Quadro P5200: specs and benchmarks

VS

Aggregated performance score

It provides good gaming and benchmark performance at 31.72% of a leader's which is GeForce RTX 4090.

RTX 4090GeForce RTX4090
Compare

Summary

NVIDIA started Quadro P5200 sales 11 January 2017. This is a Pascal architecture notebook card based on 16 nm manufacturing process and primarily aimed at designers. 16 GB of GDDR5 memory clocked at 7.22 GHz are supplied, and together with 256 Bit memory interface this creates a bandwidth of 230.4 GB/s.

Compatibility-wise, this is card attached via MXM-B (3.0) interface. Power consumption is at 150 Watt.

Primary Details

Some basic facts about Quadro P5200: architecture, market segment, release date etc.

Place in performance ranking164
Place by popularitynot in top-100
Cost-Effectiveness Evaluation3.40
ArchitecturePascal (2016−2021)
GPU code nameGP104
Market segmentMobile workstation
Release date11 January 2017 (7 years ago)
Current price$3894 of 168889 (A100 PCIe 80 GB)

Cost-Effectiveness Evaluation

Performance to price ratio. The higher, the better.

Detailed Specifications

Quadro P5200's specs such as number of shaders, GPU base clock, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. These parameters indirectly speak of Quadro P5200's performance, but for precise assessment you have to consider its benchmark and gaming test results.

Pipelines / CUDA cores2560of 20480 (Data Center GPU Max NEXT)
Core clock speed1316 MHzof 2610 (Radeon RX 6500 XT)
Boost clock speed1569 MHzof 3599 (Radeon RX 7990 XTX)
Number of transistors7,200 millionof 14400 (GeForce GTX 1070 SLI Mobile)
Manufacturing process technology16 nmof 4 (Radeon 780M)
Power consumption (TDP)150 Wattof 2400 (Data Center GPU Max Subsystem)
Texture fill rate279.4of 969.9 (H100 SXM5 96 GB)

Form Factor & Compatibility

Information on Quadro P5200's compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For notebook video cards it's notebook size, connection slot and bus, if the video card is inserted into a slot instead of being soldered to the notebook motherboard.

Laptop sizelarge
InterfaceMXM-B (3.0)
Supplementary power connectorsNone

Memory typeGDDR5
Maximum RAM amount16 GBof 192 (Radeon Instinct MI300X)
Memory bus width256 Bitof 8192 (Radeon Instinct MI250X)
Memory clock speed7216 MHzof 23000 (GeForce RTX 4080 SUPER)
Memory bandwidth230.4 GB/sof 3276 (Aldebaran)
Shared memory-

Connectivity and Outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on Quadro P5200. As a rule, this section is relevant only for desktop reference graphics cards, since for notebook ones the availability of certain video outputs depends on the laptop model, while non-reference desktop models can (though not necessarily will) bear a different set of video ports.

Display ConnectorsNo outputs

Supported Technologies

Technological solutions and APIs supported by Quadro P5200. You'll probably need this information if you need some particular technology for your purposes.

Optimus+

API Compatibility

APIs supported by Quadro P5200, sometimes including their particular versions.

DirectX12 (12_1)
Shader Model6.4
OpenGL4.6
OpenCL1.2
Vulkan1.2.131
CUDA6.1

Benchmark performance

Synthetic benchmark performance of Quadro P5200. The combined score is measured on a 0-100 point scale.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark performance score. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

Quadro P5200 31.72

Passmark

This is the most ubiquitous GPU benchmark, part of Passmark PerformanceTest suite. It gives the graphics card a thorough evaluation under various types of load, providing four separate benchmarks for Direct3D versions 9, 10, 11 and 12 (the last being done in 4K resolution if possible), and few more tests engaging DirectCompute capabilities.

