Radeon PRO W7500 vs GeForce RTX 4080

Place in performance ranking	3	113
Place by popularity	not in top-100	not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluation	17.14	83.11
Architecture	Ada Lovelace	RDNA 3.0 (2022)
GPU code name	AD103-300-A1	Navi 33
Market segment	Desktop	Workstation
Release date	20 September 2022 (1 year ago)	3 August 2023 (less than a year ago)
Launch price (MSRP)	$1,199	$429
Current price	$1451 (1.2x MSRP)	$409 (1x MSRP)

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance to price ratio. The higher, the better.

PRO W7500 has 385% better value for money than RTX 4080.

Detailed specifications

General performance parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. These parameters indirectly speak of performance, but for precise assessment you have to consider their benchmark and gaming test results. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores	9728	1792
Core clock speed	2205 MHz	no data
Boost clock speed	2505 MHz	1700 MHz
Number of transistors	45,900 million	13,300 million
Manufacturing process technology	5 nm	6 nm
Power consumption (TDP)	320 Watt	70 Watt
Texture fill rate	761.5	190.4

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

Interface	PCIe 4.0 x16	PCIe 4.0 x8
Length	310 mm	216 mm
Width	3-slot	1-slot
Supplementary power connectors	1x 16-pin	None

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory type	GDDR6X	GDDR6
Maximum RAM amount	16 GB	8 GB
Memory bus width	256 Bit	128 Bit
Memory clock speed	22400 MHz	10.8 GB/s
Memory bandwidth	716.8 GB/s	172.0 GB/s
Shared memory	-	no data

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display Connectors	1x HDMI 2.1, 3x DisplayPort 1.4a	4x DisplayPort 2.1
HDMI	+	no data

API compatibility

List of supported graphics and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX	12 Ultimate (12_2)	12 Ultimate (12_2)
Shader Model	6.6	6.7
OpenGL	4.6	4.6
OpenCL	3.0	2.2
Vulkan	1.3	1.3
CUDA	8.9	no data

Synthetic benchmark performance

Non-gaming benchmark performance comparison. The combined score is measured on a 0-100 point scale.

Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark performance score. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

RTX 4080 89.52
+136%

PRO W7500 37.96

GeForce RTX 4080 outperforms Radeon PRO W7500 by 136% based on our aggregated benchmark results.

Passmark

This is the most ubiquitous GPU benchmark, part of Passmark PerformanceTest suite. It gives the graphics card a thorough evaluation under various types of load, providing four separate benchmarks for Direct3D versions 9, 10, 11 and 12 (the last being done in 4K resolution if possible), and few more tests engaging DirectCompute capabilities.

Benchmark coverage: 25%

RTX 4080 34609
+136%

PRO W7500 14677

GeForce RTX 4080 outperforms Radeon PRO W7500 by 136% in Passmark.

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

Average FPS across all PC games

Here are the average frames per second in a large set of popular games across different resolutions:

Full HD	246 +146%	100−110 −146%
1440p	172 +146%	70−75 −146%
4K	115 +156%	45−50 −156%

FPS performance in popular games

Full HD
Low Preset

Cyberpunk 2077

231

+143%

95−100
−143%

Full HD
Medium Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey	130−140 +151%	55−60 −151%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla	262 +138%	110−120 −138%
Battlefield 5	240−250 +144%	100−105 −144%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare	160−170 +152%	65−70 −152%
Cyberpunk 2077	231 +143%	95−100 −143%
Far Cry 5	120−130 +154%	50−55 −154%
Far Cry New Dawn	150−160 +142%	65−70 −142%
Forza Horizon 4	270−280 +151%	110−120 −151%
Hitman 3	150−160 +150%	60−65 −150%
Horizon Zero Dawn	478 +139%	200−210 −139%
Metro Exodus	140−150 +140%	60−65 −140%
Red Dead Redemption 2	120−130 +148%	50−55 −148%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider	527 +140%	220−230 −140%
Watch Dogs: Legion	191 +139%	80−85 −139%

