefield 5	70−75 −8.3%	75−80 +8.3%
Cyberpunk 2077	35−40 −11.4%	35−40 +11.4%
Far Cry 5	75 +19%	60−65 −19%
Far Cry New Dawn	55−60 −10.3%	60−65 +10.3%
Forza Horizon 4	70−75 −9.6%	80−85 +9.6%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt	52 −3.8%	50−55 +3.8%
Watch Dogs: Legion	33 −39.4%	45−50 +39.4%

1440p
High Preset

Call of Duty: Modern Warfare	34 −8.8%	35−40 +8.8%
Hitman 3	35−40 −14.3%	40−45 +14.3%
Horizon Zero Dawn	41 +28.1%	30−35 −28.1%
Metro Exodus	21−24 −14.3%	24−27 +14.3%
Red Dead Redemption 2	16−18 −12.5%	18−20 +12.5%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider	43 +34.4%	30−35 −34.4%

1440p
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey	21−24 −13%	24−27 +13%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla	20−22 −20%	24−27 +20%
Battlefield 5	45−50 −12.5%	50−55 +12.5%
Cyberpunk 2077	12−14 −15.4%	14−16 +15.4%
Far Cry 5	35−40 −10.8%	40−45 +10.8%
Far Cry New Dawn	40−45 −12.2%	45−50 +12.2%
Forza Horizon 4	40−45 −11.4%	45−50 +11.4%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt	24−27 −16.7%	27−30 +16.7%
Watch Dogs: Legion	16−18 −12.5%	18−20 +12.5%

4K
High Preset

Call of Duty: Modern Warfare	18 −5.6%	18−20 +5.6%
Hitman 3	27 +17.4%	21−24 −17.4%
Horizon Zero Dawn	12 −33.3%	16−18 +33.3%
Metro Exodus	12−14 −15.4%	14−16 +15.4%
Red Dead Redemption 2	12−14 −8.3%	12−14 +8.3%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider	21 +23.5%	16−18 −23.5%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt	34 +30.8%	24−27 −30.8%

4K
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey	12−14 −15.4%	14−16 +15.4%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla	19 +46.2%	12−14 −46.2%
Battlefield 5	24−27 −12%	27−30 +12%
Cyberpunk 2077	5−6 −20%	6−7 +20%
Far Cry 5	26 +30%	20−22 −30%
Far Cry New Dawn	21−24 −9.5%	21−24 +9.5%
Forza Horizon 4	30−33 −13.3%	30−35 +13.3%
Watch Dogs: Legion	12 +9.1%	10−12 −9.1%

This is how RTX 3000 Max-Q and Pro 5600M compete in popular games:

Pro 5600M is 10% faster in 1080p
Pro 5600M is 11% faster in 1440p
Pro 5600M is 3% faster in 4K

Here's the range of performance differences observed across popular games:

in The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt, with 1080p resolution and the High Preset, the RTX 3000 Max-Q is 80% faster than the Pro 5600M.
in Watch Dogs: Legion, with 1080p resolution and the Ultra Preset, the Pro 5600M is 39% faster than the RTX 3000 Max-Q.

All in all, in popular games:

RTX 3000 Max-Q is ahead in 25 tests (37%)
Pro 5600M is ahead in 43 tests (63%)

Pros & cons summary

Performance score	21.62	24.07
Recency	27 May 2019	15 June 2020
Maximum RAM amount	6 GB	8 GB
Chip lithography	12 nm	7 nm
Power consumption (TDP)	60 Watt	50 Watt