Benchmark coverage: 25%

Quadro P5200 12278

3DMark Vantage Performance

3DMark Vantage is an outdated DirectX 10 benchmark using 1280x1024 screen resolution. It taxes the graphics card with two scenes, one depicting a girl escaping some militarized base located within a sea cave, the other displaying a space fleet attack on a defenseless planet. It was discontinued in April 2017, and Time Spy benchmark is now recommended to be used instead.

Benchmark coverage: 17%

Quadro P5200 65844

3DMark 11 Performance GPU

3DMark 11 is an obsolete DirectX 11 benchmark by Futuremark. It used four tests based on two scenes, one being few submarines exploring the submerged wreck of a sunken ship, the other is an abandoned temple deep in the jungle. All the tests are heavy with volumetric lighting and tessellation, and despite being done in 1280x720 resolution, are relatively taxing. Discontinued in January 2020, 3DMark 11 is now superseded by Time Spy.

Benchmark coverage: 17%

Quadro P5200 25100

3DMark Fire Strike Graphics

Fire Strike is a DirectX 11 benchmark for gaming PCs. It features two separate tests displaying a fight between a humanoid and a fiery creature made of lava. Using 1920x1080 resolution, Fire Strike shows off some realistic graphics and is quite taxing on hardware.

Benchmark coverage: 14%

Quadro P5200 18467

3DMark Cloud Gate GPU

Cloud Gate is an outdated DirectX 11 feature level 10 benchmark that was used for home PCs and basic notebooks. It displays a few scenes of some weird space teleportation device launching spaceships into unknown, using fixed resolution of 1280x720. Just like Ice Storm benchmark, it has been discontinued in January 2020 and replaced by 3DMark Night Raid.

Benchmark coverage: 14%

Quadro P5200 106328

GeekBench 5 OpenCL

Geekbench 5 is a widespread graphics card benchmark combined from 11 different test scenarios. All these scenarios rely on direct usage of GPU's processing power, no 3D rendering is involved. This variation uses OpenCL API by Khronos Group.

Benchmark coverage: 9%

Quadro P5200 41715

GeekBench 5 Vulkan

Geekbench 5 is a widespread graphics card benchmark combined from 11 different test scenarios. All these scenarios rely on direct usage of GPU's processing power, no 3D rendering is involved. This variation uses Vulkan API by AMD & Khronos Group.

Benchmark coverage: 5%

Quadro P5200 51548

GeekBench 5 CUDA

Geekbench 5 is a widespread graphics card benchmark combined from 11 different test scenarios. All these scenarios rely on direct usage of GPU's processing power, no 3D rendering is involved. This variation uses CUDA API by NVIDIA.

Benchmark coverage: 4%

Quadro P5200 45689

SPECviewperf 12 - specvp12 maya-04

Benchmark coverage: 3%

Quadro P5200 146

SPECviewperf 12 - specvp12 sw-03

Benchmark coverage: 3%

Quadro P5200 206

SPECviewperf 12 - specvp12 snx-02

Benchmark coverage: 3%

Quadro P5200 216

SPECviewperf 12 - specvp12 catia-04

Benchmark coverage: 3%

Quadro P5200 193

SPECviewperf 12 - specvp12 creo-01

Benchmark coverage: 3%

Quadro P5200 156

SPECviewperf 12 - specvp12 medical-01

Benchmark coverage: 3%

Quadro P5200 79

SPECviewperf 12 - specvp12 showcase-01

Benchmark coverage: 3%

Quadro P5200 75

SPECviewperf 12 - Showcase

Benchmark coverage: 2%

Quadro P5200 75

SPECviewperf 12 - Maya

This part of SPECviewperf 12 workstation benchmark uses Autodesk Maya 13 engine to render a superhero energy plant static scene consisting of more than 700 thousand polygons, in six different modes.