Full HD
High Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey	130−140 +151%	55−60 −151%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla	217 +141%	90−95 −141%
Battlefield 5	240−250 +144%	100−105 −144%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare	160−170 +152%	65−70 −152%
Cyberpunk 2077	210 +147%	85−90 −147%
Far Cry 5	155 +138%	65−70 −138%
Far Cry New Dawn	83 +137%	35−40 −137%
Forza Horizon 4	270−280 +151%	110−120 −151%
Hitman 3	150−160 +150%	60−65 −150%
Horizon Zero Dawn	463 +144%	190−200 −144%
Metro Exodus	166 +137%	70−75 −137%
Red Dead Redemption 2	120−130 +148%	50−55 −148%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider	407 +139%	170−180 −139%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt	547 +138%	230−240 −138%
Watch Dogs: Legion	173 +147%	70−75 −147%

Full HD
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey	130−140 +151%	55−60 −151%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla	189 +136%	80−85 −136%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare	160−170 +152%	65−70 −152%
Cyberpunk 2077	190 +138%	80−85 −138%
Far Cry 5	120−130 +154%	50−55 −154%
Forza Horizon 4	270−280 +151%	110−120 −151%
Horizon Zero Dawn	396 +148%	160−170 −148%
Metro Exodus	150 +150%	60−65 −150%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt	258 +158%	100−105 −158%
Watch Dogs: Legion	164 +152%	65−70 −152%

Full HD
Epic Preset

Red Dead Redemption 2

120−130

+148%

50−55
−148%

1440p
High Preset

Battlefield 5	160−170 +137%	70−75 −137%
Far Cry New Dawn	140−150 +140%	60−65 −140%
Hitman 3	120−130 +142%	50−55 −142%
Red Dead Redemption 2	90−95 +166%	35−40 −166%

1440p
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey	100−110 +163%	40−45 −163%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla	153 +155%	60−65 −155%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare	110−120 +149%	45−50 −149%
Cyberpunk 2077	129 +158%	50−55 −158%
Far Cry 5	201 +136%	85−90 −136%
Forza Horizon 4	240−250 +142%	100−105 −142%
Horizon Zero Dawn	332 +137%	140−150 −137%
Metro Exodus	149 +148%	60−65 −148%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider	390 +144%	160−170 −144%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt	210 +147%	85−90 −147%
Watch Dogs: Legion	142 +137%	60−65 −137%

4K
High Preset

Far Cry 5	131 +138%	55−60 −138%
Far Cry New Dawn	140−150 +137%	60−65 −137%
Hitman 3	80−85 +137%	35−40 −137%
Horizon Zero Dawn	150−160 +138%	65−70 −138%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider	133 +142%	55−60 −142%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt	202 +138%	85−90 −138%

4K
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey	75−80 +160%	30−33 −160%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla	100 +150%	40−45 −150%
Battlefield 5	130−140 +140%	55−60 −140%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare	90−95 +160%	35−40 −160%
Cyberpunk 2077	63 +163%	24−27 −163%
Forza Horizon 4	190−200 +149%	80−85 −149%
Horizon Zero Dawn	201 +136%	85−90 −136%
Metro Exodus	130 +136%	55−60 −136%
Watch Dogs: Legion	87 +149%	35−40 −149%

4K
Epic Preset

Red Dead Redemption 2

110−120

+147%

45−50
−147%

This is how RTX 4080 and PRO W7500 compete in popular games:

RTX 4080 is 146% faster in 1080p
RTX 4080 is 146% faster in 1440p
RTX 4080 is 156% faster in 4K

Pros & cons summary

Performance score	89.52	37.96
Recency	20 September 2022	3 August 2023
Cost	$1199	$429
Maximum RAM amount	16 GB	8 GB
Chip lithography	5 nm	6 nm
Power consumption (TDP)	320 Watt	70 Watt