Benchmark coverage: 2%

Quadro P5200 146

SPECviewperf 12 - Catia

Benchmark coverage: 2%

Quadro P5200 193

SPECviewperf 12 - Solidworks

Benchmark coverage: 2%

Quadro P5200 206

SPECviewperf 12 - Siemens NX

Benchmark coverage: 2%

Quadro P5200 216

SPECviewperf 12 - Creo

Benchmark coverage: 2%

Quadro P5200 156

SPECviewperf 12 - Medical

Benchmark coverage: 2%

Quadro P5200 79

Gaming performance

Let's see how good Quadro P5200 is for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in frames per second. Comparisons with game system requirements are included, but remember that sometimes official requirements may reflect reality inaccurately.

Average FPS across all PC games

Here are the average frames per second in a large set of popular modern games across different resolutions:

Full HD119
4K48

FPS performance in popular games

Full HD
Low Preset

Cyberpunk 2077 50−55

Full HD
Medium Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 55−60
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 55−60
Battlefield 5 95−100
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 85−90
Cyberpunk 2077 50−55
Far Cry 5 80−85
Far Cry New Dawn 80−85
Forza Horizon 4 100−110
Hitman 3 95−100
Horizon Zero Dawn 65−70
Red Dead Redemption 2 50−55
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 91
Watch Dogs: Legion 60−65

Full HD
High Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 55−60
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 55−60
Battlefield 5 95−100
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 85−90
Cyberpunk 2077 50−55
Far Cry 5 80−85
Far Cry New Dawn 80−85
Forza Horizon 4 100−110
Hitman 3 95−100
Horizon Zero Dawn 65−70
Metro Exodus 55−60
Red Dead Redemption 2 50−55
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 78
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 118
Watch Dogs: Legion 60−65

Full HD
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 55−60
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 55−60
Battlefield 5 95−100
Cyberpunk 2077 50−55
Far Cry 5 80−85
Far Cry New Dawn 80−85
Forza Horizon 4 100−110
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 65
Watch Dogs: Legion 60−65

1440p
High Preset

Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 50−55
Hitman 3 55−60
Horizon Zero Dawn 40−45
Metro Exodus 30−35
Red Dead Redemption 2 24−27
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 45−50

1440p
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 35−40
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 30−35
Battlefield 5 65−70
Cyberpunk 2077 21−24
Far Cry 5 55−60
Far Cry New Dawn 60−65
Forza Horizon 4 65−70
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 40−45
Watch Dogs: Legion 27−30

4K
High Preset

Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 27−30
Hitman 3 30−35
Horizon Zero Dawn 21−24
Metro Exodus 21−24
Red Dead Redemption 2 16−18
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 26
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 46

4K
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 21−24
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 18−20
Battlefield 5 35−40
Cyberpunk 2077 9−10
Far Cry 5 27−30
Far Cry New Dawn 30−35
Forza Horizon 4 40−45
Watch Dogs: Legion 14−16

Relative performance

Overall Quadro P5200 performance compared to nearest competitors among mobile workstation video cards.


AMD equivalent

According to our data, the closest AMD alternative to Quadro P5200 is Radeon Pro Vega 64, which is faster by 6% and higher by 16 positions in our ranking.

Pro Vega 64Radeon ProVega 64
Compare

Here are some closest AMD rivals to Quadro P5200:

Similar GPUs

Here is our recommendation of several graphics cards that are more or less close in performance to the one reviewed.

P5200 Max-QQuadro P5200Max-Q
Compare
RTX 4000 MobileQuadro RTX4000 Mobile
Compare
RTX 4000 Max-QQuadro RTX4000 Max-Q
Compare
Pro Vega 64Radeon ProVega 64
Compare
P5000 MobileQuadro P5000Mobile
Compare
P4200 Max-QQuadro P4200Max-Q
Compare

Recommended processors

These processors are most commonly used with Quadro P5200 according to our statistics.

Community Ratings

Here you can see the user rating of the graphics card, as well as rate it yourself.


4.2 81 vote

Rate Quadro P5200 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & Сomments

Here you can ask a question about Quadro P5200, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.